The Bank for International Settlements is “A bastion of global technocracy”

There’s a changing of the guard at the Bank for International Settlements, the little-known but influential organization that sits at the heart of the world’s financial system.

Agustin Carstens, the former head of Mexico’s central bank, will succeed Jaime Caruana as general manager on Friday. He’s taking charge of an institution that stands out, in an age of increasing transparency and growing disillusionment with elites, as a bastion of global technocracy.

The BIS headquarters towers over Basel like a 70-meter stack of copper coins, serving as a clubhouse for the world’s central bankers and financial rule makers. The likes of Mario Draghi, Janet Yellen and Mark Carney routinely hold confidential gatherings there with colleagues from around the globe.

“Maybe if it didn’t exist you wouldn’t invent it now, but it plays an important role in the central banking world,” said Charlie Bean, the former deputy governor of the Bank of England who co-authored a report on the BIS’s research last year. “It’s the glue that helps keep the fraternity together.”

That hasn’t stopped the BIS, which is owned by central banks and was founded in 1930, from challenging the economic orthodoxy of its own members. By 2003, William White, then economic adviser, and colleague Claudio Borio were pushing for preemptive monetary policy tightening to avoid dangerous asset bubbles, a contrarian view that looked prescient during the financial crisis.

It’s kept beating that drum even as central bankers in the U.S., Europe and Japan slashed interest rates to record lows and launched unprecedented bond-buying programs to fend off deflation. Borio, now head of the monetary and economic department at the BIS, argued in a September speech that central bankers may be underestimating the “generally benign” effects of globalization and technology on inflation, and should rethink their response to deflationary trends.

He called out Larry Summers, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary and a proponent of the “secular stagnation” theory, who argues weak U.S. growth and inflation result from a persistent shortfall in demand.

Summers, in response to questions, described the BIS as “an important source of thinking on issues relating to financial stability and economic performance,” while adding that he frequently disagrees with their conclusions.

He’s not alone in questioning the BIS’s stance. A review of the bank’s publications co-authored by Bean and published in 2016 found the organization “doing a lot right” on the research front, but expressed reservations about the BIS “generating results to support the ‘house view.”’

Caruana, whose tenure began during the dark days of the financial crisis in April 2009, defended the BIS. “You may agree with what we say or not, but I think there is a value to introducing these elements in the debate,” he said last week, referring to the bank’s preference for taking a medium-term, global perspective and highlighting financial stability risks.

Research aside, the BIS has grown in prominence in the years of monetary policy experimentation and banking regulation that followed the crisis. While some central banks made efforts to open up as their increasing powers drew scrutiny from voters and governments, in Basel they’ve rowed back. Jens Weidmann, president of Germany’s Bundesbank and chairman of the BIS’s board of directors, said sometimes secrecy is necessary.

“Informed decisions on domestic monetary policy require a nuanced understanding of international developments,” Weidmann said. “The privacy of the meetings facilitates a frank and open exchange of views.’’

The organization hosts the Financial Stability Board and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which meet at the bank to hash out the rules that govern the international financial system. There’s also the Global Economy Meeting and its sister body, the Economic Consultative Committee, dubbed “the world’s most exclusive club” by Adam LeBor, the author of a book on the BIS.

These latter two groups convene once every two months, on a Sunday, for formal sessions followed by a dinner on a top floor of the BIS tower, with 360-degree views of Basel and the mountains. They seldom open themselves to scrutiny from the press and the public.

The clubby and shrouded nature of the organization and the committees it hosts contrasts with efforts at greater transparency elsewhere. The ECB bowed to public pressure in 2015 and began publishing the minutes of its meetings, while the Federal Reserve started holding quarterly press conferences in 2011.


do as we say not as we do..

“While some central banks made efforts to open up as their increasing powers drew scrutiny from voters and governments, in Basel they’ve rowed back. Jens Weidmann, president of Germany’s Bundesbank and chairman of the BIS’s board of directors, said sometimes secrecy is necessary.”


~ by seeker401 on January 8, 2018.

4 Responses to “The Bank for International Settlements is “A bastion of global technocracy””

  1. Many don’t know the BIS has another building in Basel:

    Very nice, with black and white mansonic stripes 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: