“Hitler was a Zionist” claim gets Ken Livingstone suspended from Labour..Labour councilors suspended over “anti-Israel” social media posts



Former London mayor Ken Livingstone has been suspended from the Labour party after he said Hitler had supported Zionism, during an interview where he defended a colleague accused of anti-semitism.

Livingstone refused to apologize for his comments and said people should not confuse criticizing the Israeli government’s policies with being anti-Semitic after being confronted by Labour MP John Mann, who called him a “Nazi apologist” and claimed he was “rewriting history.”

The row, which was captured on video, broke out after the veteran politician went on BBC Radio London to defend MP Naz Shah who was accused of anti-Semitism over a series of Facebook posts.

“Let’s remember, when Hitler won his election in 1932 his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel,” Livingstone told BBC Radio London earlier on Thursday. “He was supporting Zionism before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.”

He later attempted to clarify his comments to the BBC and maintained that Naz Shah was not anti-Semitic: “I’ve heard a lot of people being critical of Israel, but if I was to denounce the South African government, you wouldn’t say I was racist – and one of my worries is this confusion with anti-Semitism and criticising the Israeli government policy undermines the importance of tackling real anti-Semitism.”

Shah apologized fully for promoting a Facebook post from 2014, which suggested relocating Israelis to America, but was later suspended.

Labour MPs including London mayoral candidate Sadiq Khan were quick to condemn Livingstone’s comments amid accusations by Prime Minister David Cameron that Labour “has got a problem with anti-Semitism”.


Two Labour councilors have been suspended over posts criticizing Israel, including likening human rights abuses of Palestinians by the Jewish state to the treatment of Jews by Nazi Germany, as well as blaming Israel for the US Sandy Hook shootings.

Nottingham City councilor Ilyas Aziz had shared the controversial Facebook posts back in 2014, which were discovered by political website Guido Fawkes.

One post read: “Jews and Muslims lived together in the Middle East, in peace pre-1948. Perhaps it would have been wiser to create Israel in America, it’s big enough. They could relocate even now.”

Local Blackburn councilor Salim Mulla was reportedly suspended 30 minutes after Aziz for Facebook posts from last year where he shared a conspiracy theory video claiming Israel was responsible for the Sandy Hook atrocity and said it is playing a “Zionism game”.

The latest suspensions come a day after Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn said the party is “united” against anti-Semitism.

“We stand absolutely against anti-Semitism in any form,” Corbyn said during a May Day rally.


the uk labour party is struggling with some demons of truth..and the leaders are hitting back hard..”if you want to know who rules you”..you know the rest..

We stand absolutely against anti-Semitism in any form,” Corbyn said during a May Day rally.”

and this is what got livingstone into trouble:

Let’s remember, when Hitler won his election in 1932 his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel,” Livingstone told BBC Radio London earlier on Thursday.”


~ by seeker401 on May 4, 2016.

17 Responses to ““Hitler was a Zionist” claim gets Ken Livingstone suspended from Labour..Labour councilors suspended over “anti-Israel” social media posts”

  1. http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/05/03/463695/Zionist-corruption–UK-politics-/

  2. Before and after the “Holocaust”: Jewish population numbers in 1933 … World Almanac 1933. World Almanac 1948

    For over a century, the Jewish World Almanac has been widely regarded as the most authentic source for the world’s Jewish population numbers. Academics all over the world, including the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica, used to rely on the accuracy of those numbers. Here is what the World Alamanacs of 1933 and 1948 had to say about the world population of Jews.

    In other words, according to the World Almanac the world population of Jews increased (!) between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. If the German government under Adolf Hitler had – as alleged – murdered six million Jews those losses should have been reflected in the Jewish population numbers quoted in the World Almanac.

    The suspicions raised by above numbers concerning the veracity of the allegations made against the Hitler government are confirmed by the official three-volume report by the International Committee of the Red Cross, released 1948 in Geneva, according to which 272,000 concentration camp inmates died in German custody, about half of them Jews. The following article elaborates….


  3. World Almanac numbers of Jews explained

    The World Almanac series of books sometimes provided two sets of figures for the world Jewish population. One came from the AJC (American Jewish Committee), and the other is the World Almanac’s own estimation.

    1933 : 15,316,359 (AJC), page 419
    1934 : ???
    1935 : ???
    1936 : 15,753,633, page 748
    1937 : ???
    1938 : 15,748,091 (AJC), page 510
    1939 : uses 1938 data
    1940 : 15,290,983 (AJC), page 519; 15,319,359 (Almanac), page 129
    1941 : uses 1938 data
    1942 : 15,192,089, page 849
    1943 : uses 1942 data
    1944 : uses 1942 data
    1945 : 15,688,259 (AJC), page 494; 15,xxx,xxx (Almanac), page xxx
    1946 : uses 1945 data (AJC), page 488; 15,xxx,xxx (Almanac), page xxx
    1947 : uses 1945 data (AJC), page 219; 15,690,000 (Almanac), page 748
    1948 : uses 1945 data (AJC), page 249; 15,753,638 (Almanac), page 849
    1949 : n/a (AJC); 15,713,638 (Almanac), page 289
    1950 : n/a (AJC); n/a (Almanac)

    In 1949, the AJC didn’t provide an estimation for that year, instead, they revised the number of Jews for 1939 and 1947:

    1949 AJC revision for 1939 : 16,643,120, page 204
    1949 AJC revision for 1947 : 11,266,600, page 204

    After 1949, the World Almanac discontinued providing their own estimations, instead, they only reported the numbers given by AJC. In 1950, the AJC didn’t provide an estimation for that year, instead, they revised the number of Jews for 1948:

    1950 AJC revision for 1948 : 11,373,000, page 473

    So, let’s brief this quickly. The last available pre-war number comes from 1938. In 1940, they somehow got a new estimation. In 1941, they use the 1938 number, not the 1940 number. In 1942, they got a new estimation, which was then used in both the 1943 and 1944 versions, until the war ended and they made a new estimation for 1945, which was then used for 1946, 1947 and 1948. In 1949, the Almanac made an estimation of their own, whereas the AJC decided to revise the 1947 number instead.

    15,688,259 – 11,266,600 = 4,421,659

    Hmm, 4,4 million missing Jews. No, that can’t be right. We all knew 6 million died before the Nuremberg Trials began anyway. So what to do? Well, the AJC had a great idea! They revised the 1939 number by adding 1 million Jews.

    895,029 to be precise. So:

    4,421,659 + 895,029 = 5,316,688

    Bingo. The official Holocaust story goes that somewhere from 5,4 to 6 million Jews died. The number was predetermined and the AJC played along. Somehow they knew, 10 years later in 1949, that the 1938 and 1939 numbers were wrong. No mention of their source, no mention of their methodology used. They just changed the number. Poof.
    Historians will tell you the added one million Jews comes from the Wannsee Conference, where the Nazis counted 11,000,000 Jews in Europe, but it is known that this number was exaggerated by roughly two million, therefore their point is moot. The additional one million are imaginary Jews, added for the sole purpose of having more Jews killed on paper. This is one of the essential bits of the lie that six million Jews died, but as we can, it couldn’t possibly be six million, but 4,4 million maximum.

    Now, this doesn’t mean 4,4 million Jews died, because they didn’t, it’s just that most Jews after the war spread all over the world, took gentile names and became crypto-Jews. What’s more, the AJC stopped reporting the actual number of Jews for current years, instead, they reported for two years back. Starting with 1949 when they “revised” the 1947 number, then in 1950 when they “revised” the 1948 number. They just kept “revising” the number of Jews two years back, ignoring the actual numbers. I wonder why?


  4. Yes there was a ” transfer agreement” at first where Hitler allowed the Jews to emigrate to Israel with their assets . It was negotiated with the top Zionists so Ken was telling the truth and Ken even agreed with the six million . Henry Makow just did an article on this .

  5. Anti-Semitism is a trick? Oh Dear!

    Arabs, including cultural Arabs such as Chaldeans, Akkadians, Assyrians, Aramaics, Phoenicians, and Syriacs, are the only living bloodline descendants of Abraham and the only true Semites, not converted Ashkenazic, Sephardic, Samaritan, African, European, and Indian Jews.

    Why non-Semitic Zionist Jews would use the term Semite to describe themselves is intriguing to say the least. However, upon close scrutiny the truth reveals itself.

    They must pretend to be the Chosen Semitic Hebrews of the bible – the real Hebrews are all dead – in order to steal the land of Palestine and treat the Palestinians as Untermensch.

    When facing criticism and condemnation for their barbaric policies against their Palestinian victims, their tactic is to hurl the cry-wolf accusation of anti-semitism in order to cower their opposition into submission. Furthermore, it doesn’t hurt that said accusation also camouflages their non-Hebraic, non-Semitic ancestry by making them appear to be Semites when they’re actually not.

    “It’s a trick, we always use it,” admitted Israeli Minister Shulamit Olani


  6. Documenting the ethnic cleansing of truth (and people) by the anti-Semitic Jews.


  7. They Are Not Like Us


    • great post thanks..

      Roughly 6 percent of the world’s population consists of people with Neanderthal genes. Jews fall into this category. This is why Jews have always been a problem: because their Neanderthal genes make them twice as aggressive as the rest of the world’s Cro-Magnon derived races.

  8. Chapter 4. The Decline and Fall of Esau’s Empire?

    Science, May 6, 2010 vindicates The Iceman Inheritance and Chosen People from the Caucasus, but beware of that “one to four percent” statistical spin.

    The May 6, 2010 issue of Science, Journal of the American Academy of Sciences, has finally confirmed that modern human populations have significant Neanderthal genetic admixture. This study by the Max Planck Institute of Leipzig under the overall leadership of Dr. Svante Paabo also included some researchers from the Harvard University School of Medicine.

    Behind the scenes, it seems that this DNA study’s dramatic reversal of the Paabo-Stoneking Cell article of July 15, 1997 insisting that there was no Neanderthal DNA in modern humans was due to the fact that Harvard researchers, notably geneticist Dr. David Reich, came up with data that contradicted the 1997 study by Svante Paabo (then at the University of Munich) and Mike Stoneking (then at the University of Pennsylvania).

    Personally, I have always suspected that this 1997 study was purposefully concocted or even commissioned to please North American Jews and to further Israeli interests. In the 1997 study, Svante Paabo and Mike Stoneking claimed to have re-created part of the Neanderthal DNA sequence to an “acceptable” extent (2%) and then to have compared it to modern human DNA (but the complete human genome wasn’t mapped until 2005). In short, Paabo and Stoneking were comparing nothing much to nothing at all. Dr. Alan Templeton, a geneticist at the American University in St. Louis, characterized their 1997 study as “a statistical house of cards.”

    At that time the acknowledged world expert on Neanderthals was Dr. Erik Trinkaus, formerly of the Anthropology Department at the University of New Mexico. His massive book The Neandertals was published in 1992 (Random House, and in two revised Vintage “University Format” paperback editions 1994 and 1996). Trinkaus chose to adopt the new German spelling system which hasn’t caught on among Germans. The Neandertals contained this observation in the concluding pages (March, 1994 Vintage paperback): “Only humans from the Near East and parts of Europe can claim Neandertals per se in their direct ancestry” (page 416, my emphasis).

    The 1997 Paabo-Stoneking study published in the July issue of Cell was highly promoted in North American media, contradicted Trinkaus, prevented Random House from issuing a cheaper mass-market paperback edition of The Neandertals in the Fall of 1997 and immediately enthroned Svante Paabo, in the public mind, instead of Erik Trinkaus as the world’s leading expert on Neanderthals. Naturally, the 1997 Paabo-Stoneking Cell article also discredited my own books The Iceman Inheritance (1978) and Chosen People from the Caucasus (1992) because I had concluded exactly what Trinkaus had concluded, only I had said it fourteen years earlier. This new May 2010 study concedes that from “1 to 4” percent of modern human DNA is Neanderthal. However, I see and smell a little loophole just large enough for a statistical rat. …

    Anyway, that’s the worldwide “Paabo spin” on Neanderthal DNA in modern humans and, looked at this way, “1 to 4 percent” doesn’t amount to much. Figures don’t lie but liars figure. …


  9. a must read:

    By Antony C. Sutton

    great info- source:
    check out the whole site, seek

    …I found this one, about the Basel Accords, quite important for instance: http://www.bilderberg.org/bis.htm#Intro

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: