A stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images

http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

Professor of University of California G. Schiller has noted: “To be successful, manipulation should remain invisible. The success of the manipulation is guaranteed when the manipulated believe that everything happens naturally and inevitably. In short, manipulation requires a false reality in which its presence will not be felt”. Very often this false reality is amplified by the media.

In the convergence of these Apollo 15 pictures, more than a million equations (the number of pixels in the images) were calculated obeying the laws of optics. In order to obtain a zero stereoscopic effect for a remote landscape, typical distortion grids were generated around the photographic session sites.

Numerous Apollo 15 photo examples indicate an identical distortion grid – a projection screen at the distance of 100-120 metres from the front of the studio stage. A serious falsification of the true lunarscape, in particular, an artificial trench 30-60 metres in width given for the lunar Rima Hadley which is actually 1,200 metres in width; the image of this remote lunarscape being projected onto the curved background screen; and ‘astronaut’ photographers taking pictures in front of it in a studio set.

The Apollo 15 photographic record contradicts the stereoscopic parallax verification method. The apparent change in the relative positions of objects by moving the camera when the camera angles are separated by several tens of cms show that:

  • the distance to distant objects such as mountains is not tens of kilometres but is no more
    than a few hundred metres;
  • the landscape is not continuous, but with clear lines of separation;
  • there is movement between nearby sections of the panorama relative to other sections. 

Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera.

These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective.

Dr Oleg Oleynik

Continue here: http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

———-

thanks to xxx for the link..

take the time to push through this article..its great..their conclusions are very controversial..

i smell stanley kubrick..

401

Advertisements

~ by seeker401 on July 27, 2017.

16 Responses to “A stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images”

  1. happy #kubrickday btw…

    as i’ve said before, my jury is still out regarding the moon landing. would love to see an attempt at debunking this study.

  2. […] Source: A stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images | Follow The Money […]

  3. Stanley was good for his time . What does NASA do with all the money it gets ? Has anyone inside NASA ever blown a whistle ?

    • maybe THEY-sent to THEY- AMAZON-monopoly THEY-BEZOS-DadorStep-dad work forNASA

      • I am sure it has gone to a good cause together with the trillions missing from the pentagon budget .

  4. My god. This is so huge I hardly know what to say. Do you think they dodgeied up all the moon landings? They couldn’t have… could they?

    • in the 60/70s when everything was far more controlled..the answer is..yes..they could have..

      why havent they been back if it was so easy and they went there 6 times in about 4 years with no hiccups in an era when a computer was the size of a car.. 🙂

  5. Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..

  6. nasa is fake and the earth is flat.wake up.

  7. well, i started digging a little… the first thing i noticed was “Professor of University of California G. Schiller has noted” which is an odd way of referencing someone… and sure enough, I can’t find any reference to this person outside of the article itself. if you google his quote only this article shows up – and this page here on seeker’s blog is the 4th hit…

    the author also appear to not be real…

    and then there’s this:

    https://www.metabunk.org/moon-stuff-stereoscopic-examination-of-photos.t2987/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: