What do famous people think about Zionist Jews?

———-

understand..my problem is with zionists..not with jews per se..

401

~ by seeker401 on December 28, 2017.

45 Responses to “What do famous people think about Zionist Jews?”

  1. Palestinians, Jebusites, and Evangelicals

    Many Palestinian Arabs, including such prominent figures as Yasir Arafat and Faisal Husseini, claim that Palestinians descended from the Canaanite tribe of the Jebusites.[1] Such declarations should not surprise. History is political. Many Middle Eastern cultures and states retroactively claim roots to the ancient tribes and empires in order to legitimize their modern nationalism. For instance, the Lebanese claim descent from the Phoenicians, Iraqis from the Babylonians, Kurds from the Medeans, and Turks from the Hittites.
    How significant, then, is the Palestinian-Jebusite link? Connections between modern Palestinians and ancient Jebusites would trump the Jewish claim by predating it and legitimize the Palestinian claim to Jerusalem and Israel. The political and diplomatic impact is clear, especially as Palestinian leaders insist that Israel forfeit sovereignty over Jerusalem. Less clear are the religious implications not only for Jews but also for the evangelical Christians who believe in the Old Testament promises of God to the nation of Israel.
    Who Are the Jebusites?
    Historical mention of Jerusalem predates the city’s appearance in Jewish history. Ancient texts such as the Egyptian execration texts (2000-1900 B.C.E.) refer to the city as Rushalimum. The word Jerusalem becomes more recognizable in a series of letters from around 1400 B.C.E. attributed to scribes acting on behalf of King Abdi-Hepa of Urusalim.[2] The Jebusites inhabited the ancient site of Jerusalem, perhaps as early as 3200 B.C.E.,[3] but there is reference to Yabusu, an old form of Jebus, on a contract tablet that dates from 2200 B.C.E.[4]
    The first mention of the Jebusites in the Bible occurs as Genesis lists the descendents of Noah. Here, they are counted as direct descendents of a man named Canaan.[5] Then in Exodus, as the Jews look to move to the land of Canaan that was promised to their patriarch Abraham, God promises to “drive out” the Jebusites and other tribes from the Promised Land.[6] In Deuteronomy, God orders the Jews to destroy completely “the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations more numerous and mightier than yourselves,” and forbids intermarriage with them.[7]
    Thus, while the promise to give the Promised Land to Abraham is unconditional, the pledge to remove its inhabitants such as the Jebusites is conditional upon Israel’s obedience. In the book of Judges, Israel is recorded as disobeying the order to completely annihilate the Jebusites who have committed “abominations” before God,[8] and the book relates how the Jebusites continued to mix with the sons of Benjamin in Jerusalem.[9] Looking at the Bible as a historical guide, this places Jews and Jebusites as coexisting in Israel about the eleventh century B.C.E. In 966 B.C.E., King David conquered Jebus, an event not only depicted in the Bible[10] but also confirmed independently by modern historians.[11] There is no mention of the Jebusites’ total annihilation.

    http://www.meforum.org/1713/palestinians-jebusites-and-evangelicals

  2. My problem is with Jew .. Zionism is empowered by the silence of the Jew .. I will not be silent ..

    The Land of Cannan is cursed .. the Cannanites were cursed .. Noah cursed Ham’s son Cannan .. why ?
    What crime was deserving of cursing an innocent child ? .. the Bible uses metaphor to hide a truth .. those who hold a literal interpretation remain blind to the truth .. if God is a God of justice, it makes no sense to curse a child because Ham ‘looked on his father’s nakedness’ ..

    Ham raped his own mother and Cannan was a child of incest .. the curse of Cannan is generational and the Israelites were commanded to put an end to the curse by annihilating the Cannanites ..

    Although the Israelites killed many they did not kill all the Cannanites and eventually gave their sons and daughters in marriage to the Cannanites and worshipped their gods, participated in child sacrifice, committing spiritual adultery .. in doing so .. the Israelites took upon themselves the curse of Cannan and God divorced Himself from the Israelites and sent the Assyrians and Babylonians and Greeks and Romans to deliver His justice .. this is what they believe and must be understood

    This is the reason the Jews remain silent concerning the atrocities committed against the Palestinians because they have the hope of having the curse removed if they annihilate the Palestinians

    • Incest in the Jewish Family

      I would stand next to Zada in services and would play with the fringes of his tallit. I loved the chanting. I loved the calmness of prayer. Although I did not understand the Hebrew, I felt God’s presence within my young soul.

      This was also a place to be safe. I had no knowledge of my own family history of incest. I didn’t know what my Zada, my wonderful grandfather, had done with his daughter. I didn’t know that incest could be passed on, generation to generation. I only knew of what was happening to me at home, which I was to never tell anyone.

      http://jewishincesthealing.blogspot.com/2007/08/journey-begins.html

      Palestine needs stronger laws against incest

      https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/03/palestine-incest-women-rights-rape-law.html

      This is zionism

      http://thisiszionism.blogspot.com/2009/03/incest-survivor-exposes-illuminati-jews.html

      Half of world’s Muslims are inbred due to generations of incest

      https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/07/17/half-of-worlds-muslims-are-inbred-due-to-generations-of-incest/

    • THE GENERATIONAL CURSE

      When Ham, the father of Canaan, saw that his father was naked, he went out and told his two brothers. 23 Then Shem and Japheth took a robe and held it behind them on their shoulders. They walked backward into the tent and covered their father, keeping their faces turned away so as not to see him naked. 24 When Noah sobered up and learned what his youngest son had done to him, 25 he said, “A curse on Canaan! .. Genesis 9

      7’You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father, that is, the nakedness of your mother. She is your mother; you are not to uncover her nakedness. 8You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife; it is your father’s nakedness. .. Leviticus 18

      • Yes, incest, even if in the case of Ham it was internal lust incest, it is the same.

        It is the same line of thought as when Jesus gave His sermon on the mount. The internal characterization (thought and feeling) is the same sin as acting upon it:

        Matthew 5:21-22a, ““You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ 22 But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.”

        Matthew 5:27-29, “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and cast it from you; for it is more profitable for you that one of your members perish, than for your whole body to be cast into hell.”

    • Ham being taken from his father was a curse, but they wouldn’t let a child be raised by a pervert.

  3. Seek who is the second person the girl with THEY Oscar?
    min-32 is the-MI5-Girl on-RT
    Prez-Trump need to put Palestine Embassy on East Jerusalem asp

  4. http://www.trumptwitterarchive.com/archive

  5. i know that if you criticize zionist jews, thats antisemitism. what about criticizing christian zionists? is that still antisemitism?

  6. great summary! thanks, seek.

    meet the inventors of the Monster “Z”, the lords of the universe, those who own every famous/important person in the modern history :

    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-colonization-association-ica

    (could merit a separate thread, seek)

    all of them came from the North of Germany to England (the Empire) in the 19th century, made fortune and intermarried with English aristocracy…belong to the clan, of course.

    from that list take notice of Sir Ernest Joseph Casse:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernest_Cassel
    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/cassel-sir-ernest-joseph

    his granddaughter Edwina, who inherited him, married Luis Monbatten (=Battemberg)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten,_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma,
    the ultimate mentor of Prince Phillip:

    “it was he who had arranged the visit of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth to Dartmouth Royal Naval College on 22 July 1939, taking care to include the young Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret in the invitation, but assigning his nephew, Cadet Prince Philip of Greece, to keep them amused while their parents toured the facility. This was the first recorded meeting of Charles’s future parents”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten,_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma#Mentorship_of_the_Prince_of_Wales

    take note as well of the absolutely traumatic upbringing of Prince Phillip (should be a case study for traumatised person, great food for a MKu controller):
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/prince-philips-unorthodox-upbringing-traumatic-childhood-shaped/

    …well, to sum things up: a zionist son-in-law arranges the marriage of a totally traumatised and ready-to-be-grateful to his padrinos consort of the queen of England, her biggest advisor and support…

    that’s how they are acting during the last 150 years. arranging the proper person to pop up aside a heir to lead him/her towards the fulfilment of the agenda.

    IMO.

    • Nice work. All roads lead to the synagogue.

      • thanks. that thread was an eye opener for me.
        “All roads lead to the synagogue.”
        Well, I think it’s the other way around: all roads lead to the oligarchs who make the ruling cartels (finance, banking, oil, pharmaceutical, etc. etc. industries). those “lords of the ring” need a devoted sub-contractors / sect members and so they organised, funded & supported the initial insertion of those grateful followers /controlled sect members all over the world. a century after the ICA was established, the great web of the sect under the command of the oligarchs has grown robust and perfectly functioning.

        curious that all those inicial 19th century jewish “barons” come from the same region: north of germany, cologne, hannover, frankfurt. those are the oligarchs. (as if a space shuttle landed there and spread its astronauts “jew” to colonise Earth…)

    • Thus, Harry gets Meghan, the jewess?

      “Who set up Britain’s Prince Harry and his new fiancee, Meghan Markle?

      The royal couple told the BBC that they were set up by a mutual friend, but declined to identify her: Markle said that the couple should “protect her privacy and not reveal too much of that.”

      Veteran royal-watchers believe that the “her” in question is Misha Nonoo, a fashion designer who is one of Markle’s closest friends. Nonoo also attended the wedding of Harry’s brother Prince to Kate Middleton, and her ex-husband Alexander Gilkes (who reportedly converted to Judaism to marry her) used to employ Harry’s cousin Princess Eugenie.”

      Read more: https://forward.com/fast-forward/388547/meghan-markle-prince-harry-jewish-matchmaker-misha-nonoo/

      • Here is a connected interest:
        I am reading “English Society in the Eighteenth Century” by Roy Porter published by Penguin Books. He covers in depth the Hanoverian politics (King William of Orange and the Georges post-Restoration) in England and how they were very different than the Stuart reins. The Hanoverian politics gave voters the only choice the established desired. The voters in the main never put anybody into office other than the choices the established higher social order gave as the only choices. Even somebody was put into office in the larger cities (more seats), they were pressured to go along with the established order. Once in power, through a number of negotiations, which included arranged marriages (families remained in Parliament for generations), putting money in their pockets (mainly by tax monies), and a whole other range of negotiation techniques, the high social order remained quite stable. The Stuart reins had a lot of instability, but the Hanoverians introduced layers upon layers of office bribes, office giving, along with the other negotiation techniques already mentioned, in order to give stability to the landowners (which the monarchy is the highest social order landowner). Parish offices and legal codes were written to solidify higher social ranks. Though bankers also tell monarchs what to do, e.g. Rothchilds, but the point is, the techniques have been around and were well worked in the Hanoverian dynasty on the continent and then moved to England when the Stuart rein was toppled ca. 1690. Side note: Bank of England was established in 1694, and quickly churned out debt for the coming centuries, and English politics in the 18th century quickly were forced into usually economic decisions as continues still as we know. Parliament increasing had to devote time to making sure financing could still occur. It consumed their time and energy more and more.

        England’s National Debt 1700: 14.2 million pounds
        England’s National Debt 1800: 456 million pounds

        • Sorry. Mistake.

          Reads: “Even somebody was put into office in the larger cities (more seats), they were pressured to go along with the established order.”

          Should Read: “Even if somebody was voted into office in the larger cities (more seats) without the establishments control, they were pressured to go along with the established order, or else.”

        • Very interesting, thanks adirondack.

      • Markle has English royalty roots as well.

      • Here is a quote from the book:

        “All of these constitutional finesses – or fictions – they vaunted as bree-born Englishmen’s guarantees against despotism…. ‘I cannot help feeling,’ argued that stalwart friend of the people, Charles James Fox, ‘that in this country at least, an aristocratic party is absolutely necessary to the preservation of liberty.’

        “Of course, this sedative rhetoric of constitutional liberty (with its polite fictions such as ‘virtual representation’, devised to prove that the disqualified were just as properly represented as the enfranchised) rationalized the hegemony of the great proprietors. Within this mythology, it was their guardianship of property rights that was in turn every Englishman’s security against despotism and demagogy alike chorused magnates who gloried in being the sultans of their own shires.”

        Roy Porter, “English Society in the Eighteenth Century” (London: Penguin Books, 1990), 115. [Title should be underlined; It is a book.]

      • the other day you guys-Int *XXX talked about La-Rouche we think don’t get more LaRouche that what is happening now with THEY LUCIFERIAN BRITTIS-EMPIRE in full force trying to survive haha from-OBOM with-HARRY
        guess…. probably the return to- Churchil bust was just smoke-mirrors ?
        Brittish-Empire is falling down

    • Sounds like many, if not most, of these are ‘arranged marriages’.

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1216186/The-shocking-love-triangle-Lord-Mountbatten-wife-founder-modern-India.html

      The spoiled favourite granddaughter of a Jewish financier close to the royals, Edwina Ashley was the richest and most glamorous deb of her time.

      In 1922, she married the handsome, though impoverished, 21-year- old Lord Louis Mountbatten. Known in the family as ‘Dickie’, he is nowadays best remembered as Prince Charles’s great-uncle and mentor, tragically killed by an IRA bomb in 1979.

      Ostensibly it was the perfect match, but the sexually inexperienced couple had little in common.

      (some say Lord Mountbatten preferred men)

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1216186/The-shocking-love-triangle-Lord-Mountbatten-wife-founder-modern-India.html#ixzz52bfh7RIX

    • Cassell became a Roman Catholic at the behest of his wife, but many still considered him a Jew. The establishment was surprised to find out that he had converted when he chose to be sworn into the Privy Council with the Douay–Rheims Bible.

      They’re all fake…no one is whom they claim to be. Jews who are not jews, Catholics who are not Catholics, etc…. hiding behind ‘re-legions’.

    • in the 50ies the ICA donated all its lands in Israel to the “Jewish National Fund”…take a look…

      https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Jewish%20National%20Fund&item_type=topic

      (British prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown had been Honorary Patrons of the JNF-UK, like all British prime ministers before them since its inception. )

  7. The Jews are terrible. So are Gentile’s. The one man around the 15 minute mark I think had too much hate. He said the devil is only a symbol of the Jews, even historically speaking, the idea of the devil comes from representing a Jew. Too far.

    The hard to swallow revelation is as follows: Anybody who does not follow Jesus, according to Jesus Himself, such a person’s father is the devil (not biologically, spiritually understood). That means, according to Jesus Himself as written in the gospel of John, not only Jewish unbelievers, but Gentile unbelievers, both, have a father who is the devil due to their unbelief.

    Yet there is hope. In Jesus, both Jew and Gentile may rest their faith. Jews are not exempt from the offer of salvation in Jesus.

    It probably is more proper to name corrupt Jews: Zionists or Judaists. Yet to not think Pontius Pilate and others of his kind are also corrupt, such people are being hoodwinked, too.

  8. ethnic identification is stupid. unfortunately for many it is enforced.

    some of my ancestors were awesome amazing people. others were assholes.

    what is it i’m supposed to take pride in?

  9. http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/12/jfk-assassination-co-conspirators-revealed-top-decision-makers-confirmed/

    JFK had bad thoughts and paid the price..lol

  10. “understand..my problem is with zionists..not with jews per se..

    401”

    C’mon wake up!
    We are not obliged to accept their fairy tales about “Jewish blood” from mommy because it was defined in their book.

    “Jews” are a multi-ethnic group who at least accept a minimum of what is written in the criminal Babylonian Talmud – that what makes somebody a Jew.

    If one defines oneself as a Jew, one does it because of ignorance or because one has decided to become an enemy to the “inferior Goyim”.

    Being a Jew is not something you are stuck with like the color of your skin, it is just a thought that one can reject. It is a thought-virus though, so perhaps it is not that easy to reject it.

    There is no humanism in Rabbinic Judaism. It is a racist and a supremacist religion and we should therefore not accept any of their definitions. Zero tolerance.

    According to the Halakhah(Jewish law) it is forbidden to save the Non-Jew from death if the Jew can get away with it. See
    http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messiahcom/2013/08/haredim-non-jews-and-human-life-678.html

    If the Jew does so, he commits a sin and must do repentance -teshuva.

    If the Jew breaks the sabbath to save a Non-Jew from death he is liable to the death penalty when “Mipnei Darkei Shalom” is over.
    See
    http://daatemet.org.il/en/torah-science-ethics/religion-ethics/gentiles-in-halacha/

    The Halakha also defines who is a Jew.
    Why would a decent person want to associate themselves with such a criminal system and define him/her self as “Jewish”?

    If somebody want to associate with this criminal religion then he/she has the duty and the obligation towards humanity to whistle blow its criminality.

    If the Jew doesn’t do this then the Jew is either ignorant about Judaism(the thought system which defines him as a Jew)
    or he/she is shilling for Judaism and cherishes its criminality against the Non-Jew.

    The usage of the word “antisemitism” like it is some special sort of racism is criminal, since Jews constitute a multi-ethnic group.
    If one is a racist because one doesn’t like Jews, then which race is it?
    Is it the blondes, the blacks, the south-east asians or the peruvian indians?
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/aug/07/israel1

    Therefore I have a big problem with so called “Jews” per se, because I dislike
    – ignorant people – “Secular Jews” who don’t know that they’ve chosen to associate themselves with criminality
    -people who consciously reject humanism -followers of Judaism
    and therefore I am a proud “antisemite”.
    I also dislike followers of satanism, but not that much as I dislike Jews, because satanists do not pretend they are a race and do not call you a racist.

    “Jews” are the enemies of humanity. Period. Full stop. We start from there.
    Why?
    Because Judaism forbids the saving of the Non-Jew, his children from death and the Jew should try to get away with it if retribution is avoidable.

    To then have the audacity to claim that we should accept this and that version which has the same name, but is allegedly humanist is out of the question. Denounce or die.

    If people want to be decent and keep their Jewish identity they have to whistle blow Judaism.

    Personally I don’t think that there can be anything in it to keep.
    Out of respect for the Non-Jews they should throw it as a whole into the dustbins, because it has caused humanity immense problems.
    “Jews” have always been the aggressors and have made humanity suffer
    from anitquity (Read Strabo)
    http://www.ark-of-salvation.org/jews_in_diaspora.htm
    until now

    Reports of Jewish ritual murder of Non-Jews have been reported relatively frequently since pre-christian times
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jewish+ritual+human+sacrifice

    Expulsions is self defence:
    https://direktdemokratihalmstad.wordpress.com/2017/07/04/jews-expelled-328-times-the-last-2700-years/

    Humanity has no place for people who reject universal humanism. “Jews” should therfore whistle blow Judaism and take a stand against its criminality or be put to death.
    Humanity has the right to defend herself!
    They did the Armenian and Bolshevik genocides, 911, USS Liberty, they pushed for the Iraq war, they prolonged WW1, they started WW2 and much much more.
    There is not one other group who has killed as many other people as the followers of Judaism.
    They are now pushing for nuclear war!!!
    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, points them out in the second article
    http://www.truthandaction.org/reganomics-creator-us-plans-nuclear-first-strike-russia-china/
    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/04/27/washington-plans-nuke-russia-china/
    http://www.sinopolitico.com/2017/07/27/how-information-is-controlled-by-washington-israel-and-trolls-leading-to-our-destruction/
    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/08/31/are-you-a-mind-controlled-cia-stooge-paul-craig-roberts/

    Judaism has declared war on humanity!
    https://direktdemokratihalmstad.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/judaism-has-declared-war-on-humanity-proof/

  11. Many Orthodox would respond: #ZionismIsNotJudaism, so maybe your question is flawed in implying there are Zionist Jews.

    • you dont have to be a jew to be a zionist..

      • True.

        Another thing to consider is you don’t have to be a Zionist to pretend to support Zionism. Israel was created to lure Jews out of the diaspora, but it became a lucrative disaster fundraiser for the CFR/RIIA to use as an excuse to loot the international community. Remember, the Rothschilds are blue-eyed Germans, Viking stock, that will be important to remember later.

        • the adaption of the biblical “jews” being the current and correct land owners of Palestine fools thousands..

          israel doesnt care who it is fighting as long as there is a fight..they can then justify their violence..

          ive looked briefly at the viking thing..its interesting..

          • Ownership is a tricky philosophical problem, since there’s nothing in the laws of physics to determine who owns what. Another problem is so much of the world’s wealth was got by war, looting, and fraud, such as fractional reserve lending, counterfeiting, as in the case of the Templars, which should be addressed, since it seems the banker-warriors are leading everyone into yet another crusade for Jerusalem.

            Another interesting fact is the Viking stock were very wealthy (banker-warriors) and owned much of Sicily when the Templar banker-warriors were excommunicated by Rome and their leadership was driven back to Northern Europe… then the plague broke out in Italy, in Sicily. It was known that the plague was been intentionally spread in the East as a bioweapon, so it’s not unlikely the Nordic tribes unleashed it on Italy as retribution.

            I’m coming to the conclusion that the Vikings, Templars, Masons, Rothschilds, and Nazis are all one and the same, one long tradition of racist pillaging.

            • thats not as crazy as it sounds..ive read that the vikings may have been templars who had nowhere to go but onto the water..pirate flags are also skull and bones..were they templars?

              • I once saw a small article noting similarities between Masonic rites and Viking rites, but it was a weak argument.

                I’ve also heard about the Jolly Roger and the Templars becoming pirates, but the Templars owned so much of Europe and had so much widespread influence before being excommunicated, it’s hard to believe they had nowhere to go (except for the famous ones), so I imagine they simply became pirates because that’s what they were at heart. At the time, pirates were crushing the shipping routes of the Hanseatic League of Free cities which ignored local royals and allied with Rome and took away control of Scandinavian shipping routes, so I think it very likely Templars supported that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: