Huge bearish bet against banks has traders buzzing
http://www.businessinsider.com/massive-options-bet-against-bank-etf-2013-2#ixzz2K9PGePay
According to Barron’s columnist Steven Sears, someone made a big bet against the financials ETF yesterday (ticker symbol XLF), and it has everybody buzzing.
The trader bought 100,000 put options on the ETF (a put option increases in value when the price of the underlying asset, in this case, the ETF, goes down).
To put that number in perspective, Sears writes, “Few investors ever trade more than 500 contracts, so a 100,000 order tends to stop traffic and prompt all sorts of speculation about what’s motivating the trade.” According to Sears, the trade “has sparked conversations across the market.”
The trade makes money if the ETF drops below $16. It’s trading just north of $17.50 today.
While the bet has everyone scratching their heads, Sears offers one possible explanation: bank stocks have been on a tear lately, so it make sense for someone who own bank stocks to hedge against a reversal by purchasing put options on the ETF that tracks bank stocks.
However, Sears says a trader trying to hedge against a short-term reversal didn’t need to set up the trade this way:
To be sure, it makes perfect sense to hedge a hot fund like the financial sector SPDR. The fund has surged this year, and gained about 7.2%. But if the mystery hedger was simply concerned the financial sector exchange-traded fund would retreat from its 52-week high of 17.66, which is reasonable, there are shorter-term hedges. For instance, he could have bought puts that expire no later than March, because they would be more sensitive to near-term changes.
By choosing April puts, the mystery investor has some traders concerned that they, along with the majority of investors, are too optimistic ahead of the coming budget fight.
Interestingly, Art Cashin alerted readers of his daily note to a similarly large and bearish but separate trade this morning.
————-
its for the next 2 months and its banking on doom..as we approach the legatus weekend..if its to go to plan we need a 120 point rise friday on the dow for a double top..then its down on monday..see what happens eh?
look at this..
STOP PRESS:
http://www.france24.com/en/20130207-asian-astrologers-warn-stormy-year-snake
“A stock market slide, escalated conflict between Japan and China and more Gangnam-styled success for South Korean singer Psy will shape the incoming Year of the Snake, say Asian soothsayers.
Those who make predictions according to the study of feng shui — or literally “wind-water” — are influential in many parts of Asia, where people adjust their lives or renovate houses and offices based on the advice.
As they bid farewell to the Year of the Dragon, the fortune tellers warn that the “black water snake” that emerges to replace it on February 10 — the first day of the Lunar New Year — could be a venomous one that brings disaster.
Previous Snake years have been marked by the September 11, 2001 terror strikes that killed nearly 3,000 people, the crushing of the 1989 Tiananmen pro-democracy protests and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.
The 1929 stock market plunge that heralded the Great Depression also occurred in a snake year.”
401



Credit Agricole’s said that it”s gonna face “historical losses”
http://bourse.lesechos.fr/infos-conseils-boursiers/infos-conseils-valeurs/infos/credit-agricole-vers-des-pertes-historiques-apres-de-nouvelles-depreciations-846118.php
And this awkward news dealing with Barclays and the Qatari
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/01/us-barclays-probe-idUSBRE9100E420130201
Qatari are behind all curtains these days: Mali war, Barclays….
Would be interesting to see the bloodline of the Qatari
good question..as i keep saying..they punch way above their weight range..world cup as well..
barclays gave them money to loan back to them?..is that what i am reading??
exactly… if i lend u one dollar interest free today and you lend it back to me at 5% tomorrow, who does it benefit? except the clock
Clusterfuck..and in the end..it’s just pixels of debt.
i misformulate, better have said as such: The three parties benefit: barclays, the qatari and the authority asking for more time