Albright: I’m “ready to register as Muslim”..after her government killed millions of them!

aamfhce

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/albright-im-ready-to-register-as-muslim/ar-AAmf8Wv?OCID=ansmsnnews11

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said Wednesday she is prepared to “register as Muslim” in solidarity amid reports that President Trump plans to take executive action affecting immigrants to the U.S.

“I was raised Catholic, became Episcopalian & found out later my family was Jewish. I stand ready to register as Muslim in #solidarity,” Albright tweeted.

Albright’s tweet echoes the sentiment of feminist icon Gloria Steinem, who said Saturday she, too, would register as a Muslim if such a registry were required.

“If you force Muslims to register, we will all register as Muslims,” Steinem said during a speech at the Women’s March on Washington, drawing raucous cheers.

Trump during his presidential campaign called for a temporary ban on Muslims coming into the U.S. and said he would “absolutely” require Muslims in the U.S. to register in a database.

Albright’s tweets came amid reports this week that Trump was expected to sign executive orders including a temporary ban on most refugees and suspending visas for foreign nationals from seven countries.

The Associated Press reported Wednesday that a draft order shows Trump plans to suspend for 30 days issuing visas to citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries and stop accepting Syrian refugees into the country.

Those moves come amid a series of executive actions Trump has taken in the first few days of his presidency, including orders Wednesday to build a border wall along the border with Mexico and enforce immigration laws.

———-

horrific irony from a very evil (((lady)))..

madeleine-albright2

she admits she will lie to her own government..but its much more than that..watch the video..and then try to work out what this hypocritical globalist is really agitating for..

(((gloria steinem))) also gets a mention..

401

Advertisements

~ by seeker401 on January 30, 2017.

37 Responses to “Albright: I’m “ready to register as Muslim”..after her government killed millions of them!”

  1. One of the things Madeleine and Hillary and the rest of the globalists don’t want people to know is, Trump’s Immigration Ban is basically tied into the Tech H1 B Visas. This is a good thing for AMERICAN tech workers, provided they don’t use their ‘legalese’ to fool the people again.

    Trump’s plan and Legislation presented by Sen. Grassley and Durbin….

    Only the brightest and best of foreign tech workers who graduate from U.S. schools will be given priority for the visas with employers who seek to hire H-1B workers.

    The legislation “explicitly prohibits” the replacement of American workers by visa holders.”

    The bill requires “all employers who seek to hire H-1B visa holders to first make a good-faith effort to recruit American workers.” This is something Grassley and Durbin have long sought in prior bills, but faced opposition from industry.

    (GOOD FAITH in my humble opinion, is the LOOPHOLE! They can ‘claim’ anything they like, ‘in good faith’, and it doesn’t make it factual in the end, just as they claim Americans don’t seem to be qualified for any kind of job in recent years because American workers expect to be paid a decent wage considering the billions and billions of dollars the corporations are making in profits while receiving many benefits from the taxpayers.)

    IT services firms that use H-1B workers to offshore work will face new restrictions. The bill prohibits a firm with “more than 50 employees, of which at least half are H-1B or L-1 holders, from hiring additional H-1B employees.”

    The bill APPEARS to raise the wages of L-1 workers, and includes new enforcement and audits. The L-1 is used for intra-company transfers.

    “For years, foreign outsourcing companies have used loopholes in the laws to displace qualified American workers and facilitate the outsourcing of American jobs,” said Durbin. “The H-1B and L-1 Visa Reform Act would end these abuses and protect American and foreign workers from exploitation.”

    http://www.computerworld.com/article/3159596/it-careers/new-senate-bill-seeks-sweeping-h-1b-changes.html#tk.drr_mlt

    http://www.computerworld.com/article/3161862/it-careers/trump-eyes-an-h-1b-visa-aimed-at-best-and-brightest.html

    http://www.computerworld.com/article/3162707/it-industry/trump-immigration-ban-means-a-war-with-tech.html

    • On second thought……. if Silicon Valley is not objecting…this must be another magic ‘trick’ by the shadow government corporations in D.C. so I guess we should just keep ‘following the money’ 🙂

      SILICON VALLEY IS LETTING TRUMP GET AWAY WITH IT

      snip

      “The likes of Apple, Microsoft, and Facebook have (like any large corporation) refused to oppose head-on Trump’s widely outrageous, often-illegal agenda. But unlike most other large corporations, Silicon Valley has long draped itself in language of principle, to Make the world a better place — Facebook’s mission statement remains the effort to “make the world more open and connected,” and one can almost remember a time when Google was proudly associated with the phrase “don’t be evil.”

      Immediately after Trump seized Election Day, CEOs yearning for a friendly tax repatriation policy lined up to wish him the best, tentatively supporting the new president in tones of Well, let’s just wait and see, while some offered their services to the man directly. Oracle CEO Safra Catz, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick, and SpaceX/Tesla CEO Elon Musk all have formal advisory positions with the Trump administration.

      In a long Facebook post, Mark Zuckerberg said, “I’m concerned about the impact of the recent executive orders signed by President Trump,” while adding, “That said, I was glad to hear President Trump say he’s going to ‘work something out’ for Dreamers,” and “I’m also glad the President believes our country should continue to benefit from ‘people of great talent coming into the country.’” Zuckerberg concluded, “I hope we find the courage and compassion to bring people together and make this world a better place for everyone.” This is a statement inoffensive to the point of meaninglessness. A Facebook spokesperson later added, “We are assessing the impact on our workforce and determining how best to protect our people and their families from any adverse effects.” The fact that PayPal founder and Trump adviser Peter Thiel sits on Facebook’s board was not addressed.”

      https://theintercept.com/2017/01/29/silicon-valley-is-letting-trump-get-away-with-it/

    • for (((Albright))) et. al.
      read my post, (pardon my English)
      https://direktdemokratihalmstad.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/judaism-has-declared-war-on-humanity-proof/

  2. “I was raised Catholic, became Episcopalian & found out later my family was Jewish.”
    I stand ready to register as Muslim in #solidarity,” Albright tweeted.”

    Nice example of the web she weaves as she practices to deceive. First crypto-jewess, now a pseudo/crypto-Muslim? Enciting others to impersonate another person at the risk of great injury to say the least.

    • Albright’s way of thinking is what I am sure others will find familiar. Monism, which undergirds the syncretistic Ecumenical Movement.

      Put as many talisman in ones own idol room, and it appears to the practitioner to make their way more powerful, in other words, give them more luck or charm.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monism
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talisman

      • Adirondack, thank you…I am unfamiliar with Monism and will study the links.

        • This is a more popular way to understand the syncretistic, ecumenical movement. You do know SMC, just not by its philosophic name, i.e. Monism.

          androgyny
          or
          androgynous Baphomet

          “Androgyny is the combination of masculine and feminine characteristics. Gender ambiguity may be found in fashion, gender identity, sexual identity, or sexual lifestyle. It can also refer to one’s singing or speaking voice.[
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androgyny

          • you note that baphomet when pictured has breasts and is in fact transgender as this image seems to show..and that is correct..

          • all distinctions and diversification gone. literally ‘all are one’

            Albright is a Catholic-Episcopalian-Jewish-Muslim androgyny.

            Like if a pig and human were somehow made into one being. 🙂

            https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/scientists-create-first-human-pig-embryos/

            or some people who literally desire to be a Cat-Man

            androgyny: male-female in one being

          • Thanks Adirondack for the clarification and pointing me in the right direction as I steady me legs under me. I had a fair understanding of each piece of the puzzle, it’s when the pieces begin to emerge as “One” aka mono which is the clear goal, I must admit i still get a bit wobbly.

            This baphomat is so multi featured. This androgenice factor must be a perversion not only on the earthly inhabitants that reproduce but in heaven where the scriptures say there is no male or female.

            https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/tag/baphomet/

            S

            • Your post is spot-on, except I am not sure about something you said which I go over below. The goal to emerge as “One” – great way of putting it. Androgyny is a perversion.

              The only places in Scripture I know referring to anything about ‘no male and female’ is in (1) Galatians, and (2) when Christ teaches people will not marry or be given into marriage in heaven, Matthew 22:30. Galatians is about how males and females are equally in Christ. The not given into marriage, like angels, I know not of other Scripture that by ‘analogy of faith’ or ‘good and necessary consequence’ to know what the Matthew passage further means. I really do not know at this time what the Matthew passage means, other than it stopped the mouths of the Sadducees, who did not believe in a resurrection of the body and soul (person), tried to trick Jesus.

              Maybe you could refer me to where in Scripture you are signifying concerning ‘no male or female in heaven’.

              Thanks

              • Okay, give me a few minutes Adirondack to study the Word and see why I was so nonchalant and matter of fact. Much of what I have believed thus far has been shaken 🙂

              • Philippians 3:20-21 says “For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body that it may be conformed to His glorious body, according to the working by which He is able even to subdue all things to Himself.”So if you think you’re in the wrong body, this is the answer for you: There is no gender in heaven. In heaven you will not have this confusion and frustration. You will no longer be deceived. Our lowly bodies will be transformed and conformed to His glorious body.

                • I do not read in Philippians the word “gender” in association with body.

                  I believe the body in these verses is the same body referred to in 1 Cor. 15. This glorious body is our glorification as Scripted in Romans 8:30, Romans 6:1-11, Ephesians 2:1-10, and Colossians 3:4. Our earthly body is being renewed into the image of God, that was corrupted by sin at the Fall. Our body is sown perishable and raised an imperishable body (1 Cor. 15:42) at the union of our body and soul upon Christ’s return, if we die before then.

                  I read, the glorification refers to the time when Christ returns and there will be no more sin and death. Scripture reveals our being renewed starts at our regeneration. The life long renewal in Scripture is referred to as sanctification (1 Thessalonians 5:23; 2 Thess. 2:13). A renewal from the old self to a putting on of a new self (Colossians 3 & Ephesians 4:22-24). Sanctification is completed at our glorification. There is an ordo salutis or order of salvation (see Romans 8:29-30).

                  There are other places in Scripture that give definition to the words ‘glorious body’ that refers to this order of salvation that God works in man. I do not read a reference to the body undergoing a change in gender. The only change referred to is a ‘renewal’, or ‘conformity’ to the image of God, as in the case pertaining to the latter Romans 8:29, “For those… to become conformed to the image of His Son…” (also the Philippians verse you reference says “conformity”). Where the word “conformity” is used in other places of Scripture, then a further definition of the term may be understood, i.e. analogy of faith, and good and necessary consequence.

                  If you could demonstrate the detail of gender in Philippians or somewhere else in Scripture that I missed, then I will gladly acknowledge that I may be mistaken.

                  A Short Digression: The image of God is created in man, male and female He created (Genesis 1:27). Without digressing too much onto another topic, our image is like God, but at the same time, God is fully He, as first revealed in Genesis 1:5. The distinction between Creator/creator means we are like God in certain ways, but there is no analogy, only revelation to demonstrate the similarities and differences. E.g. God loves. We love. Yet God’s love is infinitely greater and different than man’s love, and yet, God out of His lovingkindness and goodness gave man the gift to love.

                  What is the image and likeness of God? Colossians 3:10 and Ephesians 4:24 reveal. A good contrasting verse of the image of God, is the image of Adam, due to the corrupt image at the Fall, (Genesis 5:1-3).

                  • Okay doky artichokey I’m a working on it. I actually hit send prematurely, didn’t think I would sneak under your Berean radar, lol.

                    • Berean radar – lol! You are graceful, thanks.

                      As you may well know, but I want to make the following clear not just for you or me, but anybody. What we are discussing is not necessarily about justification, but has to do with sanctification. These are theological terms concerning the order of salvation revealed in Scripture.

      • Here is a good example of a talisman (starts at ca. 33 second mark to ca. 1:15):

        I think Albright is using the muslim label as a talisman charm.
        https://www.britannica.com/topic/talisman-charm

        I do not necessarily think Albright is consciously using the charm in an occult way, though that may well be the case (notice the up close of the snake). For Albright, the charm is definitely political. A way to charm muslims and others of like sympathy to gravitate toward her persuasion of solidarity as described in the article seeker posted.

        charm: (1) the power or quality of pleasing or delighting; appeal, (2) a quality that pleases or attracts; a delightful characteristic
        http://www.thefreedictionary.com/charm

        • trigger word?

          • Maybe… I do not know what ‘trigger word’ is. It does appear to be a current political trigger word that rallies groups of people together, if that is what you mean.

            Albright is identifying as a Muslim, though she is a Jew, and she is saying, ‘I was a Catholic, etc. so Catholics – I am like you.’ Like intrigued said below, “no allegiance to any country, nation, people or religion…only to themselves.”

            As a globalist, she may literally identify as anybody, because they have no allegiance to anybody. When groups of people gravitate toward a globalist agenda, then the group has “no allegiance to any country, nation, people or religion…” only the globalist.’ The group will be ambiguous, and androgynous. The group, like globalist, will have less identifiable, and distinct features, due to their possessing in their mind an allegiance to nobody and everything.

            Whatever charm they may need for the time, like in the movie clip above, in order to expand their globalist self-interest and preserve themselves, they will use. Currently with Albright, she is chanting Muslim to charm Muslims and charm others who identify in this androgynous manner, i.e. ambiguous allegiance to nothing and everything.

    • i call that fraud..but meh..

      • exactly! It is fraud.

      • I agree with you both. It is flat out fraud and everyone she involves become co conspirators in conspiring to defraud even if ultimately they don’t do it, she is conspiring to defraud.
        Complaint filed with DOJ would get attention. To file an action in federal court the plaintiff must have standing. The fact that the fallout endangers all inhabitants.

        I thought.

    • GLOBALIST That’s what Albright is….no allegiance to any country, nation, people or religion…only to themselves. “It’s a big club, and we ain’t in it”, according to Carlin. 🙂

  3. out of topic or not https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FTFB9GDfls

  4. out of topic or not
    look who isInvesting inQuebec
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/investment-ideas/quebec-based-exfos-stock-jumps-after-soros-boosts-stake/article33471932/
    http://business.financialpost.com/investing/quebec-citys-exfo-inc-gets-share-boost-after-catching-the-eye-of-billionaire-george-soros
    we post this bfore or not is interesting
    https://www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/375561-hungary-soros-eu-refugees/

  5. HA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-Vbx7GGkCo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: