Jean-Claude Juncker: Speaking about touchy economic topics..“When it becomes serious, you have to lie.”

Economic policy of the eurozone needs to be decided in “dark, secret rooms”, Eurogroup chief and Prime Minister of Luxembourg Jean-Claude Juncker said at a conference organised by the European Movement. Challenged by a member of the audience to reverse this undemocratic attitude, Juncker called him “naive” and said he’d rather be labelled as undemocratic than fuel market speculations.

http://blogs.wsj.com/brussels/2011/05/09/luxembourg-lies-on-secret-meeting/

Is lying considered an appropriate mode of communication for euro-zone leaders?

We have to wonder after a strange episode on Friday evening. Here’s what happened:

Just before 6 p.m., German news magazine Spiegel Online distributed a report saying that euro-zone finance ministers were convening a secret, emergency meeting in Luxembourg that evening to discuss a Greek demand to quit the euro zone.

Calls from reporters flooded in to Guy Schuller, the spokesman for Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker, the man who is the head of the Eurogroup council of euro-zone finance ministers.

In a phone call and text messages with two reporters for Dow Jones and the Wall Street Journal, Mr. Schuller repeatedly said no meeting would be held. He apparently said the same to other news outlets; at least one more moved his denials on financial newswires.

Of course, there was a meeting–although not, apparently, to talk about Greece quitting the currency, which would be an extreme step to say the least. Mr. Juncker even said a few words to reporters who had hustled to Luxembourg to stake out the gathering.

So why the lie?

“I was told to say there was no meeting,” said Mr. Schuller, reached by telephone Monday. “We had certain necessities to consider.”

Such as?

Evening in Europe is midday in the United States. “We had Wall Street open at that point in time,” Mr. Schuller said. The euro was falling on the Spiegel report, which had overhyped the meeting. “There was a very good reason to deny that the meeting was taking place.” It was, he said, “self-preservation.”

Asked whether such deliberate misinformation would undermine the market’s confidence in future euro-zone pronouncements, Mr. Schuller, lamenting that the market had practically no confidence in pronouncements already, said “not at all.”

When Mr. Juncker, or European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet, or French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde say something to the markets, Mr. Schuller said, “nobody seems to believe it.”

Mr. Juncker, who has been prime minister of Luxembourg since 1995, has been president of the Eurogroup since 2005. In that position, he bears primary responsibility for communicating the euro-zone’s financial and economic posture. At press conferences after Eurogroup meetings, he shares the dais with European Economy Commissioner Olli Rehn–and almost always speaks first.

Mr. Juncker has voiced support for the practice of lying before.

The Web site EUobserver has video of Mr. Juncker, at a conference on economic governance in April, expounding on the practice and reasons for lying in financial and economic communications.

———–

he said it..not me..hes spilled the beans.. its acceptable to lie to the population if its a touchy subject..well so much for transparency..like it ever existed anyway..nice one juncker..

401

About these ads

~ by seeker401 on February 23, 2012.

5 Responses to “Jean-Claude Juncker: Speaking about touchy economic topics..“When it becomes serious, you have to lie.””

  1. To lie to the public I am sure is par for the course in this game. What interest me is who exactly was his audience at this meeting and what prompted him to make such a candor statement…since actually, he spoke the truth.

  2. Weird rumor that Clinton will helm World Bank resurfaces:

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Mises-Economics/2012/0220/Hillary-Clinton-s-new-job-At-the-world-bank

    “Hillary Clinton’s new job: At the world bank?
    Hillary Clinton has announced that she is interested in a job at the World Bank, opening up when Robert Zoellick retires.
    Within minutes of Robert Zoellick’s announcement that he will leave the world bank being made public, Hillary Clinton announced that she was interested in the job…”

    BUT: the link that should show Clinton’s statement of interest says nothing of the kind! http://www.forbes.com/sites/worldviews/2012/02/17/who-will-lead-the-world-bank/
    “…Bloomberg reports that Secretary Hillary Clinton and former head of Obama’s National Economic Council Lawrence Summers are the two leading candidates being considered by the White House, to succeed Zoellick. Quoting people with knowledge of the White House private discussions, Bloomberg writes that “the position would be Clinton’s if she sought it”––which she has repeatedly denied.Clinton would be the first-ever woman to lead the global financial institution. By most accounts, she has been a terrific Secretary of State, and one of the most powerful and respected voices of the Obama Administration. The possibilities are tremendous and exciting about the change Clinton might be able to bring to the world of global development and finance, were she to take the helm of the World Bank…”

    • sounds like they have selected her before she applied..she must be one of their topliners..and i guess she is when you look at it..she would carry on the tradition..

      • She’d be crazy to be the one at the helm when the ship goes down.
        The timing of the last rumor was pretty bizarre, she was out of the country and so unable to combat the rumor for over a day. http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/from-clinton-aide-the-ultimate-denial-the-story-is-bogus/2011/06/09/AGYh7zNH_story.html Then the Weinergate scandal occurred and knocked it off the radar. I’ve always thought that was really coincidental timing, but have never decided for what it was to cover. Huma Abedin, the wife, is Clinton’s highest level aide, so the outing of the husband as a perv was a blow to Clinton as well.

        I know people who thought it was Kerry angling for the SOS job hoping to make her look duplicitous/ incompetent. I guess it is an election year, but she’s already said she’s a one termer SOS. Much better for the new SOS to let her stay as long as possible so every mistake of the Obama administration can be loaded onto her back when she goes!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 978 other followers

%d bloggers like this: