Making babies without eggs may be possible say scientists

_91176637_c0206627-sperm_and_ovum_artwork-spl

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-37337215

Scientists say early experiments suggest it may one day be possible to make babies without using eggs.

They have succeeded in creating healthy baby mice by tricking sperm into believing they were fertilising normal eggs.

The findings in Nature Communications, could, in the distant future, mean women can be removed from the baby-making process, say the researchers.

For now, the work helps to explain some of the details of fertilisation.

The University of Bath scientists started with an unfertilised egg in their experiments.

They used chemicals to trick it into becoming a pseudo-embryo.

These “fake” embryos share much in common with ordinary cells, such as skin cells, in the way they divide and control their DNA.

The researchers reasoned that if injecting sperm into mouse pseudo-embryos could produce healthy babies, then it might one day be possible to achieve a similar result in humans using cells that are not from eggs.

In the mouse experiments, the odds of achieving a successful pregnancy was one in four.

Dr Tony Perry, one of the researchers, told the BBC News website: “This is the first time that anyone has been able to show that anything other than an egg can combine with a sperm in this way to give rise to offspring.

“It overturns nearly 200 years of thinking.”

Those baby mice were healthy, had a normal life expectancy and had healthy pups of their own.

The goal of the researchers is to understand the exact mechanisms of fertilisation because what happens when a sperm fuses with an egg is still a bit of a mystery.

For example, the egg completely strips the sperm’s DNA of all its chemical clothing and re-dresses it.

That stops the sperm behaving like a sperm and makes it act like an embryo, but how the “costume change” takes place is not clear.

Removing the need for an egg could have a wider impact on society.

Dr Perry said: “One possibility, in the distant future, is that it might be possible that ordinary cells in the body can be combined with a sperm so that an embryo is formed.”

In other words, two men could have a child, with one donating an ordinary cell and the other, sperm.

Or one man could have his own child using his own cells and sperm – with that child being more like a non-identical twin than a clone.

Dr Perry stressed that such scenarios were still “speculative and fanciful” at this stage.

http://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms12676

———-

“The findings in Nature Communications, could, in the distant future, mean women can be removed from the baby-making process, say the researchers.”

of course..so natural..so normal..

“Dr Perry said: “One possibility, in the distant future, is that it might be possible that ordinary cells in the body can be combined with a sperm so that an embryo is formed.” In other words, two men could have a child, with one donating an ordinary cell and the other, sperm.

who are these maniacs?

brave new world eh?

401

~ by seeker401 on September 19, 2016.

6 Responses to “Making babies without eggs may be possible say scientists”

  1. who are these maniacs?

  2. who are these maniacs?

    Self hating degenerates who think they are ‘gods’. Perhaps one of the alternative scientists can invent a cure for them.

    University of Bath, previously known as the Society of Merchant Venturers,
    a private entrepreneurial and charitable organisation in the English city of Bristol.

    Venue claims that the Merchant Venturers control 12 charities and 40 trust funds, and also a private unlimited company, SMV Investments, that has major investments in defence contracting, tobacco, genetically modified agriculture and the petroleum industry.

    Merchant Venturers serve on the boards of many local charitable and cultural organisations, and are guaranteed seats on the University of Bristol Court and the Downs Committee. It quotes Paul Burton of the University’s School of Policy Studies as saying, “they exert quite a bit of influence and we, the people of Bristol, don’t know much about them and can’t hold them to account”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Merchant_Venturers

    Their coat of arms, or logo is rather gay and their organizations and their members are very secretive to say the least.

    Their motto seems to say everything one needs to know about the parasitic members, I imagine.

    “Indocilis Pauperiem Pati
    one who cannot learn to endure poverty (Horace)

  3. hmmm I think there’s much more to this Society of Merchants Ventures group and probably one very deep rabbit hole where you will find the same ‘deplorables’ as usual occupying most of the hole.

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-cORSqWiUAoJ:www.public-interest.co.uk/aseye/merchant.htm+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    interesting thread regarding this group and the others who have possible ties to them, although many of the links provided within the thread have been removed by google.

    https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=150997

  4. Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: