U.N. Ambassador Rice helped thwart Bin Ladens capture
Our U.N. ambassador, champion of the altered Benghazi talking points, helped block attempts by Sudan to turn over the world’s most wanted terrorist outright or share intelligence leading to his capture.
Our U.N. ambassador, champion of the altered Benghazi talking points, played a key role in blocking attempts by Sudan to turn over the world’s most wanted terrorist outright or share intelligence leading to his capture.
It does not surprise us that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice either willfully or blindly parroted altered Benghazi talking points, going on five Sunday news shows on Sept. 16 to push the false narrative that the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was not a terrorist attack but a flash mob inflamed by a months-old Internet trailer insulting to Islam. This isn’t the first time she has been clueless about and blind to the reality of terror.
As we mentioned in an earlier editorial about her possible appointment as secretary of state, “In 1996, while serving as assistant secretary of state for African affairs under former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Rice helped persuade President Clinton to rebuff Sudan’s offer to turn Osama bin Laden, who was then living there, over to U.S. authorities.”
Richard Miniter, author of the book “Losing bin Laden,” told World Magazine in 2003 that Rice played a primary role in scuttling the deal in which Sudan could have turned over bin Laden to the U.S.
As a member of Clinton’s National Security Council, he wrote, she doubted Sudan’s credibility.
“The FBI, in 1996 and 1997, had their efforts to look at terrorism data and deal with the bin Laden issue overruled every single time by the State Department, by Susan Rice and her cronies, who were hell-bent on destroying the Sudan,” Miniter said.
Miniter noted that “Rice (cited) the suffering of Christians (in Sudan) as one reason that she doubted the integrity of the Sudanese offers. But her analysis largely overlooked the view of U.S. Ambassador to Sudan Tim Carney, who argued for calling Khartoum’s bluff.”
Rice wanted to punish Sudan rather than cooperate with it and accept its offer.
Carney co-authored a Washington Post op-ed with former Bill Clinton diplomatic troubleshooter Mansoor Ijaz in 2002 in which they detailed how Rice had frustrated attempts to get bin Laden even as Sudan had agreed to cooperate in 1997 to aid in rooting out terrorists without the U.S. dropping sanctions against it.
————
shes got some form eh?
in charge of africa when it was hit with the embassy bombings..and so quick to dismiss benghazi as nothing..
401
+R hodesStudent like billy +Father F edGovernor
those are 3strikes
What about about the litmus test ?
[...] U.N. Ambassador Rice helped thwart Bin Ladens capture (seeker401.wordpress.com) [...]
She’s nothing more than another globalist ‘slave merchant / trader’ for the corporations, in my opinion!
from a 2003 interview of Susan Rice – Roads to Riches
Mishal Husain: Let me just ask you for a moment about the details of the relationship between South Africa and the United States. I mean this is the country that is the United States’ biggest trading partner in Africa. How important is it for the United States, if this is an economy that makes this transition to deracialization and that is on firm equal fitting for the future?
“Susan Rice: I think it’s very important. It’s important for a variety of reasons. And if I can, I’d like to go into some depth on them. First of all from an economic point of view, South Africa is the largest economy on the continent, our largest trading partner, an engine for economic growth and development for much of the rest of southern Africa and, in fact, Africa more broadly.
South Africa’s increasingly, for example, the largest foreign investor in various other parts of Africa. So as its economy goes, so to will go much of the rest of sub-Saharan Africa. And we have a stake in South Africa and Africa’s success.
(this is the most telling part of the interview, imo)
“Our own economy, as you know, is increasingly dependent on trade and investment and exports to the rest of the world. And Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa in particular, represents really the world’s last untapped market for the United States. ” (untapped market = cheap slave labor?)
And as the market in Africa grows, so too will there be benefits in the United States as well as for the people of Africa. Right now, about 100,000 American jobs depend on U.S. exports to Africa. As Africa grows, that number will grow from the United States point of view. It will also mean benefits for companies, businesses, and, hopefully, average people on the African continent.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/episodes/road-to-riches/interview-susan-rice/2921/
““Our own economy, as you know, is increasingly dependent on trade and investment and exports to the rest of the world. And Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa in particular, represents really the world’s last untapped market for the United States. ” (untapped market = cheap slave labor?)”
always cheap labour..always..