Here come the pedophilia apologists


In 1976 the National Council for Civil Liberties, the respectable (and responsible) pressure group now known as Liberty, made a submission to parliament’s criminal law revision committee. It caused barely a ripple. “Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in with an adult,” it read, “result in no identifiable damage … The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.”

It is difficult today, after the public firestorm unleashed by revelations about Jimmy Savile and the host of child abuse allegations they have triggered, to imagine any mainstream group making anything like such a claim. But if it is shocking to realise how dramatically attitudes to paedophilia have changed in just three decades, it is even more surprising to discover how little agreement there is even now among those who are considered experts on the subject.

A liberal professor of psychology who studied in the late 1970s will see things very differently from someone working in child protection, or with convicted sex offenders. There is, astonishingly, not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm.

Continue here:


i knew this was coming..have known it for a decade..this is the start..time to get off this planet..please dont be fooled by any of this..pedophilia is a sick evil crime that has no place in any society..under any circumstances..ever!


~ by seeker401 on January 7, 2013.

12 Responses to “Here come the pedophilia apologists”

  1. […] Here come the pedophilia apologists ( […]


    After a national backlash from social conservatives, the American Psychiatric Association (ASA) has dropped its designation of pedophilia as a “sexual orientation.”

    In May, the APA released the Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). In this document, the first new edition in 10 years, the APA described pedophilia as a sexual “orientation.”

    But within days, the APA changed the classification, noting in a press release “’Sexual orientation’ is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error and should read ‘sexual interest.’”

  3. a bit off the topic… this was sent to a neighborhood mailing list i am on….

    “This an update about the meeting of polyamorous political activists
    happening on Feb 23, 2014, in Berkeley, California (USA). We had a good
    crowd last year (about 50 people), and it was very productive, so we are
    doing it again this year.

    Much of significance seems to be happening on the political front
    that concerns poly people.

    For instance, in California, a few weeks back, the state legislature
    approved a law making it legal for a child to have three (or more) legal
    parents, and the law was signed by the Governor. Although the issues that
    inspired this law were not specifically related to polyamory, the existence
    of such a law has obvious implications for poly families. (Several other
    jurisdictions currently have similar laws, and more may be under

    In Oregon, a judge recently granted legal custody of a child to an openly
    polyamorous family – despite the court being fully aware of the polyamorous
    character of the family. The court did this over the vocal objections of
    people who were fiercely against the idea.

    In countries such as Brazil and Holland, government officials have legally
    sanctioned domestic partnerships that include three or more people. In
    Kenya, a woman officially married two simultaneous husbands, with the full
    knowledge and blessing of both husbands. (The jury is still out on whether
    the Kenyan government will ultimately accept this or not).

    There are several lawsuits in various stages attempting to decriminalize
    polygamy in the US, Canada, and elsewhere. Most of these are driven by
    Mormon polygamists, not polyamorous people, and the outcome remains
    uncertain. However, the way this all eventually plays out could have
    profound implications for polyamorous people.

    There have already been several articles in very conservative
    publications lamenting that polyamory has already made remarkable progress
    towards becoming a mainstream phenomena.

    • Poly people. The flyer seems to be apologists for Mormons really, I don’t see how they differentiate.

      • polyamory is a more overarching than just covering mormons. i’ve met several ‘poly’ people around here … the question i always ask myself when they are talking about it is “how the heck do you have that much time on your hands?” mormons are mainly concerned with one-man-many-women marriages, while the polys around here tend to be males and females, often living in large houses as a group.

        what i found interesting was the policy analysis… california allows more than 2 legal parents? i wonder what the end game is here… can a corporation be named a parent?

  4. Seek, what do you think of the symbols in this Polyamorous Productions LLC –

    what a freaking sick a** world we are living in, imo of course, truly sick and perverted

    xxx, seems you’re pretty darn close, maybe not a corporation being a parent yet, but certainly the birth of another ‘satanic’ industry.

  5. The Polyamory Society is a nonprofit organization that was founded to support, defend and promote Polyamorists, Polyamory Families, Children of the Polyamory Lifestyle and the Polyamory Institution worldwide. The Polyamory Society was established on 6 June 1996 in Washington DC at Shephard Park Branch Library by a group of Polyamorists committed to helping to right social injustices. On September 6, 7 and 8 1996 in the face of a hurricane passing through at the East Coast Gathering at The Church of Four Quarters ATC and Four Quarters Farm in Artemis, Pennsylvania the organizational structure and membership guidelines were created.

    Reichian Therapy

  6. Socialistic slave invents and will all these degenerating relations between these semi-humans.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: