In the Democratic echo chamber inconvenient truths are recast as Putin plots


DONALD TRUMP, FOR reasons I’ve repeatedly pointed out, is an extremist, despicable, and dangerous candidate, and his almost-certain humiliating defeat is less than a month away. So I realize there is little appetite in certain circles for critiques of any of the tawdry and sometimes fraudulent journalistic claims and tactics being deployed to further that goal. In the face of an abusive, misogynistic, bigoted, scary, lawless authoritarian, what’s a little journalistic fraud or constant fearmongering about subversive Kremlin agents between friends if it helps to stop him?

But come January, Democrats will continue to be the dominant political faction in the U.S. — more so than ever — and the tactics they are now embracing will endure past the election, making them worthy of scrutiny. Those tactics now most prominently include dismissing away any facts or documents that reflect negatively on their leaders as fake, and strongly insinuating that anyone who questions or opposes those leaders is a stooge or agent of the Kremlin, tasked with a subversive and dangerously un-American mission on behalf of hostile actors in Moscow.

To see how extreme and damaging this behavior has become, let’s just quickly examine two utterly false claims that Democrats over the past four days — led by party-loyal journalists — have disseminated and induced thousands of people, if not more, to believe. On Friday, WikiLeaks published its first installment of emails obtained from the account of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta. Despite WikiLeaks’ perfect, long-standing record of only publishing authentic documents, MSNBC’s favorite ex-intelligence official, Malcolm Nance, within hours of the archive’s release, posted a tweet claiming — with zero evidence and without citation to a single document in the WikiLeaks archive — that it was compromised with fakes.

As you can see, more than 4,000 people have re-tweeted this “Official Warning.” That includes not only random Clinton fans but also high-profileClinton-supporting journalists, who by spreading it around gave this claim their stamp of approval, intentionally leading huge numbers of people to assume the WikiLeaks archive must be full of fakes, and its contents should therefore simply be ignored. Clinton’s campaign officials spent the day fueling these insinuations, strongly implying that the documents were unreliable and should thus be ignored. Poof: Just like that, unpleasant facts about Hillary Clinton disappeared, like a fairy protecting frightened children by waving her magic wand and sprinkling her dust over a demon, causing it to scatter away.

Except the only fraud here was Nance’s claim, not any of the documents published by WikiLeaks. Those were all real. Indeed, at Sunday night’s debate, when asked directly about the excerpts of her Wall Street speeches found in the release, Clinton herself confirmed their authenticity. And news outlets such as the New York Times and AP reported — and continue to report — on their contents without any caveat that they may be frauds. No real print journalists or actual newsrooms (as opposed to campaign operatives masquerading as journalists) fell for this scam, so this tactic did not prevent reporting from being done.

But it did signal to Clinton’s most devoted followers to simply ignore the contents of the release. Anyone writing articles about what these documents revealed was instantly barraged with claims from Democrats that they were fakes.

MORE INSIDIOUS AND subtle, but even worse, was what Newsweek and its Clinton-adoring writer Kurt Eichenwald did last night. What happened — in reality, in the world of facts — was extremely trivial. One of the emails in the second installment of the WikiLeaks/Podesta archive — posted yesterday — was from Sidney Blumenthal to Podesta. The sole purpose of Blumenthal’s email was to show Podesta one of Eichenwald’s endless series of Clinton-exonerating articles, this one about Benghazi. So in the body of the email to Podesta, Blumenthal simply pasted the link and the full contents of the article. Although the purpose of Eichenwald’s article (like everything he says and does) was to defend Clinton, one paragraph in the middle acknowledged that one minor criticism of Clinton on Benghazi was possibly rational.

Once WikiLeaks announced that this second email batch was online, many news organizations (including The Intercept, along with the NYT and AP) began combing through them to find relevant information and then published articles about them. One such story was published by Sputnik, the Russian government’s international outlet similar to RT, which highlighted that Blumenthal email. But the Sputnik story inaccurately attributed the text of the Newsweek article to Blumenthal, thus suggesting that one of Clinton’s closest advisers had expressed criticism of her on Benghazi. Sputnik quickly removed the article once Eichenwald pointed out that the words were his, not Blumenthal’s. Then, in his campaign speech last night, Trump made reference to the Sputnik article (hours after it was published and spread on social media), claiming (obviously inaccurately) that even Blumenthal had criticized Clinton on Benghazi.

That’s all that happened. There is zero suggestion in the article, let alone evidence, that any WikiLeaks email was doctored: It wasn’t. It was just Sputnik misreporting the email. Once Sputnik realized that its article misattributed the text to Blumenthal, it took it down. It’s not hard to imagine how a rushed, careless Sputnik staffer could glance at that email and fail to realize that Blumenthal was forwarding Eichenwald’s article rather than writing it himself. And while nobody knows how this erroneous Sputnik story made its way to Trump for him to reference in his speech, it’s very easy to imagine how a Trump staffer on a shoddy, inept campaign — which has previously cited InfoWars and white supremacist sites, among others — would have stumbled into a widely shared Sputnik story that had been published hours earlier on the internet and then passed it along to Trump for him to highlight, without realizing the reasons to be skeptical.

In any event, based on the available evidence, this is a small embarrassment for Trump: He cited an erroneous story from a non-credible Russian outlet, so it’s worth noting. But that’s not what happened. Eichenwald, with increasing levels of hysteria, manically posted no fewer than three dozen tweets last night about his story, each time escalating his claims of what it proved. By the time he was done, he had misled large numbers of people into believing that he found proof that: 1) the documents in the WikiLeaks archive were altered; 2) Russia put forgeries into the WikiLeaks archive; 3) Sputnik knew about the WikiLeaks archive ahead of time, before it was posted online; 4) WikiLeaks coordinated the release of the documents with the Russian government; and 5) the Russian government and the Trump campaign coordinated to falsely attribute Eichenwald’s words to Blumenthal.

In fact, Eichenwald literally has zero evidence for any of that. The point is not that his evidence for these propositions is inconclusive or unpersuasive; the point is that there is zero evidence for any of it. It’s all just conspiracy theorizing and speculation that he invented. Worse, the article, while hinting at these claims and encouraging readers to believe them, does not even expressly claim any of those things. Instead, Eichenwald’s increasingly unhinged tweets repeatedly inflated his insignificant story from what it was — a misattribution of an email by Sputnik that Trump repeated — into a five-alarm warning that an insidious Russian plot to subvert U.S. elections had been proven, with Trump and fake WikiLeaks documents at the center.

Continue here:


do yourself a favour and read the article..we are witnessing the most coordinated media collusion ever seen involving a US election..and i am not a trump supporter..far from it..but i can see with an unbiased eye and its criminal..and global..and controlled..

russia..the americans favorite bogeyman..has been for decades..and now whenever the DNC is caught in a corner over leaked emails they cry russian hackers and clam up..and the media allows it..

the emails are all real..

i dont care who turned on the worried about the cockroaches and rats now exposed, scurrying for darkness..


~ by seeker401 on October 14, 2016.

24 Responses to “In the Democratic echo chamber inconvenient truths are recast as Putin plots”

  1. more proof..but printed as fact..


  3. proof is in the pudding
    let see how long to this get out

  4. proof is in the pudding

  5. toe to toe with the ruskies!

  6. They’re passing out tinfoil hats to all 12 attendees at Clinton rallies now…
    Long before somebody at the DNC came up with the “Russia is sabotaging Hilly’s campaign!” conspiracy fable, Assange had already stated publicly the hacks came from inside the DNC, which is pretty much par for the course, as most hacks are inside jobs.
    The emails are damning, if you’ve bothered to read them, such as the one that clearly shows Hillary conspired with the DNC in the primaries to commit election fraud & cheat Bernie out of the primary win…and don’t tell me you weren’t a bit confused that Bernie wasn’t doing much better against her, we were all scratching our heads over it. Now you know why.
    Currently, the Hildapress is pulling out all the stops to try and smear Trump & make this race sound closer than it really is, and if you want to see the different levels of public support between Trump and Clinton, all you need do is count the heads at their respective rallies. Trump easily fills entire sports arenas & stadiums, Clinton has trouble filling a high school auditorium past 25%.
    Trump is on the right side of all the issues, which is why the Hildapress ignores the issues and sticks to unproven allegations of scandal, and only against Trump, while defending Hillary by trying to cast doubt on all the proof of her treason & wrongdoing.
    Powerful corporate & banking cartels are sweating at the thought Trump might be in a position to expose their past shenanigans, they don’t know what he might do when he takes office. They’d much rather have a “member of the club” maintained in that position, and it is just 6 multinational corporations that control 90% of the U.S. media.
    Pretty clear what’s been going on.

  7. Reblogged this on World Peace Forum.

  8. the last post is reply to Scortch Deart thx
    the one bfore is reply to XXX with b-girl haha
    for the One’s the stand for something b/c no-vote= Trump OPPONENT vote or HELL ARY that what bring
    for the PLP that care we need paper-trail like Brexit or take a pic of the ballot & load in a Trump secure site
    vid at the end
    btw listen Trump speeches He talks like us like we the people or deplorables or precariat or the new-sons of liberty or what ever word of jour THEY-ELITES call tday
    remember no-Vote is a vote for
    from His speech
    ” Trump OPPONENT friends at Goldman Sachs are also working to take down Donald Trump. This is in addition to Clinton’s associates at the UN, World Bank, and other globalist organizations. The establishment hates Donald Trump! That is why the RNC has joined forces with the cabal to attack Donald Trump!

    Not a single cent from the RNC is being spent on the Presidential race. Paul Ryan and Reince Preibus want Donald Trump to lose. In fact, the RNC is even working with the liberal media to promote defamatory stories about Donald Trump. It is sickening! ”
    here vid again

  9. meanwhile ww3 has just been declared

  10. “do yourself a favour and read the article..we are witnessing the most coordinated media collusion ever seen involving a US election..and i am not a trump supporter..far from it..but i can see with an unbiased eye and its criminal..and global..and controlled..”

    Political and Cultural Engineering

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: