15 facts about The Port Arthur Massacre you NEED to know



You probably believe that Martin Bryant, acting alone, carried out the Port Arthur massacre on Sunday 28th April 1996. If so, can you reconcile the following facts with the official story?

1. On the Sunday morning, two hours before the murders, ten of the senior managers of Port Arthur were taken to safety many miles away up the east coast,for a two day seminar with a vague agenda and no visiting speakers. Was the timing of this trip a mere coincidence?

2. Also just before the shootings the only two policemen in the region were called away on a wild goose chase. They were sent to the Coal Mine at Salt Water River, to investigate a heroin drug stash which turned out to be soap powder. This was too far for them to get to the Broad Arrow Cafe in time to be of any use. Had a policeman remained at Dunalley he would have closed the swing bridge to prevent the killer(s) from escaping from the peninsula. Did Bryant, IQ 66, organise this decoy?

3. Big Mortuary Truck. Before the massacre, a specially-built 22 person capacity mortuary truck was built. It attracted some derision at the time, but its effective use at Port Arthur was unquestioned. After the massacre it was advertised, unsuccessfully, for sale via the internet, then converted for another purpose. Without the foresight of Port Arthur, why build it? When it had proven its worth, why get rid of it? Another coincidence?

4. Martin Bryant has never been properly identified as the gunman. A young woman who ate her lunch near the gunman just before 1.30 said he had a freckled face. Graham Collyer, the wounded ex-soldier, who had the best opportunity to observe the killer, said he had a pock-marked or acned face. Neither description fits Bryant who has a beautifully smooth complexion. Graham Collyer says that it was not Bryant who shot him in the neck.

5. Illegal Photo. On 30th April the Hobart Mercury printed an old photo of Martin Bryant on the front page. This was illegal because at that stage some of the witnesses had not yet been asked to identify the killer, and the photo would have become fixed in the minds of the witnesses. When one witness was asked to describe the clothing worn by the gunman, she described the clothing on the old photo instead of what the gunman had worn. The Mercury newspaper was not prosecuted for breaking the law.

6. Mrs Wendy Scurr, nurse, tour guide and Ambulance Officer, rang the police at 1.32 pm to report the shooting. She and other medics then cared for the injured and the dead without any police protection for six and a half hours. Who ordered the armed police to stop at Tarana, where they had a barbecue? The police who arrived by boats were a stone’s throw away from the main crime scene, the cafe, and they too failed to come in to see what was going on. Was this meant to increase the trauma of the survivors?

7. Three more shots were fired at Port Arthur at 6.30pm while Bryant was at Seascape. Who fired those shots?

8. Same Question – Different Answer. At a recent Forensics Seminar in Queensland where the Tasmanian Police forensic gun inspector, Gerard Dutton, gave a lecture, the first question came from Mr Ian McNiven. He asked if there was any empirical evidence to link Martin Bryant to the Broad Arrow Cafe. Sargent Dutton immediately closed the 15 minute question time and would not reply. When McNiven managed to say “I have here Graham Collyer’s police statement…”, Sgt Dutton threatened him with arrest and called for security agents to escort McNiven out of the building.

When Dutton was asked the same question in America by a Doctor at a seminar, he replied truthfully – “There is no empirical evidence to link Bryant to the cafe.”

9. Yet a police video tape exists which proves that the police had an excellent opportunity to get DNA samples and finger prints of the gunman. The video briefly shows the blue sports bag on a cafe table. The gunman had carried his 3 rifles in this bag and left it right next to his drinking glass, his Solo soft drink can, knife, fork, plate, video cameras, etc. Why did the police fail to take DNA samples and finger prints?

10. According to the official story, Bryant first killed David and Sally Martin at Seascape Cottage in the morning, then went on to Port Arthur. Yet two policemen have reported seeing a naked woman with black hair, screaming and running from one building to another at Seascape well into the afternoon. If Sally Martin was dead, who was this woman?

11. Proof of other gunmen in Seascape Cottage. While Bryant was calmly talking to police by telephone in the cottage during the ‘siege’ and the conversation was recorded, someone else fired an SKK rifle 20 times. In the transcript the gunfire is recorded as ‘coughs’ but an electronic analysis of one of the ‘coughs’ shows that it was an SKK shot.

12. Two More Very Handy Seminars. On the Sunday morning, some 25 specialist doctors (Royal Australian College of Surgeons) from all over Australia had attended a training course in Hobart, and their last lecture was on Terrorist Attack and Gunshot Wounds. They stayed on to take care of the wounded victims.

13. Also, more than 700 reporters from 17 nations came to a seminar in Hobart. They were asked to arrive during the week-end as the seminar was due to begin early on Monday morning. How handy to have 700 scribblers churning out their anti-gun and disarmament propaganda to the whole world!

14. “There will never be uniform Gun Laws in Australia until we see a massacre somewhere in Tasmania” said Barry Unsworth, NSW Premier, December, 1987 at a conference in Hobart. Prophecy or Planning?

15. “If we don’t get it right this time (gun laws) next time there is a massacre, and there will be, then they’ll take all our guns off us”, said the deputy prime minister, Tim Fischer in May 1996. Who is the “THEY” who would order the removal of our guns? Did Fischer let slip that gun confiscation has been ordered by someone other than our own leaders?



a look back at australias own massacre that led to massive gun control and hand ins..understand that not every anomaly means there is a conspiracy..but if you put enough together into one place then a story can emerge..

and keep in mind that this never went to trial to be tested in front of a judge and the courts..

please look at the image at the top to see just what this left handed man with an IQ of 66 managed to do in very very quick time..


~ by seeker401 on January 1, 2013.

86 Responses to “15 facts about The Port Arthur Massacre you NEED to know”

  1. Nothing ever added up with that. Didn’t a guy over there say if they were to ever ban guns they would need a massacre there? False flag written all over it. They come up with stuff like this to disarm and take our liberties away. I think the US learned a lot from this.

    • Look at point 14 I think it was.

    • I can not believe a wealthy lawyer has not taken this case to get a name for themselves. Or how many have tried that we do not know about and have been either paid off or threatened this is quite common even in your local council

    • I know millatants from Iraq did.this and two asio where there at the time and Martin has a iq of 60 and no trial in court

      • Now you tell me how can a person with a iq of 60 do this I know a lot more better believe .friends in.a agency told me

  2. I can not believe how blind and nieve the australian public is. If the small minority of the people supporting brian had the power to be heard by the governments media and use of the tax payers dollars, Then we would have a fair fight.
    I have never heard of such a severe sentencing towards an australian on such a botched case, take Ivan millat for example the stories pop up for entertainment once or twice a year on television. What about opening old wounds for those families? Look at the huge and ongoing investagations in his case, but yet Brians is shut and sealed for thirty years.
    One more irrelevent example is the plane that flew into the pentagon i find it hard to believe they have next to no footage of this in a world full of survalence camera’s. The government’s major power is with holding information

    • if you even thought to question this story in mainstream you would be labelled a crackpot and your name blackened..its a suicide wish thats why noone complains or questions it..its left to us on the fringe to cry for truth..the pentagon hit was a missile..the most filmed building in the world and nobody has one piece of footage..thats your litmus test right there..

  3. I have only just learned the facts of this case. I was only 13 when this happened. After learning about the sandy hook hoax, I heard people compare it to port Arthur. This never occured to me before. After reading your post and others’, I am completely shocked. How could such a blatant disregard for justice be allowed? Why did no one stand up for Martin? He has the intellectual ability of a 10-13 yr old. We were completely duped.

    • A lot of things don’t add up on that day. The case never went to trial! There is no reason we are immune from false flag events. Australia gave up its guns after PA…

  4. This may be adding fuel to the fire. I am not all that up on the balistics of the unfortunate massacre at Port Arthur so i looked to do some research from another direction. I have as most of us free thinkers been, checking out the relevant facts of the New World Order.

    1 Bilderberg group links Rothschilds and other such old family money: too
    2 Oxford university which in turn has the Rhodes scholarships Prime Minister Bob Hawke was a Rhodes Scholar, Aust labour party Leader. So what i here you all screaming
    .3 Harold Wilson was also a Oxford man as well as being British Prime minister : Here the twist, Who do you think worked on his campaign to get him elected and leading the country?:


    So what do we have Here 2 Australian Prime Ministers from different sides of political spectrum with a relationship with a 3rd Prime minister of a different country all througth old money Oxford and the Bilderberg group; p.s Harold wilson was a member of the Bilderberg group. So is it to much of a strech that Little Johnny was just itching for a an exuse to NOT ONLY GET RID OFF MILITARY RIFLES BUT ANYTHING SEMI AUTO EVEN IF IT WAS ONLY 3 ROUNDS. dont know appreciate your thoughts just hope 35 people were not executed for some power trip.

    • they managed to take rifles and guns off of even country Australians very easily after port arthur..the fact this guy, who is almost retarded, never went to trial..sets off alarm bells for me..

      nice connection on hawke and howard..note abbott is also a rhodes scholar..

  5. little johhny will be remembered for GST (that we were not having) & sanctioning PA

    • little johhny will be remembered for GST (that we were not having)


      John Howard was re-elected leader of the Liberal party in 1995, and pledged “never, ever” to introduce the GST. Howard led the Liberal-National Coalition to a large victory in the 1996 federal election. However, before the 1998 election, Howard proposed a GST that would replace all existing sales taxes, as well as applying to all goods and services.

      just to be accurate..1998 election was the GST election..nothing hidden..the people should have said no if they didnt want it..there was as swing but it wasnt big enough..howard will be remembered for the GST no doubt but also for the disarming of australia and scary eyebrows..

      & sanctioning PA

      both sides support israel lefty..dont fall for the fake left/right paradigm..



      The last week has proved more than any that we are fortunate to live in a country like Australia. And for us women, there has never been a time to be more proud to be a member of the Zionist sisterhood.

      At a time when it seems Israel is dropping friends at an exponential rate it conjures great comfort and pride that two of Australia’s political trailblazers have come out in full force to stand up for the cause they deem just, regardless of the backlash in their wake. That these two stalwarts are women is even more inspiring for us females.

      Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard delivered an outstanding address at the recent Emirates Centre for Strategic Studies and Research (ECSSR) held in Abu Dhabi. Echoing sentiments of her address to a packed crowd at the Beth Weizmann Community Centre last November, Ms Gillard was firm and courageous in her analysis of the Middle East. You can watch the full address here.

      “I am convinced that the key to peace for Israelis and Palestinians is a simple declarative statement by Palestinian leaders – that they accept Israel as a Jewish State. Once that is stipulated, then virtually everything can be successfully negotiated — because Israel’s existential identity is successfully secured.”


      Julia Gillard says she arrived at her views about Israel well before her partner Tim Mathieson took a job with the Israel lobbyist Albert Dadon.

      Her partner had his own career and ”he’s got a right to live his life”, the Prime Minister said.

      Mr Dadon, the chairman of the property developer Ubertas and the founder of the Australia Israel Leadership Forum, said last night the decision to offer Mr Mathieson a property sales consultant job ”was made entirely by myself with the specific aim of filling a vacancy for the role”.

      Ms Gillard had disclosed to the register of interests held by members of parliament that Mr Mathieson had begun work with Ubertas in November 2009.

      In June 2009, she and Mr Mathieson had led a group of Australian politicians including the Liberals Christopher Pyne and Peter Costello, in Jerusalem at the first Australia Israel Leadership Forum.

      At a second forum in December 2009, also addressed by Kevin Rudd, she acknowledged Mr Dadon and his wife for their support of the forum.

      Mr Dadon said Mr Mathieson’s role at Ubertas involved directly addressing customer inquiries, mostly from Australian investors and buyers, ”rather than overseas buyers”.

      ”Mr Mathieson is not involved in any way shape or form in the planning process or applications for any of our developments,” Mr Dadon said.

      A former Australian ambassador to Israel, Ross Burns, on Monday accused Ms Gillard of being silent on the ”excesses” of Israel and questioned why Mr Mathieson had been given the job by Mr Dadon.

    • You forget though he went to an election on it & won exceptionally well, as that is what the majority of Australians WANTED, or doe’s not that mean anything to you, or don’t you think a majority vote counts, as you are a probably a Leftarded Unionise Num – Nut aye

  6. No trial? He confessed.
    There is video footage of Martin Bryant with a rifle in the car park.
    He stole a car from the toll booth and drove it to the house he held up in
    The car was found burnt out. Kind of places him at the scene of the crime he shoot all the passengers.
    He was identified by witnesses.
    He was arrested after running out of the house on fire where 3 dead bodies were. Just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
    The cafe was tightly packed his remarkable accuracy is because the average distance his victims were away from him was 2 feet or point blank Hard to miss. His accuracy dropped off when he went out side.
    He may have been mentally handicapped but it doesn’t take a lot of brains to load a gun point it at people and shoot them. Also people with mental handicaps can be good at some things doesn’t make them terrible at everything the guy could operate a fire arm.
    A lot of your “facts” are incorrect and un substantiated where a your references?

    Yes you are right Howard staged it to bring in 10% gst tax. And take your guns.

    You cunts are sad and need to get a life.
    Get off your computer take off your tin foil hats and go outside for once I promise the illuminati are not coming to get you. Fuckwits

    • Where are your references dipshit? You probably think 2 planes can bring down 3 buildings as well? Take off your nappy and wake up. Your living a child slaves dream world. And I didn’t write the article you ignorant piece of shit so take your mock outrage to MySpace or something.

    • refute the 15 points above with references, or stfu.

      • Why are you attacking someone for having an alternative point of view? He has raised a number of valid points, if you can’t handle having your conspiracy theory questioned then you’re obviously on shaky ground. It amazes me how conspiracy nuts are the first to label non-believers as “sheeple” or somehow living in a dream world and yet they are willing to believe every bit of rubbish they read on Internet without question. The Port Arthur conspiracy, on the surface, seems to raise some interesting points but many of them are pretty questionable if you look at it from both sides. I’m not saying it’s all bullshit necessarily but at the same time you should allow room in your belief system to give credence to both sides of the argument before you jump to conclusions.

        • You are not a very sound debater yourself – the earlier poster said
          “You cunts are sad and need to get a life.”..
          i think it is apt he get countered with the same sh*t.

        • if you come around with honest questions, you will have your honest inquiry treated sincerely and honestly. but if you want to just call people names, you have to have something more than a few strung-together “facts.”

          seek republished a well researched article on the subject. the poster insists, in his name, that seek is a ‘retard’ and later states that he is a cunt, a tin-foil hatter, and a fuckwit. you refer to this as “questioning.”

          as usual, there is no common starting point for these ‘discussions.’ aware people recognize that intelligence agencies create spectacle, unaware people do not recognize that fact, and the willfully ignorant simple refuse to recognize that fact.

          therefore, when there is a spectacle, reasonable people include intelligence action as a possible cause. unreasonable people exclude it out of hand. one position is based on factual history and the other is based on fear, hate, and nationalism.

        • We await his references to back up his claims as he demanded from the article. He also called us “cunts” so you gotta expect something in return. Did you forget to read that? And you also have just called us “nuts”. We don’t believe everything we read on the net. That’s a cliched standard attack from the hypnotized mob.

    • he pleaded innocent, then the government fired his lawyer and psychologist and appointed him new ones and locked him in solitary for 6 months which is when they got a confession and he pleaded guilty then without trial which he is still entitled to they get threw him back in solitary, and it is a matter of fact that after 60 days of isolation you can loose you mind, what did they do to him in those 6 months, there is no record.

  7. […] https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2013/01/01/15-facts-about-the-port-arthur-massacre-you-need-to-know/… […]

  8. crap the bastard shouldve been shot not costing tax payers to keep the low life may he go to hell and back. Rot in jail bryant

    • there was no trial, no psychical evidence and witnesses only described him after the media illegally posted his picture in the paper describing what he wore in that picture which if you see the video evidence is not what the gunman is wearing.

      this is why we have trials which Byrant was denied and only pleaded guilty and confessed after 6 months in solitary which in that time you can get any one to admit to anything especially if your a psychologist appointed by the government after the one you paid for was sacked by the courts. not to mention they did the same with his lawyer so they could feed him bad legal advice.

  9. Take “fact 3” off your materials. It is not fact it is pure fantasy. I was there when the truck was built, I know the history of the truck and also the history of 20 years of contractual arguments and disputes the builders/owners of the truck had with the state govt. The truck was not designed/built for involvement in any conspiracy and you undermine any other arguments you have by continuing to present “fact 3”. The truck is and always has been the private property of a private contractor. It was built to assist in large accidents such as a bus or a plane crash. The State govt and the emergency services ridiculed the builder/owner for building the truck. The truck, and the people who built/operated it had nothing to do with a conspiracy. They are a normal, suburban family, who have worked 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for two decades providing an excellent service to Tasmanians. For their dedication and committment they spent a large part of their contracted time being bullied and harrassed by the govt dept that administered their contract. You have no right to repeat the same lies and bs allegations about the trucks use and history. Who the hell are you to perpetuate the continued slur on these people? What evidence? What research? Where do the allegations originate from? By all means continue your PAM conspiracy campagin if that is your big mission in life but ffs leave these people, and their reputation alone. Do you seriously believe that mother and father small business operators living in one of Tasmania’s lower socio economic subrubs are party of a govt conpisracy to murder people. Just stop it. I am sick of people who have not bothered to do any research into this matter continuing to present this as fact when it is complete and utter rubbish. If you had any contact with the people who built/owned/operated the truck you would not believe “fact” 3 at all. It is pretty fucking disgraceful that you can continue to perpetuate the myth of the truck’s purpose without getting off your ass to look into the truth.

    Adam Charlton

    • Never was it worded as a personal attack on the builders/contractors that assembled the truck until you worded it that way Adam. It wouldn’t matter if it were a factory item from ford/holden, the manufacturers were never in question, it was only ever questioned as to why all of a sudden our state would need such a purpose built vehicle. If like you mention the vehicle was produced in case of a large plane/bus disaster, how did the risk of this occurrence lose its likelihood after Port Arthur, I fail to see the justification there if your statement is correct.

      • nice post..good points..where is the multi purpose truck now..not needed?

        • its in my backyard and its been used as a personal tow truck it was sold about a month ago and moved too QLD the guy who sold it apparently was very chatty not exactly the kind of person you want for a conspiracy theory ,also the trucks been stripped down since and is getting rebuild we were told of its interesting history but it didn’t really matter as me and my father just wanted a good work truck he also said it was used too pick up the bodies from the local hospitals weather or not that’s true or what its intended use was for i don’t know. but it hasnt vanished and its been given a new life.

          • so..just to get this right..the tasmanian govt wanted a multi purpose truck for multiple deaths before the massacre..but have had no use for one since?

            • i can’t say what the tazzie government did or didn’t do with it ,i’m just here to say hey the thing still exists because i’m working on it. i read somewhere on another website saying

              ”Update 8th May 2001 –
              The latest info reported to this site on this morgue truck is the owner was unable to sell it and 6 weeks ago the mortuary box on the back was removed and put on a Mercedes Army truck – then both vehicles disappeared. That was just after the details of this morgue truck were publicly disclosed by the investigator at a public meeting in Queensland.
              What was an Army truck doing with it ? And isn’t the timing of its disappearance strange – trying to hide something ? Is there an Army connection to what happened at Port Arthur ? ”

              that’s because it didn’t disappear it was just repurposed as a farm truck then sold again. when it was bought the refrigerated unit was removed at my father request because we didn’t need it in february 2016. we just wanted the flatbed. idk whats what with the military part but the military has a large budget if they needed a body truck they would have used their own, i would think.
              This will probably be the last time i comment about it since it doesn’t bother me ,and i was just looking into the truck’s history as a novelty thing and i came across this i wanted too clear that up for everyone. the truck still exists and that’s all i know.

            • Seeker401 re your comment about the mortuary truck, as I understand it, it had nothing to do with the Tasmanian government, it was built as a private venture to be used if there was a serious transport crash?

  10. […] 15 facts about The Port Arthur Massacre you NEED to know […]

  11. […] 15 facts about The Port Arthur Massacre you NEED to know […]

  12. I am a left handed shooter. I have fired a few rounds from an AR-15/M-16 and also fired an FN-SLR rifle for many years, never had a problem with the ejected brass!. Entirely plausible for a left handed shooter to do it, also evidently the café was very small and crowded, patrons did not realise what was going on for a while

  13. […] https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2013/01/01/15-facts-about-the-port-arthur-massacre-you-need-to-know/… […]

  14. Martin Bryant police interview footage emerges 20 years on

    For almost twenty years Australia’s most notorious mass murderer was seen, but never heard.

    The full extent of Port Arthur gunman Martin Bryant’s twisted, child-like mind has now been revealed, with never-before-seen police interview footage surfacing.

    The video shows police questioning Bryant while he is handcuffed to a chair, moments after being arrested.

    Bryant giggles and smiles at detectives, who recount the murder of 35 people, including a three-year-old girl.

    Asked if he remembers Sunday, April 28 1996, the then 28-year-old replies: “No, I don’t. Was that the day I suppose everyone’s talking about?”.

    “What would you think about a person who has killed 35 people?” a detective asks, showing him crime scene photos of the dead.

    “That’s a wicked, awful horrendous thing. I don’t know. And they reckon others were injured? And you reckon I’ve got something to do with this?” Bryant replies, struggling to contain a smile.

    He needles the detectives to tell him how many people were injured, delighting in being told the final number, “approximately 20”.

    Six months after the massacre, Bryant, who was deemed to have “borderline subnormal” intelligence, wrote a full confession in crayon, sparing the families of the victims a full trial.

    Bryant has never said why he went on the shooting rampage and has never expressed remorse.

    He is serving 1035 years without parole in the maximum security wing of Tasmania’s Risdon Prison.

    Late last year he was photographed in the Risdon prison yard by The Daily Telegraph, his now obese frame and bald head a far cry from the long blonde hair and youthful face of Australia’s most notorious killer.

  15. The people in the café didn’t realise what was going for a while? How long is a while? He didn’t shoot for very long, whoever he is. Because to shoot 29 times, and get 19 head shots, 20 fatalities and 12 injuries. While covering the area of the café and keeping count of the shots is accurate beyond the capacity of anything else I’ve ever heard about in the Western World. With no shots missing and as the magazine held 30, and one person in there wasn’t shot, do you think he left the bullet in from specialised training with a reason? While reloading. And they did try to get away, thus the number of them at the back door that wouldn’t open.

    Not to mention he then took out two cars. As in rendered the engines useless. Driver and car in three shots; where might you learn that?

    The shooting ability at Seascape is the other end of the spectrum. Someone who couldn’t hit anything. Also curiously, how can you possibly say he looks different now to the long blonde hair youthful face of Australia’s most notorious killer. How do you know he had long blonde hair? Or are you forgetting he sustained 3rd degree burns before being taken to hospital? You’re belief of how he looked is based on the photo the newspaper printed.

    Well there’s enough to throw the case out of court.

    • It only takes 15 seconds to empty the magazine on that thing! And some bullets, the solid points hit more than one person. Not hard! Was also using a different gun at Seascape.

      • 20 dead in 90 seconds..i would imagine after about 30 seconds of mayhem there wouldnt have been many still sitting at tables with their heads at the same height?

  16. worth a read


  17. Talk about shutting the gate after the horse has bolted, its all moot now isn’t it. He is in Jail, the guns are gone……well most of them. Except for the stash’s and criminals, and now we all eat a shit sandwich. Seriously though you might start listening to the people that were there and involved a little more than someone who read something or said something completely out of context. Mostly the government and some of the people said we cant let Australia become like America, full of nut jobs with access to high powered rifles with NO other purpose than killing humans. You want to get your rocks off shooting automatics join the army.

  18. Martin Bryant’s mother now believes he is guilty


    Martin Bryant’s mother now believes her son was responsible for the Port Arthur massacre that left 35 people dead despite previously suggesting he may not have even been there, her biographer and friend says.

    Carleen Bryant has rarely spoken publicly about the 1996 rampage, apart from her biography My Story released in 2010 and an interview with 60 Minutes, shortly after the book’s release.

    In the 2011 interview she appeared to cast doubt on her son’s guilt, saying there was “no evidence” he was at Port Arthur and some witnesses “didn’t recognise the gunman as being Martin Bryant”.

  19. Very interesting reading

  20. Let me guess, you’re against the current gun laws. You do realise there were witnesses who identified Bryant, yes? I knew David and Sally Martin, and your point number 10 is ridiculous, she didn’t even have dark hair so to imply this mystery woman was Sally is beyond stupid! You conspiracy theorist, tin hats are being unbelievably disrespectful to those who lost their lives, their families, their friends, and the survivors. If you want gun laws like in America, move there.

    • Same nonsense we hear about 9/11 – seeking the truth is somehow “disrespectful” to the victims.

      And of course, that’s utter nonsense. It’s just something that hateful people say either out of stupidity or malice.

      Yes, we’ll be keeping ours in the USA. Most of the horrific gun attacks you hear about are fake. Even someone as mainstream as Naomi Wolf has questioned the veracity of incidents like Sandy Hook.

    • nobody is disputing bryant being there..just his ability to do what a superior marksman would struggle to do..

      and nothing ever went to trial so nothing was ever proved or proven..

      Let me guess, you’re against the current gun laws.

      i dont own a gun..never have and never will so your fucking incorrect..

  21. So why did he admit to it? All the money in the world is useless to him..

    • you’ve never heard of a false or coerced confession, particularly in the case of someone who is mentally disabled?

    • look at how to make a murderer, the Steven Avery and Brandon Darcy case, they got his nephew to admit to assisting in the murder by planting the right questions and ideas in hi head, even telling him he will get in trouble if he didn’t do it there way, his mother and lawyer were denied attendance during the interviews, he also has a low IQ and is sitting in prison for a crime he didn’t commit, there was no blood at the scene and Steven Avery (the alleged killer) was arrested for the murder before they found the body giving them time to plant it.

      OK this one was in the US but it shows what a dedicated government can do to stitch someone up for anything they want.

  22. Bloody hell, here we go with another conspiracy theory. Boooring! FB wouldn’t survive without these bs stories. Always look for the agenda behind the post, and there it is, hits you right in the face, items 13 and 14. This is the Pro Gun Lobby at work here why don’t they put their name on this drivel. How in the hell would a NSW Premier predict an event accurately as happening in Tasmania 9 years prior to the event. Gimme a break. Seriously FB why do you let this rubbish stay on the site and you ban other more sensible stuff.

  23. Google this and then look at him and the series of events. Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) I beleive he/his alternate personality did do it as I beleive he suffered from this among other things, he had a long history of mental illness and had signs of DID at an early age. I don’t beleive it was a set up but the police etc definitely used it to further their own agenda of gun control, which is why their stories were conflicting.They would not look at mental illness as it would not have served their purpose. He was a victim and my heart breaks for him. They locked him away in solitary, but he is not alone, he has to live with an alternate personality that hates him. He had also referred to himself by another name.

  24. What a load of bullshit! What about the witnesses that saw him. Idiots. Conspiracy theories and false science.

  25. A dog act to violate our human rights
    They forgot to mention this is the only way to remove the people’s power by removing gun’s the government have even more control over us.

  26. watch and listen to this! if you still believe he carried out this on his own you are more simple than Bryant.

  27. omg just omg you werent there. i sat the 000 calls when he did the shootings, you bloody conspiricy theorists have nothing better to do than dredge up this shit over and over again.

  28. How can we get to the truth, the government,wants the people to forget about that now that they have GOT there way with gun control ,

  29. You are an idiot!

  30. Utter crap. Disrespectful beyond belief. You should be ashamed to peddle this tripe.

  31. What utter rubbish. I knew Kate Scott and her boyfriend Mike. He looked into Martin Bryant’s eyes in the Broadwater cafe when Bryant shot Kate (his girlfriend) dead at close range.He was also grazed by a bullet in the masacre. Martin Bryant is definately the right killer here.

  32. At the time of the Port Arthur Massacre , I was a licensed firearms dealer ,at my home town LIGHTNING RIDGE .I ,like most people had heard on the radio , by john howard , that he would have a firearms books drawn up so that all firearms in Australia could be recorded and licensed to their owners . Well within four days of that statement I received all of the books to do this job, now it takes two days by post to get mail from Sydney , so do you think howard got them done in that time ,OR ,were they done in advance.

    • interesting..might be nothing sinister but if they were already printed and waiting to go once the right crisis occurred then we have a small anomaly..

  33. In this country, we are told that a person is innocent until proven guilty. There are too many anomalies to allow this case to be buried. It may well be that this is what the authorities wish.

  34. I think I’m gay.

  35. […] 15 facts about The Port Arthur Massacre you NEED to know https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2013/01/01/15-facts-about-the-port-arthur-massacre-you-need-to-know/… […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: