MASONIC HANDSHAKES IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE

http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/k1002.cfm

We shall show you unbelievable instances in the original King James Bible where Masonic Handshakes are liberally sprinkled throughout the first section, in the Genealogies.

Listen to the purpose of a Masonic Handshake to the Masons who use them so often.

“The secret hand signs of the Illuminati are thought to work magic, to evoke supernatural beings, and of course, to communicate messages … The handshake, or grip, is a sign of unity, oneness of purpose and allegiance or devotion to a joint cause. It is considered a bond or seal of acknowledgment between Illuminist brethren. The Masonic authorities speak of a ‘mystic tie’ or spiritual union. Certainly, demon powers do congregate together and enjoy one another’s foul company.” (Texe Marrs, Codex Magica, p. 145)

Did you catch the pertinent information in this definition? Masonic handshakes accomplish the following:

* “evoke supernatural beings”

* ” work magic”

* “sign of unity”

At the very end, Marrs reports that Masonic handshakes are demonic.

A former Satanist told me that all witches place great stock in symbols. They believe that, once a symbol is created, it begins to throb with occult energy from the demonic realm. Symbols literally are believed to be transfer points of great supernatural energy. It makes no difference whether the symbol is on the ground or the floor of a building — as it in with all rituals — or in a painting, or on a piece of paper. Once they are created, they begin to throb with enormous demonic power.

Thus, it is of great significance that all these Satanic symbols were originally placed on the original 1611 KJV Bible. The Rosicrucians who created these symbols really and truly believed that they were creating “centers of occult power” which would throb with demonic power 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. I believe that Bacon and King James firmly intended to create a Rosicrucian Bible, filled with occult symbols which were “throbbing with Satanic power”, designed to move the entire English-speaking peoples of the world into the “Mystic Christianity” called Rosicrucianism.

And, of course, Pilgrim and Puritan leaders of the day knew this belief, because they were “aware of Satan’s devices”; within seconds, these genuine Christian leaders would have recognized these symbols, knew of the importance placed on them by Satanists and were able to quickly reject the original 1611 King James Version of the Bible as a “wicked …. Bible from that wicked King!”

As Matthew 1 proves, the Jewish Messiah must prove his lineage back to King David. This genealogy shows the genealogy leading up to King David!

Since King David is so very important to the Cabbalist Rosicrucian, these occultists would naturally claim that a great many links in his Family Tree would be Masonic. Look at all the Masonic handshakes! Notice that Solomon is depicted here as a Freemason, one of the most cherished of all Masonic teachings. From King Solomon, Masonry has spun off the myth of the Masonic Messiah-type figure, Hiram Abiff.

We have provided many more examples below. Click “View” by each title to view the image in a new window.

“Masonic Handshake — Abraham Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Aminadab Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Benjamin Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Bilhah Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Canaan Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Chelub Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Ephraim Genealogy” – View 1st View 2nd

“Masonic Handshake — HamGen Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Hezron Genealogy”
“Hezron Top – View , Hezron Middle – View , Hezron Middle 2 – View , and Hezron Lower – View

“Masonic Handshake — Iehiel Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Jacob Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Judah Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Kohath Genealogy” – View View More

“Masonic Handshake — Lion of Judah Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Lot Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Manassah Genealogy” – View

“Unkown Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Salathiel Genealogy” – View

“Masonic Handshake — Terah Genealogy” – View

As you continue to understand, these pagan Rosicrucians and Freemasons led by Sir Francis Bacon had their hands all over the original 1611 King James Bible. They took perfectly good text and added page after page after page of Rosicrucian artwork, some of which tells a hidden story, while others are just symbols. These Masonic handshakes are very real and very telling, for they tell the story that Bacon and King James conspired to produce a Rosicrucian masterpiece when they published this Bible.

Likely, Bacon, James, and the Knights of the Helmet intended that this KJV would be the perfect compliment to the Shakespearean plays in popularizing the new Elizabethan English with the common people. In the opinion of one Masonic author, Bacon and the Knights of the Helmet considered how to popularize this new English amongst the people and concluded that two different tools were required:

1) Arts and Entertainment — Hence the Shakespearean plays;

2) The “People’s Holy Book” — hence the King James Version of the Bible

However, Bacon and King James were in for a rude shock, as their new Bible was soundly rejected by the religious leaders of the day. Both Pilgrim and Puritan leaders immediately rejected the KJV, based upon the Satanic symbolism they instantly recognized. Even Anglican pastors — who are supposed to take orders from Headquarters without murmur, complaint, or resistance — rebelled, refusing to take out their beloved Geneva Bibles and put in the new King James Bibles, filled with all these Satanic symbols.

In about 1650, another printing run was undertaken, and this time, all these Satanic symbols were taken out. All coding was likewise removed. At this point, the KJV was fine — it was the Bible we know and love and trust today. Gradually, over the next 100 years, the natural superiority and beauty of Elizabethan English took over and gradually forced the Geneva Bible into obscurity.

———-

thanks to rev17 for the link..

wow..this is really worth a read..

“As you continue to understand, these pagan Rosicrucians and Freemasons led by Sir Francis Bacon had their hands all over the original 1611 King James Bible. They took perfectly good text and added page after page after page of Rosicrucian artwork, some of which tells a hidden story, while others are just symbols. These Masonic handshakes are very real and very telling, for they tell the story that Bacon and King James conspired to produce a Rosicrucian masterpiece when they published this Bible.”

401

Advertisements

~ by seeker401 on May 12, 2017.

60 Responses to “MASONIC HANDSHAKES IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE”

  1. Reblogged this on Anthony Jerdine.

  2. CHRISTIAN ROSENCREUZ

    http://watch-unto-prayer.org/shock-awe-20.pdf

  3. Do you remember the book about Sir Francis – real Shakespeare I sent you one day Seek? It is all there 🙂

  4. Reblogged this on World Peace Forum.

  5. Bacon was the translator too
    was & other Bacon bfre He was more interesting the author of Mirabilis
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Bacon
    talking about interesting we don’t use to like JhonH but he is thinking peace solutions so welcome to the club ( saddly small club 😦

  6. […] Source: MASONIC HANDSHAKES IN THE KING JAMES BIBLE […]

  7. incase you guys missed yday

    btw we hope is going to read the riot-act to THEY-SAUDIS maybe treat-with nine-elleven-lawsuits
    btw http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2017/05/11/saudis-paid-for-veteran-trips-to-counter-lawsuit?via=desktop&source=copyurl

  8. The New Atlantis – Secret Mysteries of America’s Beginnings

    The greatest “Whodunit” of the past 500 years! Secret Mysteries takes the mystery out of America’s history. This video unfolds the fascinating history behind the founding of America, and exposes the esoteric underbelly of its design. Why is Washington D.C. build on the 77th Meridian? Are the Revolutionary War cities really built in perfect alignment with Stonehenge? If America was founded as a Christian nation, why are many of its symbols, buildings, and monuments based on Pagan traditions? There is no doubt that much of America’s national heritage was Christian, but just as a coin has two sides, our national heritage has a second side — one based squarely on occult secret societies and their values.

    To find the answer to these questions, we follow the journey of secret societies from England to the New World and learn of their ancient hope: to rebuild the lost empire of Atlantis.

    In the 16th century, Sir Francis Bacon was at the helm of the secret societies in England. When Bacon penned his classic work, ‘The New Atlantis’ he believed that America and Atlantis were one and the same. He outlined his vision for the perfect society, and some suggest the program he set forth has been the driving force behind the course of modern history. While he did not originate the concept, it was Bacon who articulated an ancient plan to be carried out by all the secret orders. As Chief of the Rosicrucians and the first Grand Master of modern Freemasonry, Bacon sent his followers to the new world. A 1910 Newfoundland stamp with his image upon it reads, ‘Lord Bacon: the Guiding Spirit in [the] Colonization Scheme.’ Because of his influence, Francis Bacon is considered by some to be ‘the real and true founder of America.’ For centuries, controversy has surrounded this figure who is said to be the illegitimate son of Queen Elizabeth I, and secret author of the Shakespeare plays; the man whom Thomas Jefferson considered one of the three most influential men in history.

    Is it possible that Bacon’s vision guides America today?

    Where The DaVinci Code meets National Treasure: Learn the incredible secrets of the esoteric traditions, hidden within the manifold layers of signs and symbols in our nation’s infrastructure. Find out why some believe that from ancient times America has been chosen to fulfill a secret destiny.

    Cutting Edge has been working on this video for many years, as we are determined that this second coin side of our National Heritage be fully understood. Only when you properly understand our past can you understand where our leaders are taking us today. Only when you properly understand the occult heritage which our Founding Fathers set in place can you understand why America is in Iraq, why we are forcing a strange brand of “democracy” upon the world, and why America has always been in the leadership of the nations of the world in marching steadily towards the NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM (New Order of the Ages – New World Order), the symbol of which is on the back of the American One Dollar Bill. We have enlisted the aid of a Christian Hollywood film producer (yes, there is one), and a proven Hollywood promoter. The quality of the script writing is superb and the technical quality of the film is superior to “The History Channel” or “The National Geographic”.

  9. Although we are familiar with Bacon’s connection to the Founding of America, we may be surprised that he had a ‘hand’ in the publishing of the 1611 KJV introducing occult symbolism .. but where did he attain this occult knowledge ?? .. and why would such an effort be made to corrupt the Bible ?? .. Cui Bono ??

    It has been claimed that Freemasonry is very ancient and goes back variously to the fifteenth-century BC Egypt of Thutmose III, to the tenth-century BC Israel of the wise ruler Solomon and, more recently, to the medieval stonemasons and cathedral builders in York in 926 and Cologne in the twelfth century.

    Be that as it may, it is often held that English Freemasonry was founded by Francis Bacon who, in 1579, when he was 18, saw the need for studies to be secret among ‘sworn brothers-in-arms’. It is hard to believe that the 18-year-old Bacon just made Freemasonry up without being influenced by any preceding model. Manly Hall claims that he was initiated into a secret society in Navarre in France.

    His brother Anthony ran an intelligence service for the Earl of Essex there and was friendly with (to the extent of borrowing money from) the Protestant King of Navarre, the future Henri IV, King of France. From 1576 to 1579 (from the ages of 15 to 18), Bacon lived in Paris with Sir Amias Paulet, the English ambassador to France, and acquired knowledge of the French court. At that time the French court moved about the country. One of its hosts was Navarre, a kingdom in northern Spain near the Pyrenees, which was part French and part Spanish. It had been under Muslim rule from 711 to 798 and had been Spanish until 1234. In 1512 it was divided, with the Spanish portion being annexed by the Castilian Crown.

    Over the course of the sixteenth century the French part had become Protestant. Henri’s Navarre therefore had large Muslim and Jewish populations and strong Spanish and French influence. Hall says: ‘While serving his diplomatic apprenticeship at the court of Navarre, Bacon had been initiated into the new liberalism represented throughout Europe by Secret Societies of intellectuals dedicated to civil and religious freedom. He returned to England fully aware of the intentions of Philip II, the Spanish king.’1 Hall suggests that the secret society into which Bacon was initiated was anti-Spanish and of an intelligence-gathering nature. Given Navarre’s position as a Protestant country on the border of England’s greatest Catholic enemy, Spain, intelligence-gathering was undoubtedly a major activity at court. But it is likely that, at an impressionable age, Bacon was put in touch with a group whose symbolism was reflected in early English Freemasonry in 1579. This may have been a Pyrenean group of Cathar exiles who had fled from Montségur, southwest France, when the Cathars had been suppressed in 1244, or, more probably, a group of refugee Templars who had fled France in 1312 and had reacted to the burning of their leader Jacques de Molay in 1314 by forming a secret society across the border.
    Jewish Kabbalist exiles had also brought Jewish mysteries from the Middle East and Muslim Jerusalem, including the Temple of Solomon, to Languedoc. It is possible that Bacon learned about the Temple of Solomon from some of these. It must also be remembered that Septimania, the last region in Gaul to be held by the Spanish Visigoths, whose capital was Narbonne, was in Islamic hands from 720 to 759 and was Jewish-ruled from 768 to 812. It had been a magnet for Diaspora Jews settling in Languedoc and it had become the cradle of the Jewish Golden Age in France and Spain from the ninth to the thirteenth centuries. (It is worth remembering that the Grail legend surfaced in nearby Toledo, Spain, in the twelfth century.) It contained many Kabbalistic-Manichaean schools from which, the authors of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail state, the Cathars arose (rather than from the Bulgarian Bogomils). In short, it is possible that Bacon was in touch with secret Jewish knowledge on the borders of Spain and France while still in his teens.

    Hagger, Nicholas. The Secret Founding of America: The Real Story of Freemasons, Puritans, and the Battle for the New World (Kindle Locations 1617-1618). Watkins Media. Kindle Edition.

    • “Although we are familiar with Bacon’s connection to the Founding of America, we may be surprised that he had a ‘hand’ in the publishing of the 1611 KJV introducing occult symbolism .”

      He had a ‘hand’ in …yep, try the HIDDEN HAND and if the glove fits….ask OJ.

  10. The Usual Suspects ..

    The Role of Kabbalah in the Founding of the United States of America

    The Origins of Different Types of Kabbalah

    Before one can recognize the Kabbalistic influences on the founding of America, one must first understand what Kabbalah truly is. Kabbalah is commonly referred to as Jewish mysticism, but this definition does not do Kabbalah justice.
    Kabbalah is the Hebrew term for “that which is received.” What “is received” is nothing less than the metaphysical and spiritual teachings practiced and handed down by the schools of the Biblical prophets…

    These teachings were passed down almost exclusively by word of mouth for twelve hundred years since the destruction of the holy Temple in Jerusalem in 68 C.E. After this time, the Kabbalists teach, permission was granted by Heaven to put many of the ancient teachings into writing. And that is when problems began.
    Since the public dissemination of Kabbalah in Jewish circles in medieval Spain, there has also been public dissemination of Kabbalah outside of these Jewish circles. Kabbalistic manuscripts of all kinds were copied by non-Jews, mostly Catholics, and translated into European languages and Latin. Today, the Vatican library houses one of the greatest collections of Kabbalistic texts in the entire world….

    Even with access to these manuscripts, Christian transcribers of Kabbalah, many times were not experts in Hebrew and, therefore, made many mistakes in their translations. Another problem that arose was the obvious Christian bias to reinterpret Kabbalah in the light of Christian doctrine.
    This led to the rise of another form of Kabbalah, one which today is spelled with a “C” i.e., Cabbala. This Christian school of Cabbala also incorporated many ideas, doctrines and teachings that were not of Jewish origins.
    Unfortunately, the adulteration of Kabbalah did not stop with its Christianization. The holy Kabbalah of Torah was subject to yet another twist and turn. Being that Kabbalah (or Cabbala) is a metaphysical science, its teachings were also adopted and integrated into the European schools of occult and magic. Thus there developed a Kabbalah (of the Jews), a Cabbalah (of the Christians) and the Qabbala (with a “Q”) used by practitioners of the occult….

    The Masons Many non-Jewish mystical groups arose in renaissance Europe. Many of these groups were political in nature. Many of them also claimed that they were Kabbalistic secret societies. As secret societies, these groups would use clandestine means to achieve whatever political agenda their spiritual beliefs led them to pursue…
    The historical origins of the Masons is shrouded in mystery. Masonic legend claims their origins go back to the Temple of King Solomon. While this cannot be confirmed or denied, one thing is certain: the Masons carry with them a large body of “C”abbalistic knowledge.
    No stranger to politics, the Masons have had a monumental influence upon the establishment of the United States of America. Thus there is an actual role that the Kabbalah has played in the founding of the United States….

    The Righteous Gentile Influence on the Masons Although Masonic mysticism definitely came out of Christian sources, it, nonetheless, must be asked just how “Christian” Freemasonry truly is. While a great deal of information is available on this topic to argue the point,there are two specific points that I, as a Jew, find most interesting.
    Point one is that all Masonic rituals and prayers never mention the name of Jesus Christ. This completely unheard of in any Christian order.

    In Jewish tradition these “righteous Gentiles” were called Noahides (benei Noah in Hebrew) because they chose to live in accordance to seven universal principles of spiritual law as given originally to Noah and his children. Later at Mt Sinai, G-d reiterated these seven laws to the children of Israel and commanded that they be observed by all mankind
    What we see is that the United States of America was founded upon these seven principles of universal spirituality…

    Kabbalah is something holy. I am honored that Masonry has chosen Kabbalistic symbolisms to represent some of the highest ideals for the best political government ever conceived of by man. I am disappointed that the Masons have not lived up to these ideals.
    G-d, indeed has made a covenant with the righteous Gentile. This was first established with the children of Noah. Seven universal principles were then ordained to be observed by all mankind. The Masons know this. They themselves declare these seven principles as their own. I applaud such a relationship.

    http://www.koshertorah.com/PDF/KabbalahMasonsandAmerica.pdf

  11. The secret amazing story of Jewish influence on the founding of American democracy.

    Jewish Symbolism in America

    The Hebrew Bible also played a central role in the founding of various educational institutions including Harvard, Yale, William and Mary, Rutgers, Princeton, Brown, King’s College (later to be known as Columbia), Johns Hopkins, Dartmouth etc. In virtually all of these colleges, Bible studies were required and some even adopted some Hebrew word or phrase as part of their official emblem or seal. Beneath the banner containing the Latin Lux et Veritas, the Yale seal shows an open book with the Hebrew Urim V’Timum, a part of the breastplate of the High Priest in the days of the Temple. The Columbia seal has the Hebrew name for God at the top center, with the Hebrew name for one of the angels on a banner toward the middle. Dartmouth uses the Hebrew words meaning “God Almighty” in a triangle in the upper center of its seal.

    So popular was the Hebrew language in the late 17th and early 18th centuries that Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Brown, Princeton, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Pennsylvania taught courses in Hebrew – all the more remarkable because no university in England at the time offered such – and students had the option of delivering commencement speeches in Hebrew, Latin or Greek.

    Many of the Founding Fathers of America were products of these universities – for example, Thomas Jefferson attended William and Mary, James Madison – Princeton, Alexander Hamilton – King’s College. Thus, we can be sure that a majority of these political leaders were not only well acquainted with the contents of the Bible, but also had some working knowledge of Hebrew. Notes Abraham Katsch in The Biblical Heritage of American Democracy:

    At the time of the American Revolution, the interest in the knowledge of Hebrew was so widespread as to allow the circulation of the story that “certain members of Congress proposed that the use of English be formally prohibited in the United States, and Hebrew substituted for it.”

    http://www.jewishpathways.com/files/Jews_and_the_Founding_of_America.pdf

    • “all the more remarkable because no university in England at the time offered such – and students had the option of delivering commencement speeches in Hebrew, Latin or Greek.”

      England and Europe were always ahead in possessing the proto-‘s that eventually culminated in German Liberal Theology. It is why in America somebody like Pastor Jonathan Edwards could be considered a Puritan, when in England, Puritan’s had in the main disappeared by his time. America was last in receiving the Polish and German heresies that sprung up and spread west. Yet eventually Harvard, Yale, fell to Unitarianism, and then Princeton Seminary, itself one of the last orthodox seminaries of the Mainline churches, completely fell to German Liberal Theology by the early twentieth century and the outward sign that the door pretty much shut in the Mainline institutions to the gospel of Christ was the Confession of 1967. None of this has any bearing on the impact of secret societies in the founding of the U.S., which undoubtedly happened, or that the U.S. was not a Christian nation at its’ founding, again it was not a Christian nation at its’ founding. Yet, it is not that remarkable in my opinion that Hebrew language remained in academic institutions in the U.S. It is a trademark of the Reformation that the Greek and Hebrew languages were encouraged once again. The renaissance “back to the sources” was used in the Reformation. The confessional institutions held out the longest, which again subscription to confessions in churches, held out long in America, longer than in Europe. It was in England especially that subscription to confessions (orthodox expressions of church beliefs) disappeared very early, conflicts arose in the mid- to late seventeen century, which pulled England’s churches away from confessional obligations very quickly. It became very pragmatic early. America, much later, but in the government of the U.S. very early. In America, I think it was more the common population, the everyday church member, who held to Scriptural authority for a long time. It was more a top-down erosion of values from the beginning in the U.S. Starting with a U.S. government which would not recognize Christ is King of kings, which demonstrated the U.S. governments shady game to appear Christian, but in practice, was many other things – but Christian.

      One of the first treaty of the U.S., an act by Congress, the Treaty of Tripoli 1796:

      “As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”
      http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bar1796t.asp

      • From a 1832 article:

        “The President [Andrew Jackson] decided, that though he believed in the efficacy of prayer, yet as the Constitution of the United States did not acknowledge any God, and as his presidential powers were time-led by that instrument, he could not call on the nation to fast. He said it belonged to the states to appoint fast days. However true his view of the constitution may be, we must deeply regret that the President of the United States, refuses on any ground, to do what the heathen king of Nineveh did with divine approbation.

        Governor Throop has declared that General Jackson is wrong, and that it does not belong to the governor of the State of New York to appoint a fast day, as that would “unite Church and State.” The corporations of New York and Albany have followed suit, and have formally refused to do what the king of Nineveh did, as they say it would “unite Church and State!”

        Of interest to me, was the acknowledgement by the President, even in the early 1830’s, and the Governor of New York, the U.S. is not Christian. As the Treaty of Tripoli, above in my comment, also attests to.

        http://www.rparchives.org/data/Albany_Quarterly_Vol.1_5.pdf

        • Church and State are united .. under the banner of deception

          • Theologically, based on Scripture and acknowledge since the early church; so therefore, to this day, there is a distinction called the visible and invisible church. The church means believers. The church is a personal term, which means the people who worship God. The distinction of visible and invisible is necessary.

            The visible church are believers visibly seen by man due to visible marks instituted by God, only found in Scripture. The covenant signs and seals, i.e. baptism and Lord’s Supper, the preached Word, and church discipline. Each administered by ordained elders who are voted into their office by the members of the church. These visible marks of the true church are present so people may see what a visible church looks like, and are for the encouragement of His people so we may be assured by visible means according to His promise of deliverance in Christ. These visible covenant signs and seals are the visible gospel always accompanied by the preached gospel.

            Why an invisible church? There are believers and unbelievers in the visible church, some churches possess more light than others, and some churches are only synagogues of Satan.

            Only God knows the hearts of men and He sees the invisible saving graces, e.g. faith, in man, which God had given to them. Man can not see faith with physical eyes. God instituted a way for men to know if another is a believer; but man is fallible. (a) The covenant signs and seals are instituted by God for the church to practically demonstrate who His people are. (b) Man also professes the gospel by his mouth; thereby confesses his sin and need of a Savior. When ordained elders hear a man profess, then the elders are to treat him as a believer. He is to be considered part of God’s church.

            Man is fallible. Unbelievers and believers are in the church. Some churches possess more light than others; some none at all. The invisible church are believers from throughout time in different geographical locations. Only God infallibly knows the invisible church. It is called the invisible church, because, for one, faith is invisible, but exists. The invisible church is in the visible church, because believers gather visibly, seen by each other, in space and time (a visible location on earth), in order to worship God as He instituted the church to worship Him.

            There is a deception of people who profess, or do not even profess to be Christians, but they are not. They label their church buildings and share false teachings; yet, they do not know and live the gospel life worked by God. They are interested in earthly ways, in such a way believers are not. They are carnal and hate God and His ways. Some especially, covet the powers of the state to wield it for their ends. There is only evil in their hearts. This deception between the false church and the state, who is wooed by her harlotry, are of the present evil world. Some call the U.S. a Christian nation. Some leaders, and I think all Presidents, have professed to be Christian. Maybe some were, I do not know their hearts, but the U.S. is not a Christian nation. It’s legal document and laws never acknowledged Christ as King. So as much as some people may like to think or find some evidence to demonstrate the U.S. government is Christian – there is no evidence and it has not been acknowledged to be one historically. Of course there are Christians in the U.S., just as many other nations in the world, but the U.S. government legally does not acknowledge itself to be Christian. So yes, there is a banner of deception.

            God’s justice is being glorified and His loves endures forever as the new heaven and earth will be completed at the last day, and Christ will return and at that time not due to sin, but for a final judgment.

            • The Word “Church”
              The word church is not in the original Bible. The word church comes from the old English and Germanic word kirke, (pronounced “keer – kay”), and which itself came from Babylonian for the goddess Circe (pronounced “seer-say”). This is the word from which we get circle, circumference, circumstance, circumvent, etc. The goddess Circe was thought to be connected with the power of the sun, which is round, and thus the connection to Circe, a circle. In Anglo-Saxon history, the pagans worshipped the sun standing in a kirke, a circle. These pagan worshippers became known as the circle, or the kirke, then ultimately the church. Yes, pagans were called the church before Christians were called the church. Therefore, church means, at the least, a pagan circle for worship, and at the worst, the worship of the goddess Circe, or the worship of the sun.
              It was a direct willful act of English translators in the 1500’s to translate the Greek word ekklesia as church. They did this, most probably, because the pagans who accepted some form of Christianity retained the word church from their pagan circle to refer to their Christian meeting. They called ekklesia church in order to keep a conceptual link between paganism and Christianity.

              http://www.graftedinfellowship.org/uploads/5/7/3/3/5733440/the_word_church.pdf

              From in depth study, we have come to believe that there was a conspiracy to suppress the true definition of ekklesia, replacing it with a new definition translated church. Though one can’t be quite sure when, it appears it was with the King James translation, in about 1611.
              In 325 AD, “The Church” joined the State under Constantine, and it was carried through the Reformation. The Reformers were all involved in civil government, such as John Calvin who set up the civil government in Geneva. The pope was the head of the Catholic Church and he was kicked out of England, and King Henry VIII took jurisdiction over the Church. And then when the King James version was done, it was very important for them to retain the word “church” because they had jurisdiction over it, so King James made fifteen specific edicts, as far as the translation goes, and one of those edicts (edict number three) stated that this bible was to retain the word “church” in the translation and it was not to be replaced with the word “congregation.” That was his specific edict. He has no jurisdiction over the congregation (people), but he does over the church (physical buildings). So you can see he never wanted the word “assembly” associated with the original meaning of the Old Testament which meant “congregation.” So he knew the correct translation, obviously, but he didn’t want it in there, that way they retain control over “the church.” (From Christ’s Ekklesia and the Church Compared, by Richard Anthony)

              http://www.godseverlastingcovenant.com/biblicalstudy/IschurchintheBible.pdf

            • Sun Goddess Circe

              The origin of the word “church” is from kuriakon or kyriakon in Greek, but it is known in Scotland as “kirk,” in Germany as “Kirche,” and in the Netherlands as “kerk.” It means a building (the house of Kurios, or house of the Lord), in which in 1 Corinthians 8:5 it says that there are many lords, in which the custom of the Pagans was the worship of Sun Gods and reverence of them as being Lords. So refering to the church as the house of the Lord, is not denoting what Lord, because the meaning never did, so the people today have no idea they referring to an idol god. The word Kirche is similar to the Hebrew word (kikkar) Rkk, meaning a disk or cicle thus meaning Sun Worship. The Sun was worshipped as Baal or Lord by a full circle of pagans, which is why pagans worshipped on the first day of the week, Sun-day, as those claiming to be christians are doing today unaware that they are actually pagans.
              Another origin of the word Church is found in the Anglo Saxon root word Circe, which stems from the Greek name of the goddess “Circe”, who was the daughter of the Sun God worshipped as “Christos Helios”, from whom the name Christ is derived from who was a Roman Sun god. The proper Hebrew word is Aqhal (Ihq) which means Assembly, Company, Congregation, called out as an organized body. So as you can see by the etymology of the word “Church”, it is clearly of Pagan origin, and has nothing to do with the Most High nor his people, but has everything to do with those who worship the Sun as god on Sun-day, in their Roman Pantheon known as a Church. See what most people in these religious institutions don’t know is that, Roman Emperor Constantine The Great in 321 AD, legislated Sun-day as a day of rest dedicated to the Greek and Roman Sun-god, Helios. Constantine worshipped “Christos Helios” which means “Christ-The-True-Sun.
              Church comes from the Anglo-Saxon root word “circe,” and stems from the Greek name of the goddess “Circe,” the daughter of “Helios,” the Roman Sun-god adopted from Greek mythology. So today, these people in these religious institutions throughout the world, have been deceived into worshipping Helios in his daughter’s name Church, and are really Pagans in every form shape and fashion. Most churches you see estaablished today, are State controlled 501-C (3) Corporations. A Church that is formed under the permission of the State and thereby accepts State offered benefits for doing so, is no longer under the “headship” of Messiah, but has instead placed it’s self under the sole authority of the State. A 501-C (3) Church or any Church formed by State permission under any “Corporate form” will no longer be permitted to discuss the affairs that may counter or oppose the rules or laws established by the State, for they are at the complete mercy of the State in all matters. This is why you will never see your TD Snakes, and Eddie Money Long, and Creflo Got Your Dollar or Create A Flow Dollar, Joel Oscheme, ever speak out agains’t the government, because they have signed their soul over to the State.
              Acts 5:29 states – Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men. So if the Most High as he has done with everyone of his servants the prophets, and his Son, move on them to prophesy against the nation and governments of the earth, these religious sold out State flunkies, have to disobey the Most High and obey man who pays their salary, or else be dealt with by the State and then Jewish Elite who controls the American government. The Son of Man and his disciples went to the people to teach, they didn’t have no church setup for the people to come and hear them to get knowledge, the Pharisees and the hypocrites had churches, aka temples and synagogues. The Son of Man and his disciples were in the streets were the sick and blind and lepers were, in the streets is where the word of the Most High is needed, not in some Pagan temple.

              http://www.macquirelatory.com/Church%20Untold%20Truth.htm

            • “the invisible church” .. a secret society

              • I understand this is an issue for you, and respect your opinion. For the sake of conscience, you must hold to your convictions, at least I do. I pray that God will give me humble fruit, because I know my pride is ugly and is despicable. Sin is nasty, and praise God for the day when it will be no more. We have been down this path before, so what I am going to say may not add to our discussion; so, I apologize.

                For me, God’s authoritative and infallible Word gives definition, not creaturely etymologies from pagan dictionaries. Etymology is helpful and adds much to our understanding of the world, if used correctly in my opinion, and yes, correctly is determined by my hermeneutic, which pertaining to my hermeneutic I have been open as to what it is.

                In philosophy, the etymological fallacy* possesses value in sharpening rational discourse, though not on its’ own. I do not necessarily need it, nor put any weight on it for what I have provided in order to persuade a more charitable understanding and witness as to what I really said in my comments. Instead, for me, letting Scripture define Scripture, i.e. analogy of faith, is sufficient and satisfactory enough for me.

                Scripture is full of different names for Christians, e.g. Nazarenes, the people of the Way, the Elect, believers, the body of Christ, those circumcised in the heart, etc. The church also, e.g. those who congregate or assemble, thus congregation and assembly; the body of Christ, worshippers of God (Yahweh, Jehovah, LORD, Christ, Jesus, GOD, LORD of hosts, Almighty God, etc.), members, house of God, living stones, believers, the people of God, etc.

                * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymological_fallacy

                Have a lovely day! LORD bless

    • At the time of the American Revolution, the interest in the knowledge of Hebrew was so widespread as to allow the circulation of the story that “certain members of Congress proposed that the use of English be formally prohibited in the United States, and Hebrew substituted for it.”

      • That is interesting, and I would not be surprised if demonstrated to have pre-existed before the fifteenth century. It comes from a misunderstanding in theology called “Inspiration”. Some people think the Hebrew language is God’s language, but historic theology has Scripturally differentiated between God’s Word and the human author in the following manner:

        a.) mechanical inspiration: one with no input from the human author. Divine voice with no mediation, e.g. “This is my beloved Son…” (Matthew 3:17).

        b.) organic inspiration: distinguishes the process from mechanical and recognizes human diversity as the means by which God inscripturated His Word.

        c.) plenary inspiration: that all parts of the Bible are divine. One cannot determine one part is human and another part divine.

        All three are correct, but add to the definition of Scriptural Inspiration. Even mechanical inspiration, is an organic inspiration (has a human author), because even Matthew 3:17 is claimed to be written by Matthew. Yet there is a technical difference between “a” and “b”, which “b” observes the obvious human author, and “c” observes the obvious human author inscripturated what is truly God’s Word, not the human author’s. In other words, the Word came from another Person called God, and He revealed His Word to man to write down.

        Another theological understanding is “accommodation”. God authoritatively used the means He had created, even in a Fallen world (which He is not the author of sin). At one time, God voluntarily condescended and accommodated to a people who spoke and wrote in Hebrew. God who is the Creator, who is vastly of a different kind than the creature (created), accommodated Himself to man, so that man would understand Him. God used means, in this case the Hebrew language, for His purpose. In terms of His written Word, a purpose of communicating in an understandable way to a people who understood, spoke, and wrote in Hebrew. God accommodated His own, eternal, and uncreated Word to a created people.

        One demonstration of the eternality of God’s Word is His Word had been given and written in the Bible in three languages: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Yet, in each of these human languages, it is God who had accommodated to man’s native, created language to reveal an understanding that has nothing to do with man’s understanding, including man’s own philosophy of language, science, art, etc. God revealed an understanding which comes from God Himself in a way that regenerate man, i.e. believing man, will understand who He is and His works of creation, providence, and redemption.

        I would not be surprised if those members of Congress thought it would be better for the official language of the U.S. to be Hebrew, and not English, based on an error and false notion of Scriptural Inspiration and Accommodation. That error being that God’s language is Hebrew. Other cases of the same error, would be His language is Aramaic and/or Greek. In pagan ideology, the error would be some other sacred language of the creature man, Pali, Latin, etc. God’s Word is wholly, immensely, and vastly of a different kind than man’s, and only God could accommodate Himself to such a finite creature.

        • thx Wildy 🙂 make lots of sense & answer other questions too 🙂

          • 2 Timothy 3:16-17, “16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.”

            The term used in my previous comment “inspiration” is derived from “inspired” in this Scripture of 2 Timothy. I do not know the whole Historical Theology of the Scripture term “inspiration” and all the various other Bible passages related to the doctrine of revelation concerning “inspiration”. What I do know is, the Greek word translated “inspiration” above is “theopneustos”. The Greek word is usually translated “inspiration”, but literally means “God-breathed”. In some English translations, the word “God-breathed” is used, e.g. NIV Bible translation.

            So, a main Scripture passage for understanding the theology of inspiration is 2 Timothy 3:16. What the passage is basically saying is, all of Scripture is God-breathed, or in other words, comes from God. Other ways to translate the word: Scripture is an expiration* from God, or an exhalation from God, or again, breathed out from God.

            Is Scripture literally “breathed-out”, as if God breathes? No. It is God accommodating Himself to man in such a way that man may glean some understanding about the infinite Word in some finite, little, creaturely way.

            *expiration: to exhale breath

            Thanks for the encouragement Isabel!

  12. End-of-Days Prophecy Describes Erdogan Leading Ishmael to Final War for Jerusalem

    This week, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan established himself as a leader in the End-of-Days by calling for the Islam to unite for Jerusalem. Erdogan’s perplexing statement could be the cry that rallies the world of Ishmael for the prophesied third and final battle of Jerusalem preceding the Messiah.
    On Monday, at the opening ceremony of the International Forum on Al-Quds Wakfs (Islamic trusts) in Istanbul, Erdogan called for hundreds of thousands of Muslims to ascend to the Temple Mount, thundering, “Each day that Jerusalem is under occupation is an insult to us.”
    Rabbi Berger, rabbi of the Tomb of King David on Mount Zion, believes that Erdogan’s call to Muslims was based in a Jewish prophecy that predates Islam.
    “Erdogan is fulfilling a prophecy as the leader of his country,” Rabbi Berger told Breaking Israel News. “Just like Pharaoh in Egypt.”
    The rabbi related a prophecy written in Pirkei D’Rebbe Eliezer, a collection of Biblical exegesis believed to have been compiled in the seventh century. He explained that according to the prophecy, the “sons of Ishmael”, which the rabbi identifies as Islam, will wage a war against “Edom”, which the rabbi identifies as Christianity. After this war, the sons of Ishmael will wage three wars against the Jews focused around Jerusalem.

    “Rabbi Ishmael (the High Priest) said, ‘Three wars of turmoil the Sons of Ishmael are destined to wage in Israel in the end-of-days’,” the prophecy reads, citing a verse in Isaiah.
    For they fled away from the swords, from the drawn sword, and from the bent bow, and from the grievousness of war. Isaiah 21:15
    The prophecy continues, “And from there, the Messiah from the House of David will grow, and he will witness their destruction, and then he will come to Israel.”
    Rabbi Berger explained how the prophecy, written hundreds of years before Muhammad founded Islam, related to current events.
    “The war between Islam and Christianity has been going on for some time now, in Europe and America,” Rabbi Berger said.  He identified the two intifadas Israel has suffered, the first from 1987-1993 and the second from 2000-2005, as the first two wars to which the prophecy refers.
    “Erdogan has just declared the third and final war for Jerusalem as foretold in the prophecy,” Rabbi Berger said.

    Read more at https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/87965/end-days-prophecy-describes-erdogan-leading-ishmael-final-war-jerusalem/#BSbSMjAxdkifOK2F.99

  13. The Lost History and Early Christianity

    http://reformedresource.net/index.php/worldviews/the-hand-of-god-in-history/194-the-lost-history-and-early-christianity.pdf

  14. this come from aolEmailAcct
    The FUTURE is approaching faster than one can handle….!

    In 1998, Kodak had 170,000 employees and sold 85% of all photo paper world
    Within just a few years, their business model disappeared and they went bankrupt
    What happened to Kodak will happen in a lot of industries in the next 10 years and, most people won’t see it coming.
    Did you think in 1998 that 3 years later you would never take pictures on film again?

    Yet digital cameras were invented in1975. The first ones only had 10,000pixels, but followed Moore’s law. So as with all exponential technologies, it was a disappointment for a time, before it became way superior and became mainstream in only a few short years. It will now happen again with Artificial Intelligence, health, autonomous and electric cars, education, 3Dprinting, agriculture and jobs. Welcome to the4th Industrial Revolution. Welcome to the Exponential Age .

    Software will disrupt most traditional industries in the next 5-10 years.

    Uber is just a software tool, they don’t own any cars, and are now the biggest taxi company in the world.

    Airbnb is now the biggest hotel company in the world, although they don’t own any properties.

    Artificial Intelligence: Computers become exponentially better in understanding the world . This year, a computer beat the best Go-player in the world, 10 years earlier than expected.

    In the US , young lawyers already don’t get jobs. Because of IBM’s Watson, you can get legal advice (so far for more or less basic stuff) within seconds, with 90% accuracy compared with 70% accuracy when done by humans.

    So if you study law, stop immediately. There will be 90% less lawyers in the future, only specialists will remain.

    Watson already helps nurses diagnosing cancer, its 4 times more accurate than human nurses.

    Facebook now has a pattern recognition software that can recognize faces better than humans. In 2030, computers will become more intelligent than humans. (NEVER!/Albert)

    Autonomous cars : In 2018 the first self driving cars will appear for the public. Around 2020, the complete industry will start to be disrupted. You don’t want to own a car anymore. You will call a car with your phone, it will show up at your location and drive you to your destination. You will not need to park it, you only pay for the driven distance and can be productive while driving.

    Our kids will never get a driver’s licence and will never own a car.

    It will change the cities, because we will need 90-95% less cars for that. We can transform former parking spaces into parks.

    1.2 million people die each year in car accidents worldwide. We now have one accident every 60,000 miles (100,000km), with autonomous driving that will drop to 1 accident in 6million miles (10million km). That will save a millionlives each year.

    Most car companies will probably become bankrupt. Traditional car companies try the evolutionary approach and just build a better car, while tech companies (Tesla, Apple, Google) will do the revolutionary approach and build a computer on wheels.

    Insurance companies will have massive trouble because without accidents, the insurance will become 100x cheaper. Their car insurance business model will disappear.

    Real estate will change. Because if you can work while you commute, people will move further away to live in a more beautiful neighbourhood.

    Electric cars will become mainstream about 2020. Cities will be less noisy because all new cars will run on electricity.

    Electricity will become incredibly cheap and clean: Solar production has been on an exponential curve for 30 years, but you can now see the burgeoning impact.

    Last year, more solar energy was installed worldwide than fossil. Energy companies are desperately trying to limit access to the grid to prevent competition from home solar installations, but that can’t last. Technology will take care of that strategy.

    With cheap electricity comes cheap and abundant water. Desalination of salt water now only needs 2kWh per cubic meter (@ 0.25 cents). We don’t have scarce water in most places, we only have scarce drinking water. Imagine what will be possible if anyone can have as much clean water as he wants, for nearly no cost.

    Health: The Tricorder X price will be announced this year. There are companies who will build a medical device (called the “Tricorder” from Star Trek) that works with your phone, which takes your retina scan, your blood sample and you breath into it.

    It then analyses 54 bio-markers that will identify nearly any disease.. It will be cheap, so in a few years everyone on this planet will have access to world class medical analysis, nearly for freeGoodbye, medical establishment.

    3D printing: The price of the cheapest 3D printer came down from $18,000 to $400 within 10 years. In the same time, it became 100 times faster. All major shoe companies have already started 3D printing shoes.

    Some spare airplane parts are already3D printed in remote airports. The space station now has a printer that eliminates the need for the large amount of spare parts they used to have in the past.

    At the end of this year, new smart phones will have 3D scanning possibilities. You can then 3D scan your feet and print your perfect shoe at home.

    In China, they already 3D printed and built a complete 6-storey office building. By 2027, 10% of everything that’s being produced will be 3D printed.

    Business opportunities: If you think of a niche you want to go in, first ask yourself: “In the future, do I think we will have that?” and if the answer is yes, how can you make that happen sooner?

    If it doesn’t work with your phone, forget the idea. And any idea designed for success in the 20th century is doomed to failure in the 21st century.

    Work : 70-80% of jobs will disappear in the next 20 years. There will be a lot of new jobs, but it is not clear if there will be enough new jobs in such a short time. This will require a rethink on wealth distribution.

    Agriculture : There will be a $100agricultural robot in the future. Farmers in 3rd world countries can then become managers of their field instead of working all day on their fields.

    Aeroponics will need much less water. The first Petri dish produced veal, is now available and will be cheaper than cow produced veal in 2018. Right now, 30% of all agricultural surfaces is used for cows. Imagine if we don’t need that space anymore.

    There are several start-ups who will bring insect protein to the market shortly. It contains more protein than meat. It will be labelled as “alternative protein source” (because most people still reject the idea of eating insects).

    There is an app called “moodies” which can already tell in which mood you’re in. By 2020 there will be apps that can tell by your facial expressions, if you are lying. Imagine a political debate where it’s being displayed when they’re telling the truth and when they’re no @aol.com

    but tday we got wanna cry eh?

    • It will now happen again with Artificial Intelligence, health, autonomous and electric cars, education, 3Dprinting, agriculture and jobs. Welcome to the4th Industrial Revolution. Welcome to the Exponential Age .

  15. Book:

    “CONSPIRACY IN PHILADELPHIA Origins of the United States Constitution” by Gary North

    I started reading this book this morning as it was recommended to me, since I have some time after getting bogged down in some things for weeks on end. Here is a quote from the Foreword and the Table of Contents:

    “Problem: political conservatives are deceived theologically because they do not recognize the implications of the intellectual shift from the deistic unitarian god of Sir Isaac Newton to the purposeless universe of Charles Darwin. They do not comprehend that the Darwinian god of man-controlled organic evolution (Lester Frank Ward) has replaced Newton’s god of the balanced machine. Process philosophy has replaced natural law theory. The conservatives’ allies, the Christian conservatives, also do not see this. This book is my attempt to teach a Christian remnant the true and long-ignored story of how this nation was hijacked politically in 1788 by the spiritual heirs of the self-conscious spiritual disciples of Isaac Newton. Then, in 1789, a social revolution organized by the victors’ spiritual cousins began in France.”

    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    Foreword……………………………………vii Preface……………………………………..xv Introduction……………………………………1
    Chapter 1: The Theological Origins of the U.S. Constitution…15
    Chapter 2: Renewed Covenant or Broken Covenant?………95
    Chapter 3: The Strategy of Deception………………..149
    Chapter 4: From Coup to Revolution…………………191
    Chapter 5: “We the People”: From Vassal to Suzerain to Serf.255
    Chapter 6: A New National Covenant………………..301 Conclusion…………………………………..313
    Appendix A: Rushdoony on the Constitution…………..345
    Appendix B: Shays’ Rebellion: Legend and Reality………387
    Appendix C: Philadelphia’s Other Constitutional Convention.405
    Appendix D: Freemasons in the American Revolution…….417 Index………………………………………422

    I do not recognize myself as a Theonomist. I say that because I believe the author does. Also, I noticed “Appendix A” mentions who I think is a Theonomist (Rushdoony). Yet, what I have heard though, is the author of the book, Gary North, and others like him are Christians who have not been afraid to write of the deception that exists. Appendix B-D do look appealing. So, I guess I will see what gems exist in the book.

    Free pdf of the book: file:///C:/Users/Owner/Downloads/philadelphia.pdf

    • thx Wildy for the book 🙂
      btw we talk bfore about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Masonic_Party

      • Very interesting. I might be working on a little research project, and this is actually the start of the direction I was going. From the wiki article you linked:

        “A national Anti-Masonic organization was planned as early as 1827, when the New York leaders attempted unsuccessfully to persuade Henry Clay to renounce his Masonic membership and head the movement.
        By 1830 the Anti-Masonic movement’s effort to broaden its appeal enabled it to spread to neighboring states, becoming especially strong in Pennsylvania and Vermont. In 1831, William A. Palmer was elected Governor of Vermont on an Anti-Masonic ticket, an office he held until 1835. Palmer’s brother-in-law, Augustine Clarke was an Anti-Masonic presidential elector in 1832, served as Vermont State Treasurer from 1833 to 1837, and was appointed to the Anti-Masonic National Committee in 1837. Other Vermont Anti-Masonic electors in 1832 included former Governor Ezra Butler and former United States Representative William Strong.
        The highest elected office held by a member of the Anti-Masonic Party was Governor. Besides Palmer in Vermont, Joseph Ritner was the Governor of Pennsylvania from 1835 to 1839.”

        What is also interesting, is the movement may have started in New York, even around Albany. Then it spread to surrounding states. It became a popular understanding at the time, that some of the Anti-Masons may have died at the hands of Masons, for instance, the Morgan affair.

    • you will also discover that Rushdoony and North are Dominionists

      • Yeap, I said they were theonomists. So beware, just like anything. There might be something to mine from the book. The historical parts, that I read so far (I have not yet reached chapter one, just the forward and introduction), line up with much of what I had learned so far from various other sources.

        Now I do believe Christ is King of kings, so, I do honor Him in that way. So I also have no problem with God’s law revealed in Scripture being the law, for it is the only law, in my faith.

        Matthew 22:37-40, “And he said to him, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.'”

        I understood this book might warn the conscience of some, and as with anything, there should be a sensitivity to one’s conscience. This is the present evil world, that had fallen and is full of sin.

        Just beware, as I said.

        • I just want to make it very clear to Isabel you are recommending a book promoting Dominionist agenda and causes me to question your agenda ??

          I am aware

          • No problem.

            I read a book about people who murdered a perfect man, and they did the most wicked crime that ever happened. Their devious plotting and shameful mob acts. Now that was terrible. To deny the Master is the worse of the worse (2 Peter 2:1). The bloody act turned out to be the most wonderful. It was truly murder, and yet, I trust in God and so my heart knows were my security is. God turned the worse act in history into the best, beyond the best. The book perfectly communicates, a most beautiful narrative, and is full of hope. I have been told in the book not to worry, so I trust in His Word for the strength to do what He said. It is a glorious message. Trust in Him. LORD bless

            • I am a witness to the death and resurrection of the authentic Messiah Yahshua Ha Masiach .. I am committed to exposing the fabrication of the false identity regardless of who may be offended ..

              Sir Francis Bacon is not alone in the attempt to pervert the Bible as the Greek New Testament is not original but translated from the Aramaic .. At the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?” which is translated, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” Mark 15:34 .. it is a fact witnessed by scripture that the Greek was translated from the original Aramaic .. why is this a problem? .. because Aramaic does not translate well into Greek, they are different cultures and many idioms do not make sense in Greek and translating also provides opportunity for deception .. so why Greek ??

              Apparently there was a division between early believers .. Hellenistic Jews vs Native Hebrews

              Acts 6:1
              Now at this time while the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint arose on the part of the Hellenistic Jews against the native Hebrews, because their widows were being overlooked in the daily serving of food.
              Acts 9:29
              And he was talking and arguing with the Hellenistic Jews; but they were attempting to put him to death.

              Native Hebrews did not identify themselves as ‘Christians’ but as Nazarenes .. there are more references to Nazarenes in the NT than ‘Christians’

              The early church historian Eusebius whose responsibility included authenticating the scriptures included in the NT was commissioned by the first Pope .. Constantine .. to provide 50 copies for his new religion .. ‘Christianity’ is a counterfeit religion and any translation based on the Greek NT is counterfeit .. The name Jesus Christ is a counterfeit identity .. rev17

              Constantine, Eusebius, and the Formulation of the New Testament Canon

              “It was at that puerile assembly [Nicea], and with so many cults represented, that a total of 318 “bishops, priests, deacons, subdeacons, acolytes and exorcists” gathered to debate and decide upon a unified belief system that encompassed only one god (An Apology for Christianity , op. cit.). By this time, a huge assortment of “wild texts” (Catholic Encyclopedia, New Edition, “Gospel and Gospels”) circulated amongst presbyters and they supported a great variety of Eastern and Western gods and goddesses: Jove, Jupiter, Salenus, Baal, Thor, Gade, Apollo, Juno, Aries, Taurus, Minerva, Rhets, Mithra, Theo, Fragapatti, Atys, Durga, Indra, Neptune, Vulcan, Kriste, Agni, Croesus, Pelides, Huit, Hermes, Thulis, Thammus, Eguptus, Iao, Aph, Saturn, Gitchens, Minos, Maximo, Hecla and Phernes ( G o d ‘s Book of Eskra, anon., ch. xlviii, paragraph 36)…Constantine’s intention at Nicaea was to create an entirely new god for his empire who would unite all religious factions under one deity. Presbyters were asked to debate and decide who their new god would be. Delegates argued among themselves, expressing personal motives for inclusion of particular writings that promoted the finer traits of their own special deity. Throughout the meeting, howling factions were immersed in heated debates, and the names of 53 gods were tabled for discussion. “As yet, no God had been selected by the council, and so they balloted in order to determine that matter… For one year and five months the balloting lasted…” (God’s Book of Eskra, Prof. S. L. MacGuire’s translation, Salisbury, 1922, chapter xlviii, paragraphs 36, 41). At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God.”

              http://www.spiritofthescripture.com/id3013-constantine-eusebius-and-the-formulation-of-the-new-testament-canon.html

          • The Greek is fine.

            Christians understand the message of Jesus Christ to our salvation. The gospel message people hear in different languages is sufficient to the salvation of God’s people. People may rest assured they are hearing the true infallible Word of God and their salvation is assured by the death of Christ on the cross. He has risen! Those who repent and believe in Christ are justified. We are pardoned legally by God from their sins, because Christ took the punishment in our place. We are legally forgiven. God is working in our life by a saving grace through the preached Word and Him – the Holy Spirit – to be completed at the last day.

            All is not lost because it is in Greek. God is not weak, like men. Men’s ways of understanding the philosophy of Greek or the ways of Buddhism or whatever, do not deter God. He accommodates to sinners who He is and the works His creation, providence, and redemption are known and understood. God’s thoughts are not our thoughts (Isaiah 55:8). God works in ways not by fallible men, but by His own way and authority. Jesus is the way, truth, and life. He sits on the throne at the right hand of the Father while the Spirit proceeds to the church throughout the world, delivering them from this present evil world. He salvationally loves His people, who repent and believe in Him, for His message is true and He has not abandoned us.

            “1 John 4:18 – There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear: because fear has torment. He that fears is not made perfect in love.

            2 Samuel 7:28 And now, O Lord GOD, you are that God, and your words be true, and you have promised this goodness unto your servant.”

            LORD bless

            • I agree God will speak to anyone who is sincerely seeking the truth .. although God may speak through a donkey .. if I listen only to the donkey .. I am a real ass

    • Rousas John Rushdoony – Father of Dominionism

      http://unsettledchristianity.com/rousas-john-rushdoony-father-of-dominionism/

    • Dominionism Takes Center Stage in America

      Did you stop to wonder how the political arena in the US got so top heavy with fundamentalist Christians? Indeed, as the social fabric began to fray under the multiplicity of stressors associated with modernization, a parallel movement of “back to fundamentals” began to emerge in all three Abrahamic religions. It is not only Islam that has birthed its own variety of fundamentalism. Orthodox synagogues are seeing a swelling of congregations, and a new strain of Christianity, which is both fiercely political as well as militant in its promotion of theocracy has emerged as a potent force on the American scene.
      Christian Reconstructionism (CR) has been called “the American Taliban.”
      Its ideology calls for the institution of a government under Biblical law. This mandate is called “Dominionism.” Christian Reconstructionists believe that the authority to exert political control in the material world is provided in Genesis, where it is written that: “Let them [man] have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, over the cattle and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” According to CR, this dominion is also to be executed over nations, specifically the American nation, which is seen as the instrument for God’s plan to rule the world.

      Heady stuff, and somewhat redolent of the belief system inherent in Islamic fundamentalism and the concomitant Sharia law. Under the mantle of a religious call to political action, CR has taken on a number of quasi- moral political issues. Not only anti-abortion, CR is also anti-welfare, anti-social programs and anti-public education.
                                                            Heaven on Earth?
      The homeschooling movement was in significant part launched by Rousas Rushdoony, who was the founder of CR. Rushdoony wrote prolifically on the necessity for Christians to become politically active in order to secure the planet for the Almighty.
      Wrote Rushdoony, “All law is religious in nature, and every non-Biblical law-order represents an anti-Christian religion.”  He continues, “Every law-order is a state of war against the enemies of that order, and all law is a form of warfare.” Rushdoony, who died in 2001, was succeeded by his son in law, Gary North, as the fountainhead of literature on CR.
      North, who has a PhD in History from the University of California, has laid down both economic and social principles for theonomy, or life under Biblical law. Faithful to Deuteronomy, North calls for the reinstitution of death by stoning. He specifically refers to those violating so- called moral law, such as unchaste women, homosexuals, and disobedient children as prospects for stoning.  (It has been noted, however, that lesbians would be spared as no specific reference to them can be found in the Books of Moses.) It is likely that non-Christians would also face execution.

      http://journal-neo.org/2015/09/02/dominionism-takes-center-stage-in-america/

    • From the book I linked above:

      “Newton was a dedicated practitioner of the occult art of alchemy. This has been known by Newton specialists ever since 1947. John Maynard Keynes, the Cambridge University economist, bought half of Newton’s papers at auction in 1936 and discovered this fact. He wrote an article on this in 1941. It appeared posthumously in 1947. Keynes identified Newton as ‘the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians. . . .’ Why did he call him this? ‘Because he looked on the whole universe and all that is in it as a riddle, as a secret which could be read by applying pure thought to certain evidence, certain mystic clues which God had hid from the world to allow a sort of philosopher’s treasure hunt to the esoteric brotherhood.’

      “Day and night, Newton would pursue his alchemical experiments, sometimes without eating. His experiments in alchemy were as rigorous and as detailed as his other scientific experiments. Writes Frances Yates, the remarkable historian of early modern occultism: “. . . Newton attached equal, or greater importance to his alchemical studies than to his work in mathematics.” He actually believed that in discovering the law of gravity, he was rediscovering an ancient secret truth which had been known by Pythagoras. The academic community did not learn of Newton’s alchemy until Keynes’ revelation.

      “[T]he deeply mystical and magical goal of alchemy: the self-transcendence of the alchemist. The alchemist, by a manipulation of the elements, seeks to achieve a leap of being, what today would be called an evolutionary leap. The familiar legend of the philosopher’s stone – the alchemical means of transforming base metals into gold – neglects the real goal which this transformation merely symbolizes: the transformation of the alchemist, and by implication and representation, of humanity. ‘Gold, we repeat, is the symbol of immortality.’ To dabble in alchemy, even for intellectually technical reasons, is to come very close to the messianic impulse of the deification of man. It is like dabbling in magic; it has consequences. One of the consequences was the French Revolution.

      “Margaret Jacob’s “Radical Enlightenment” is clear about the spread of pantheistic versions of Newtonianism into France through the Netherlands and Freemasonry. With it came a proclivity for the old neoplatonic Renaissance view of man, a view analogous to alchemy’s view of man. They both begin with the presupposition of magic and hermeticism: ‘As above, so below.’ There is an ontological relationship between man and the cosmos, a chain of being. Molnar put it this way: ‘. . . it means that there is an absolute although hidden concordance between the lower and the higher worlds, the key of which lends to the magus incalculable powers.’

      “Thus, by manipulating the cosmos, the initiate can change the nature of man (e.g., environmental determinism). On the other hand, by manipulating something near at hand, he can affect something far away (e.g., voodoo). One manipulates the external elements in order to change the nature of man. One also changes the nature of individual men in order to transform the environment.

      “E. M. Butler describes the goal of magic; it is also the goal of social engineering: ‘The fundamental aim of all magic is to impose the human will on nature, on man or on the supersensual world in order to master them.’ Alchemy involves initiation – access to secrets not known to common men. The alchemist uses his chemicals in a kind of self-initiation process. The virtue of the alchemist is crucial to the outcome of the experiment. Alchemical literature is filled with the theme of death and rebirth. Man is viewed as co-creator with God. This is a radically different conception from modern chemistry.

      “The alchemist’s procedures are seemingly similar to, yet radically different from, the chemist’s procedures. He mixes his chemicals in exactly the same way, again and again, waiting for a transformation. The chemist, in contrast, alters his procedure slightly if the experimental results repeatedly do not conform to his hypothesis. The main difference procedurally between alchemy and chemistry is in the techniques of cause and effect. The chemist publicly verifies the validity of his experiment by specifying the conditions under which he conducted the experiment, so that others can duplicate the experiment’s results. The alchemist, on the contrary, seeks to keep his procedures secret, as Newton did, and he expects most of these repetitions to produce no change. Then, after many attempts, after an unspecified series of repetitions of the mixing of the elements, there will be a discontinuous leap of being. The alchemist transcends himself, symbolized and verified by the transformation of the elements. This view of man and change has inevitable social implications. The alchemist sees himself as the first man of a new race, the representative in the present of a new people. It is an elitist view of social transformation.”

      – Nuts!

      • order out of chaos… color revolution… protest this, protest that… not that conditions are good before a revolution for the chaos is engineered

        “The purpose of the alchemist was to create the conditions of chaos in order to further the leap ahead in evolution. It is not at all surprising, therefore, that in the Enlightenment alchemists were closely allied to and central to the forces of revolution. Revolution is simply the theory of social alchemy.”

  16. Sir Francis Bacon is not alone in the attempt to pervert the Bible as the Greek New Testament is not original but translated from the Aramaic .. At the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?” which is translated, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?” Mark 15:34 .. it is a fact witnessed by scripture that the Greek was translated from the original Aramaic .. why is this a problem? .. because Aramaic does not translate well into Greek, they are different cultures and many idioms do not make sense in Greek and translating also provides opportunity for deception .. so why Greek ??
    Apparently there was a division between early believers .. Hellenistic Jews vs Native Hebrews

    Acts 6:1
    Now at this time while the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint arose on the part of the Hellenistic Jews against the native Hebrews, because their widows were being overlooked in the daily serving of food.
    Acts 9:29
    And he was talking and arguing with the Hellenistic Jews; but they were attempting to put him to death.

    Native Hebrews did not identify themselves as ‘Christians’ but as Nazarenes

    The early church historian Eusebius whose responsibility included authenticating the scriptures included in the NT was commissioned by the first Pope .. Constantine .. to provide 50 copies for his new religion .. ‘Christianity’ is a counterfeit religion and any translation based on the Greek NT is counterfeit .. The name Jesus Christ is a counterfeit identity .. rev17

    Constantine, Eusebius, and the Formulation of the New Testament Canon

    “It was at that puerile assembly [Nicea], and with so many cults represented, that a total of 318 “bishops, priests, deacons, subdeacons, acolytes and exorcists” gathered to debate and decide upon a unified belief system that encompassed only one god (An Apology for Christianity , op. cit.). By this time, a huge assortment of “wild texts” (Catholic Encyclopedia, New Edition, “Gospel and Gospels”) circulated amongst presbyters and they supported a great variety of Eastern and Western gods and goddesses: Jove, Jupiter, Salenus, Baal, Thor, Gade, Apollo, Juno, Aries, Taurus, Minerva, Rhets, Mithra, Theo, Fragapatti, Atys, Durga, Indra, Neptune, Vulcan, Kriste, Agni, Croesus, Pelides, Huit, Hermes, Thulis, Thammus, Eguptus, Iao, Aph, Saturn, Gitchens, Minos, Maximo, Hecla and Phernes ( G o d ‘s Book of Eskra, anon., ch. xlviii, paragraph 36)…Constantine’s intention at Nicaea was to create an entirely new god for his empire who would unite all religious factions under one deity. Presbyters were asked to debate and decide who their new god would be. Delegates argued among themselves, expressing personal motives for inclusion of particular writings that promoted the finer traits of their own special deity. Throughout the meeting, howling factions were immersed in heated debates, and the names of 53 gods were tabled for discussion. “As yet, no God had been selected by the council, and so they balloted in order to determine that matter… For one year and five months the balloting lasted…” (God’s Book of Eskra, Prof. S. L. MacGuire’s translation, Salisbury, 1922, chapter xlviii, paragraphs 36, 41). At the end of that time, Constantine returned to the gathering to discover that the presbyters had not agreed on a new deity but had balloted down to a shortlist of five prospects: Caesar, Krishna, Mithra, Horus and Zeus (Historia Ecclesiastica, Eusebius, c. 325). Constantine was the ruling spirit at Nicaea and he ultimately decided upon a new god for them. To involve British factions, he ruled that the name of the great Druid god, Hesus, be joined with the Eastern Saviour-god, Krishna (Krishna is Sanskrit for Christ), and thus Hesus Krishna would be the official name of the new Roman god. A vote was taken and it was with a majority show of hands (161 votes to 157) that both divinities became one God.”

    http://www.spiritofthescripture.com/id3013-constantine-eusebius-and-the-formulation-of-the-new-testament-canon.html

  17. The Deception of Constantine:The beginnings Romanism. I recommend this vid for you to watch to understand how Constantine was used during the early 4th Century to create a New One World Religion based on Nimrod’s Mystery Occult Babylonian Religion but Roman version populary know as MITHRAISM and mixing Judeo-Christian faith, which would give us an idea where Romanism really started. This is an excellent documentary roughly 45 minutes long documentary about Constantine based on archaelogical evidences and ancient writings portraying on how Constantine pretended to be a follower of Jesus of Nazareth. This documentary will take us to the true identity of Constantine, including what really is the spirit behind his fabrication of a New Roman Religion. Historical writings tells us that Constantine and Licinius issued the EDICT of MILAN that legalized Christianity and became the Offical Religion of the Roman Empire, hence Constantine became the First Emperor (First POPE?) of the Roman Catholic Empire and was also given honorary title and office of a bishop.

  18. Matthew dependent on Gospel of Nazarenes

    James R. Edwards (2009) argues that the canonical Matthew is based on a Hebrew original, and that the citations of the Gospel of the Nazarenes are part of that original.[18]
    Edwards’ view is predated by that of Edward Nicholson (1879), Bodley’s Librarian. His conclusions were as follows:
    “We find that there existed among the Nazarenes and Ebionites a Gospel commonly called the Gospel according to the Hebrews, written in Aramaic, but with Hebrew characters. Its authorship was attributed by some to the Apostles in general, but by very many or most — including clearly the Nazarenes and Ebionites themselves — to Matthew.”[19]

    “The Fathers of the Church, while the Gospel according to the Hebrews was yet extant in its entirety, referred to it always with respect, often with reverence: some of them unhesitatingly accepted it as being what tradition affirmed it to be — the work of Matthew — and even those who have not put on record their expression of this opinion have not questioned it. Is such an attitude consistent with the supposition that the Gospel according to the Hebrews was a work of heretical tendencies? This applies with tenfold force to Jerome. After copying it, would he, if he had seen heresy in it, have translated it for public dissemination into both Greek and Latin, and have continued to favor the tradition of its Matthaean authorship? And Jerome, be it observed, not only quotes all three of these passages without disapprobation; he actually quotes two of them (Fr. 6 and Fr. 8) with approval.”[20]

    Nicholson’s position that The Gospel of the Hebrews was the true Gospel of Matthew is still the subject of heated debate. However most scholars[21] now agree that the Gospel of Matthew found in the Bible was not written by Matthew, but composed posthumous to him.[11]

    The Talmudic evidence for early Christian gospels[citation needed], combined with Papias’ reference to the Hebrew “logia” (Eusebius, Church History III . 39 . 16)[22] and Jerome’s discovery of the Gospel of the Hebrews in Aramaic (Jerome, Against Pelagius 3.2) have led scholars such as C. C. Torrey (1951) to consider an original Aramaic or Hebrew gospel, meaning the Gospel of the Hebrews which the Nazarenes used.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_the_Nazarenes

  19. What has the Church hidden from you? Do you know the Truth or just what you have been told? Do you want the rest of the story? Can you handle it? Was Yeshua (Jesus) a Christian? Was He a Pharisaical Jew who died for our sins? Or was He teaching something radical and different than mainstream Judaism of his day taught, something different than Mainstream Christianity today? Something that got Him killed and His message hidden after His ascension? Is the Truth still out there, buried in long-forgotten books and vague historical references by the very men that wiped out the original faith and message once delivered to the saints? I invite you to join me as I search out the original Faith of the Yeshua and the 12 Apostles.

    DIDACHE!
    THE TEACHING OF THE TWELVE For all the Tribes

    The Didache Ton Dodeka Apostolon or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles is a constitution written by the second bishop of Jerusalem, Shimon, the half-brother and cousin of Y’shua ha Meshiach. Ya’akov ruled the church until 62 C.E. The Didache therefore must have been written between 63 C.E. and the death of Shimon in the early second century. The book was considered scripture until the Nicene Council, yet remains part of the greater canon in the Ethiopic Church. The official position of the Romans on Didache is expressed in the Catholic Encyclopedia in which it includes the work among the Apostolic Fathers. Many of those fathers considered the Didache second only to the Hebrew Scriptures.

    http://jacksonsnyder.com/yah/2014/HNR/Didache-120511-English-Only-Annotated-Version.pdf

    The Nazarene Acts of the Apostles:

    http://jacksonsnyder.com/yah/2014/HNR/Documents/_Nazarene%20Acts%20of%20the%20Apostles%202013.pdf

  20. New Testament Nazareans

    The pre Christ sect of Mt. Carmel Nazareans brought forth John the Baptist and Yeshua (Essene Jesus). After this time they seem to have been known, among Greek speaking Christian writers, as Nasarenes.
    The Christian writer Epiphanius, probably for his own propoganda purposes, sought to differentiate between the Nasarenes, Nazarites and the Nazarenes. His agenda was to show that the Nazarenes spoken of in the New Testament were identical to his own Greco-Roman “Christian” cult and not at all identical to Nazarite Essenes from Mt. Carmel whom he was hostile toward.

    Common sense, however, dictates that the Nasarenes who followed Yeshua the Nasarene (Jesus of Nazareth) were one and the same with the Nazarenes / Nazarenes spoken of in the New Testament (Acts 24:5). Different authors, often speaking with different accents and even languages, did not employ any form of universal spelling when speaking of Nazarenes. Hence one finds Nasarenes, Nazarenes, Nasarenes, Nasorenes, Nazaroi, Nazareaen, Nazarites, N’Tzrim, etc.

    These Nazarenes were also connected with the Jesseans in Egypt, and with the later Ebionites after they fled to Pella. Eventually these Nasarenes, along with other Hebrew speaking groups who accepted Yeshua as Messiah, came to be known indiscriminately as “Jewish Christians” by the Hellenistic Christians who were coming into power through their pact with Rome.

    http://www.essene.com/B%27nai-Amen/NewTestamentNazarenes.htm

  21. The Gospel of the Holy Twelve
    Translated from the original Aramaic

    This manuscript is claimed to be the reincarnation of the ancient Gospel of the Hebrews, the original Gospel of Matthew mentioned by Jerome and other early church fathers. This manuscript, which Rev. Gideon Ouseley discovered in 1881, is considered by us to be close to, if not identical with, the original Gospel used by ancient New Testament Essenes. 

    It is the position of the Essene Nazarean Church that this, and other important Essene writings, were systematically removed from common circulation when gentile Christians gained dominance over the Hebrew saints in the early fourth century AD. Learned men, so called Correctors were, following the church meeting at Nicea 325 AD, selected by the church authorities to scrutinize the sacred texts and rewrite them in order to correct their meaning in accordance with the views which the church had just sanctioned. 

    Our position on the The Gospel of the Holy Twelve is that Ouseley brought forth true material from, or related to, ancient documents of great import to modern Essenes. This scripture must stand on its own merits, however, and we claim no historicity to it, even if such exists, for we cannot back up such claims. We can, however, bear eloquent testimony to their truth and power to change lives, which is where we believe our emphasis should be.

    In 382 AD during the pope Damasos, the canonical texts were adopted and all old documents were destroyed. It is part of the mission of the Essene Nazarean Church to once again make these ancient and valuable texts available to all true seekers after Truth.

    The only changes made to this manuscript were the names Jesus, Jesu, Iesus, etc., changed to Yeshua, to reflect his original Aramaic name as opposed to the Greek renditions.

    WHAT SCHOLARS ARE SAYING
    Archdeacon Wilberforce of Westminster said “that after the Council of Nicea, AD 325, the MSS. of the New Testament were considerably tampered with”.
    Professor Nestle in his “introduction to the Textual Criticism of the Greek Testament” tells us that certain scholars, called correctors, were appointed by the ecclesiastical authorities, and actually commissioned to correct the text of Scripture in the interest of what was considered ORTHODOXY.

    Edmond Szekely says that the words of Jesus became half forgotten and were not collected until some generations after they were uttered, that they have been misunderstood, wrongly annotated and many times re-written and transformed. Indeed, the whole truth about the life and work of the Messiah, he says, has been suppressed and His story falsified and adulterated by ecclesiastical history.
    “Beyond question of doubt”, says Manley Palmer Hall, “records concerning Jesus do exist. It is equally certain that they are in the hands of people (the Vatican in Rome) who do not intend to make them available to Christian Theology”.
    In Lection 46 Verse 17, of the Gospel of the Nazarenes, that was translated in 1892, the term “Teachers Of Righteousness” is used, a term that was not known until the Discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls 1n 1947.

    http://www.essene.com/NazareneGospel/index.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: