Hillary Clinton, Google and SEO

http://www.smartcompany.com.au/technology/seo/71129-hillary-clinton-google-seo/?google_editors_picks=true

If you watched last week’s video, you saw how we’d found a curious discrepancy in Google’s auto complete results for Hillary Clinton. When you searched for “Hillary Clinton cri” in the U.S. relatively benign search phrases popped up, but on Google sites in the rest of the world we got results like Hillary Clinton criminal prosecution and Hillary Clinton crime video. Based on these results, it looked like Google was manipulating the auto-complete results in the U.S.

Google responded by emailing the Washington Post, claiming that the autocorrect feature cut out any responses that were “offensive or disparaging” when they showed their results. The problem with their response is that it appears to be a flat-out lie.

First of all, if the phrase is so offensive or disparaging, it wouldn’t show up in searches in every English-speaking country except the U.S. It would have been cut out worldwide if it was so insulting toward Hillary Clinton. In truth, the only place where it doesn’t show is in google.com’s search.

The other part of the untruth has to do with further statements made by Google. They state that auto-complete results are always based on search phrase popularity, based on locality. So logically, the most commonly searched-for phrase should show up at the top of the list. When you search google.com.au, it does just that. But when you use Google’s own tool, Google Trends, you can clearly see the missing phrases showing higher search volume than the ones that do appear when you search.

The bottom line? I don’t know exactly what’s going on with these results, but they’re fascinating to watch. I think it’s pretty far-fetched to believe that Google might be manipulating results for some unstated objective, if only because it’s being done in a really obvious manner.  I’m not even sure how you could hack the system to get those results, but it’s an interesting subject to watch.

———-

“When you searched for “Hillary Clinton cri” in the U.S. relatively benign search phrases popped up, but on Google sites in the rest of the world we got results like Hillary Clinton criminal prosecution and Hillary Clinton crime video. Based on these results, it looked like Google was manipulating the auto-complete results in the U.S.”

ermm..yeah..

“I don’t know exactly what’s going on with these results, but they’re fascinating to watch. I think it’s pretty far-fetched to believe that Google might be manipulating results for some unstated objective, if only because it’s being done in a really obvious manner.”

its not far fetched at all!

401

~ by seeker401 on July 8, 2016.

7 Responses to “Hillary Clinton, Google and SEO”

  1. http://www.groundzeromedia.org/2016/07/06/76-choosing-your-master-the-u-n-biased-vote/

  2. is all related with THEY
    y-day was 7-716=7 nxt time be 9years for now 7-725=7 one ofTheActiveShooter was 25 years old the reports be in 7Days probably is more

    Everywhere is going to hell the US w/ BLM, Europe w/ migrants, SA w/ the EFF, South America w/ Zika, west Africa w/ Boko Haram & Ebola
    reply
    #soros http://theafricanspear.com/2015/08/13/george-soros-funds-black-lives-matters-movement/http://www.naturalnews.com/051869_George_Soros_national_borders_migrant_invasion.htmlhttp://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/aug/11/blog-posting/bloggers-bill-and-melinda-gates-george-soros-funde/
    #Bilderberg #crookedHillary #peace

  3. http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/07/08/dallas-shooting-snipers-gladio-terror-drills-suspicious-details/

  4. https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

    • https://nworeport.me/2016/07/13/billionaire-paedophile-jeffrey-epstein-created-clinton-foundation/

      • However, his involvement in the Clinton Foundation is less clear.

        The former politician has always credited longtime assistant Doug Band, now the director of the Foundation, as coming up with the idea for the Global Initiative.

        Epstein is not listed in any of the official paperwork of the Clinton Global Initiative as either its founder or director.

        But there is evidence that the billionaire supported the Clinton Foundation financially.

        The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, reported data from a whistle-blower, that $81 million had been routed from HSBC Swiss accounts to The Clinton Foundation – including money from Epstein.

        Epstein, who had various Swiss accounts with HSBC totally $3.5 million, transferred $25,000 to the Foundation in 2006.

  5. https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/02/trump-pals-around-with-george-soros

    http://usmediacenter.com/soros-clinton-group-funded-violent-protests-damage-sanders-trump/

    http://moneymorning.com/2016/03/02/this-little-known-trump-soros-connection-will-surprise-you/

    http://pagesix.com/2009/12/25/sightings-790/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: