Violence leads Israel to close contested Temple Mount-Al Aqsa site..Fatah calls for day of rage in Jerusalem..”declaration of war”

•November 1, 2014 • Leave a Comment


The contested Temple Mount and Al Aqsa mosque compound was closed to worshipers and visitors Thursday after back-to-back shootings incited fresh riots — a reflection of the deep passions aroused by the site, among the holiest places for both Jews and Muslims.

Yehuda Glick, a stalwart advocate of Jewish access to Temple Mount and rebuilding the Jewish temple on the site, was shot Wednesday night after a meeting at the Begin Heritage Center in Jerusalem. The gunman escaped on a motorcycle, leaving the U.S.-born activist with serious injuries to his chest and neck. He was in intensive care at Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem.

Several hours later, intelligence services identified the shooter as Muataz Hijazi, 32, a Palestinian from Jerusalem who was released from jail two years ago after serving a 10-year sentence for security offenses. Israeli authorities said Hijazi, who worked at the restaurant at the heritage center, waited for Glick after a work shift.

Police special forces surrounded the Hijazi family house in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Abu Tor, where Hijazi was believed to have gone, and called on him to surrender. According to police, he was shot and killed after he opened fire at troops from the roof of the two-story house. Palestinians charge he was not given a chance to turn himself in. Hijazi’s funeral was set for Thursday night.

Palestinians demonstrated outside the house and scuffled with police, who responded to thrown rocks with tear gas and stun grenades, as the city was filled with the sound of sirens and the rumble of helicopters overhead.

The escalation in violence highlights the dispute over the holy site and its role in the latest flare-up in Jerusalem and in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict overall.

Early on Thursday morning, police killed convicted terrorist Moataz Hejazi in a shootout in the Abu Tor neighborhood. Hejazi, 32, is suspected of carrying out the attack on Glick. Hejazi, a member of Islamic Jihad who served 11-and-a-half years in prison for nationalistic crimes, shot Glick four times after he exited the Begin Center, police said.

Glick was transported to Shaare Zedek Medical Center in serious condition.

There was a “very light improvement” in Glick’s condition by Thursday night, according to Prof. Petachia Reissman, of the hospital’s gastroenterology department.

She said the 49-year-old, who holds Israeli and US citizenship and is the spokesman for the Joint Committee of Temple Organizations, remained in serious but stable condition and was still in danger. Glick remained connected to a respirator and was under a general anesthesia; this was likely to continue for a few days, Reissman, who is head of the general surgery department, said.

Protest marches are expected to take place throughout the West Bank after prayers on Friday, Fatah sources told Haaretz. The atmosphere across the Green Line is reported to be tense and angry, they said, and clashes are possible if the marchers approach security positions or roadblocks.

The Fatah chapter in Jerusalem called for Friday to be a day of rage, following the shooting death of Muatnaz Hijazi, 32, the suspected assailant of Glick. Police said that they shot Hijazi after he opened fire on police when they arrived at his home to arrest him.

Islamic Jihad published a notice of mourning for Hijazi on Thursday, saying that he was a member of the organization, though it did not take official responsibility for the attack on Glick.

Daoud Shehab, the organization’s spokesman, described Hijazi as a “dangerous inciter.”

MK Basel Ghattas(Balad) on Thursday called for an investigation into the killing of Hijazi, saying that it raised many questions that required answers. Contradictions in the version of the shooting given by the police raised doubts as to whether it was an attempt to arrest the suspect or a deliberate killing, he said.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas responded strongly to the decision to close the Temple Mount on Thursday, describing it as a “declaration of war” on the Palestinian people.

“Harming the places sacred to Muslims and Christians is a red line,” said Abbas’ spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeineh, adding that the Palestinians will use all measures available to it in international law to bring Israel to account and to halt the aggression.


i believe they opened it again but only for over 50s and women..glick is a dual american citizen and an agent provocateur of divisiveness i am certain..the shooter was quickly eliminated..

abbas: “describing it as a “declaration of war” on the Palestinian people.”


Hatred – Gameplay reveal

•November 1, 2014 • 10 Comments



what the actual fuck?




•November 1, 2014 • 9 Comments


Apart from the nauseating, reprehensible and oft-repeated “‘Israel’ has a right to exist” meme, it is indubitably certain that there is no propaganda buzz-phrase heard quite as frequently from the duplicitous yaps of vile, yellow belly liberals as “blowback terrorism”. The “blowback terrorism” theory suggests that terrorists – in this particular instance, those of the Takfiri variety currently represented by the demented likes of ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, along with Al-Qaeda before them – are birthed via the womb of asinine Western foreign policy. However, as Mouqawamah Music Managing Editor Assad al-Liftawi so aptly noted (1), the Takfiris aren’t mere “blowback” from Western – and “Israeli” – foreign policy, they *are* Western-“Israeli”-GCC-Turkish foreign policy.

Essentially, what the liberals, in all of their glorious, stomach-churning cowardice, would have their constituencies believe is that Takfiri terror groups like ISIS appear out of nowhere in the wake of haphazardly planned and foolishly executed American and European intervention in the Arab and Islamic worlds. It is a theory that they cling to for dear life not only because the truth is far darker, far more sinister and far more disturbing than they would care to admit, but also due to their own criminal complicity in the destructive conspiracy tearing apart Syria and Iraq. But despite their most studious efforts to ensure that “mum’s the word” on where ISIS and its ideological counterparts *actually* come from, the liberals, who are Zionist-Imperialist Hegemony’s most useful and deceptive gatekeepers, have failed in their task.

Due to the blatant nature of its illegal and malevolent meddling in the affairs of resistant, sovereign nation-states in the Maghreb and Mashreq, the US-“Israeli” Empire couldn’t keep the proverbial gloves on its dirty hands for long, and even the Jewish-Zionist-dominated mainstream media picked up stories on the true nature behind ISIS in particular and the roots of Takfiri terrorism more broadly speaking, despite its obvious intentions to provide as much as spin and false context as possible. The Sulzberger-family-owned New York Times admitted that the CIA is running guns to rebel forces from Turkey (2), and more importantly, released a mega-bombshell when it noted that there isn’t a secular fighting force in Syria to speak of (3). Also in the pages of the NYT, US President Obama – referred to adoringly by the Zionist Power Configuration’s Chicago division as America’s first Jewish president (4) – made it clear that arming “moderate” rebels was nothing but a fantasy (5). Obama’s deputy, Joe “I Am A Zionist (6)” Biden, blew the whistle on the Empire’s staunch allies inSaudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates for their pernicious roles in incubating and facilitating the spread of Takfiri fanatics across Bilad al-Sham (7).

Another bombshell was dropped by neocon-mouthpiece The Washington Post, which revealed in a devastating story that a gargantuan contingent of fighters operating under the fictitious “Free ‘Syrian’ Army (FSA)” banner who were trained by imperialist states went off and joined ISIS or Jabhat al-Nusra once their Western-sponsored training sessions were completed (8).  General John Allen, the American regime’s envoy to the recently created “anti-ISIS” international coalition, buried the FSA/“secular” rebel myth further in his confirmation of frequent Nusra-FSA battlefield coordination (9). Reports continue popping up in the mainstream press of US humanitarian aid and other forms of supplies and equipment reaching ISIS, most recently in The Daily Beast (10), a most deplorable Zionist rag. Bottom line is, if “moderate” rebels don’t exist and the FSA was nothing but a media concoction, whom were the United States and its regional and international allies arming? Takfiris, plain and simple; murderous, fanatical Takfiris, many of whom were and are literally mentally unstable (11).

And yet, even the tip of the iceberg remains unscathed. The illegitimate, usurping Zionist entity’s hands, which have been present from the very beginning of the war on Syria in the shadows, going all the way back to 2004 when Mossad and the Zionist-run, Zionist-founded National Endowment For Democracy (NED) began cultivating Syrian opposition groups (12), have now become publically exposed as well, on more fronts than were previously known. The “Israelis” have been intimately involved in training the rebels in Jordan (13). Moreover, as confirmed by former FSA “general” and Jewish “state” quisling Salim Idris, “many, many” Mossad agents are “very active” in Syria (14), accumulating all sorts of intelligence for their plots, including spreading fearmongering amongst the Syrian Druze community in Sweida about the collapse of the Damascus government, solely to generate their support for thepotential partition of a southern chunk of Syria (15). Outspoken Likudnik and the usurping Jewish regime’s former ambassador to the US Michael Oren openly declared last year that “Israel” prefers Al-Qaeda to be in power over the Hizbullah-Iran-aligned Syria of Dr. Bashar al-Assad (16), a stance which “Israeli” Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz reiterated this week in the NYT by declaring that theIslamic Republic of Iran is a greater threat than ISIS (17).

Continue here:


this is an amazing article and i encourage you to read it in full..i have left all the hyperlinks in tact..check it out..i note he mentions a group called NED who i have been featuring a bit lately..

are the sauds tearing apart islam for their friends?


Evolution and creation both right says Pope

•November 1, 2014 • 5 Comments



It is possible to believe in both evolution and the Catholic church’s teaching on creation, Pope Francis has said, as he cautioned against portraying God as a kind of magician who made the universe with a magic wand.

“The big bang, which is today posited as the origin of the world, does not contradict the divine act of creation; rather, it requires it,” the pope said in an address to a meeting at the pontifical academy of sciences.

“Evolution of nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation because evolution presupposes the creation of beings which evolve.”

Francis, 77, said it was easy to misinterpret the creation story as recounted in the book of Genesis, according to which God created heaven and Earth in six days and rested on the seventh.

“When we read the creation story in Genesis we run the risk of imagining that God was a magician, with a magic wand which is able to do everything,” he said.

“But it is not so. He created beings and let them develop according to internal laws which He gave every one, so they would develop, so they would reach maturity.”

Although Francis was packaging the ideas with his trademark eye for a soundbite, the content of what he was saying does not mark a break with Catholic teaching, which has modified considerably since Charles Darwin published On The Origin of Species in 1859.

Popes before him have also said that– with certain provisos – there is no incompatibility between evolution and God as divine creator.

Pope Francis has continued his habit of making provocative, seemingly progressive statements, while delivering an address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. The pontiff appeared to endorse the theory of the Big Bang and told the gathering at the Vatican that there was no contradiction between believing in God as well as the prevailing scientific theories regarding the expansion of our universe.

“When we read about creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything. But that is not so,” Francis said. “He created human beings and let them develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one so they would reach their fulfillment.”

The Pope avoids gesturing at the thorny issue (at least for some Christians) of whether humans descended from apes. Atheists argue, moreover, that understanding the Big Bang and what emerged from that cosmic moment obviates a need to believe in a deity. On that count, Francis obviously disagrees. He repeated the idea of God not being a “magician,” an entity that conjured all into being.

Such thinking is not new for the Catholic Church, which for six decades – since the reforms of Pope Pius XII – has espoused belief in theistic evolution. That hinges, of course, on the fundamental acceptance of a higher power.


“the content of what he was saying does not mark a break with Catholic teaching”

they are definitely playing a game with this pope and trying to portray him as being progressive whilst not changing anything anyway..this is another example where he says one thing but nothing will change and when the dust settles the teachings will remain the same..

“The Pope avoids gesturing at the thorny issue (at least for some Christians) of whether humans descended from apes.”



Restricting population growth will not solve global issues of sustainability

•November 1, 2014 • 1 Comment


Restricting population growth will not solve global issues of sustainability in the short term, new research says.

A worldwide one-child policy would mean the number of people in 2100 remained around current levels, according to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Even a catastrophic event that killed billions of people would have little effect on the overall impact, it said.

There may be 12 billion humans on Earth by 2100, latest projections suggest.

Concerns about the impact of people on the planet’s resources have been growing, especially if the population continues to increase.

The authors of this new study said roughly 14% of all the people who ever existed were alive today.

These growing numbers mean a greater impact on the environment than ever, with worries about the conversion of forests for agriculture, the rise of urbanisation, the pressure on species, pollution, and climate change.

The picture is complicated by the fact that while the overall figures have been growing, the world’s per-capita fertility has been declining for several decades.

The impact on the environment has increased substantially, however, because of rising affluence and consumption rates.

Many experts have argued the best way of tackling this impact is to facilitate a rapid transition to much lower fertility rates.

To work out the impact on population, the team constructed nine different scenarios for population change up to the year 2100, using data from the World Health Organization, and the US Census Bureau’s international database.

They also used “catastrophe scenarios” to simulate the impacts of climate disruption, wars or global pandemics on population trends.

According to the study, attempts to curb our population as a short-term fix will not work.

If China’s much criticised one-child policy was implemented worldwide, the Earth’s population in 2100 would still be between five and 10 billion, it says.

The planet’s large, growing, and overconsuming human population, especially the increasing affluent component, is rapidly eroding many of the Earth’s natural ecosystems. However, society’s only real policy lever to reduce the human population humanely is to encourage lower per capita fertility. How long might fertility reduction take to make a meaningful impact? We examined various scenarios for global human population change to the year 2100 by adjusting fertility and mortality rates (both chronic and short-term interventions) to determine the plausible range of outcomes. Even one-child policies imposed worldwide and catastrophic mortality events would still likely result in 5–10 billion people by 2100. Because of this demographic momentum, there are no easy ways to change the broad trends of human population size this century.

The United Nations (UN) recently released population projections based on data until 2012 and a Bayesian probabilistic methodology. Analysis of these data reveals that, contrary to previous literature, the world population is unlikely to stop growing this century. There is an 80% probability that world population, now 7.2 billion people, will increase to between 9.6 billion and 12.3 billion in 2100. This uncertainty is much smaller than the range from the traditional UN high and low variants. Much of the increase is expected to happen in Africa, in part due to higher fertility rates and a recent slowdown in the pace of fertility decline. Also, the ratio of working-age people to older people is likely to decline substantially in all countries, even those that currently have young populations.


striking a blow against the eugenicists..

but they will soldier on..and loo to bring in one child or even no child policies..

“However, society’s only real policy lever to reduce the human population humanely is to encourage lower per capita fertility.”


“They also used “catastrophe scenarios” to simulate the impacts of climate disruption, wars or global pandemics on population trends.”

“climate disruption”..right..yeah that will kill millions..of course..


The nuclear attack on the UK that never happened

•October 31, 2014 • 2 Comments


In 1982, a secret Home Office exercise tested the UK’s capacity to rebuild after a massive nuclear attack. Files recently released at the National Archives detail one short-lived proposal to recruit psychopaths to help keep order.

More than 300 megatons of nuclear bombs are detonated over Britain, in the space of a 16-hour exchange. Many cities are flattened – millions are dead from the blast, millions more have survived and suffer radiation sickness. In bunkers are 12 regional commissioners with their staff, ready to come out and take charge. How do they do this? How do they restore order and begin to rebuild?

This was what a top-secret Home Office exercise intended to test in 1982, according to documents recently released at the National Archives. Optimistically termed Regenerate, this was a war game covering the first six months after the nuclear exchange of World War Three. It focused on one central region, the five counties of Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire and South Yorkshire.

Officials imagined what would happen after the bombs had dropped. They knew the most likely targets in the area, and predicted how “rings” of damage would affect the country. At the epicentres of the bombs, there would be “unimaginable” damage, on the outer ring “broken panes” and “debris in the streets”. The scientific advisers estimated 50% of the country would be untouched – though survivors could be affected by radiation fallout.

Planning the war game, one civil servant tried to imagine how law and order would be maintained. Jane Hogg, a scientific officer in the Home Office, envisaged the police would be busy helping “inadequate” people in disaster-struck areas, and suggested that another group could be recruited to help keep order.

“It is… generally accepted that around 1% of the population are psychopaths,” she wrote.

“These are the people who could be expected to show no psychological effects in the communities which have suffered the severest losses.”

Hogg suggested psychopaths would be “very good in crises” as “they have no feelings for others, nor moral code, and tend to be very intelligent and logical”.

If this is starting to sound vaguely familiar, it’s because it is very close to the plot of the award-winning BBC Drama Threads, which was broadcast in 1984. That followed the fortunes of two families in South Yorkshire, before and after nuclear war. Acclaimed at the time for its shockingly detailed portrayal of the impact of nuclear strike, it closely followed Exercise Regenerate. The drama’s producer, Mick Jackson, knew about the game, and the file shows he’d made a formal request to observe it. He was turned down.

The breakdown – or disorder – depicted in Threads was how the game imagined the days and weeks after the strike. Vigilante groups emerged, challenging the authorities. Within the bunkers, morale fell. Some industry survived, but who would run it and how? The administration was weak.

Shot on a budget of £250,000–350,000, the film was notable in being the first of its kind to depict a nuclear winter.Certain reviewers have nominated Threads as the “film which comes closest to representing the full horror of nuclear war and its aftermath, as well as the catastrophic impact that the event would have on human culture”. It has been compared to the earlier programme The War Game produced in Britain in the 1960s and its contemporary The Day After, a 1983 ABC television film depicting a similar scenario in the United States


“If this is starting to sound vaguely familiar, it’s because it is very close to the plot of the award-winning BBC Drama Threads, which was broadcast in 1984.”

truth is stranger than fiction time and time again..

“Acclaimed at the time for its shockingly detailed portrayal of the impact of nuclear strike, it closely followed Exercise Regenerate. The drama’s producer, Mick Jackson, knew about the game, and the file shows he’d made a formal request to observe it.”

a really early example of predictive programming?..and they wanted to use psychopaths to enforce law and order..thats the pot calling the kettle black..psychopaths organising psychopaths..

“Hogg suggested psychopaths would be “very good in crises” as “they have no feelings for others, nor moral code, and tend to be very intelligent and logical”


At least 29 members of US House of Representatives are Israeli dual citizens

•October 31, 2014 • 23 Comments

Barney Frank

There is no other country in the world that allows members of its national government to be a citizen of two different nations at the same time, except the United States. The dual citizen status can only apply to citizens of Israel, and no other country. This change to US law was made possible by the subversion and betrayal of Jewish Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, a Johnson appointee, who later had to resign from the Supreme Court. This disastrous change to our immigration law MUST be changed back to no dual citizens allowed to participate in any government office. In the meantime, you have an opportunity to remove 29 of these Israeli fifth columnists from the House of Representatives on November 4. Do your part and VOTE on November 4 and kick the traitors out of Congress.

House of Representatives:

1. Representative Gary Ackerman (New York)
2. Representative John H. Adler (New Jersey)
3. Representative Shelley Berkley (Nevada)
4. Representative Howard Berman (California)
5. Representative Steve Cohen (Tennessee)
6. Representative Susan Davis (California)
7. Representative Eliot Engel (New York)
8. Representative Bob Filner (California)
9. Representative Barney Frank (Massachusetts)
10. Representative Gabrielle Giffords (Arizona)
11. Representative Alan Grayson (Florida)
12. Representative Jane Harman (California)
13. Representative Paul Hodes (New Hampshire)
14. Representative Steve Israel (New York)
15. Representative Steve Kagen (Wisconsin)
16. Representative Ronald Klein (Florida)
17. Representative Sander Levin (Michigan)
18. Representative Nita Lowey (New York)
19. Representative Jerry Nadler (New York)
20. Representative Jared Polis (Colorado)
21. Representative Steve Rothman (New Jersey)
22. Representative Jan Schakowsky (Illinois)
23, Representative Adam Schiff (California)
24. Representative Allyson Schwartz (Pennsylvania)
25. Representative Brad Sherman (California)
26. Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida)
27. Representative Henry Waxman (California)
28. Representative Anthony Weiner (New York)
29. Representative John Yarmuth (Kentucky)


staggering..why is this so?

and its not for any other country..only israel..

“The dual citizen status can only apply to citizens of Israel, and no other country.”



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 960 other followers

%d bloggers like this: