Australia adopts presumption of guilt denying any presumption of innocence rejecting all principles of a free society

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/australia-oceania/australia-adopts-presumption-of-guilt-denying-any-presumption-of-innocence-rejecting-all-principles-of-a-free-society/

Australia is really rejecting all the basic tenets of civilization and is moving ever closer and closer to simply an authoritarian government. Australia is rejecting the foundation of a FREE SOCIETY by rejecting the presumption of innocence and assuming you are just guilty while shifting the burden to you to prove you are innocent. Australia has rejected the fundamental principle of a FREE SOCIETYand is now crossing into the zone of an authoritarian regime that is unfit for consideration of capital investment. This is a BLUNT statement, but it is one that indeed is shocking to have to even write.

Australia is making it that anyone convicted of any crime whatsoever that they can call a “criminal”will have the burden to explain how they got all the money in their life. In reality, Australia has restored the very greed of the state that led to the abuse of the rule of law that even led to the both the English Civil War and the American Revolution. The English system was stark. If you were charged with a felony, of which there were over 200 such crimes that did not need to be violent, then you were sentenced to death and the king confiscated all your property. Your family was thrown out of the street. This is where torture entered the legal system. If you confessed, then you were granted a swift death and the King took all your property. Even entering a plea of not guilty would result in the confiscation of all your property. People would stand there and refuse to enter a plea. The king would then torture you. Many people endured the torture to save their families.

This is the policy now adopted by Australia. Under a national scheme, the government gets to confiscate ALL your assets if you are convicted of a crime. Of course, this now creates the incentive to deny people the right to any fair trial and the average conviction rate of 90% will now surely rise to match that of the United States which stands at around 99%. Unfortunately, a Senate committee unanimously recommended the “unexplained wealth” legislation be passed despite concerns being raised by the Law Council and Civil Liberties Australia.

It is shocking that Australia would even contemplate such legislation that would force people convicted of crimes to prove that their wealth was derived from legitimate sources. The way this will be enforced is clear. You can be convicted of drunk driving and then have to prove all your assets are derived from legitimate sources. There will be NO requirement to establish any nexus between the crime being charges and the possession of assets.

Banks will be forced to hand over any information they have on the unexplained wealth of a convicted person in Australia. The Police Federation has been lobbying for this type of legislation so they can fill their coffers and pay their pensions.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/criminals-required-to-explain-their-wealth-in-national-crackdown-20180806-p4zvt9.html

Criminals who can’t explain how they got their money will be punished under a national scheme that allows the government to sweep up their assets.

A Senate committee unanimously recommended the “unexplained wealth” legislation be passed on Monday despite concerns being raised by the Law Council and Civil Liberties Australia.

The legislation will force people convicted of crimes to prove that their wealth was derived from legitimate sources, rather than the onus being on prosecutors to establish that it came from the proceeds of crime.

The new scheme will co-ordinate state-based frameworks that Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton had argued were used by criminals to evade jurisdictions.

Banks will be forced to hand over any information they have on the unexplained wealth of a convicted client.

The Police Federation has been lobbying for the national scheme for more than a decade. “Crime bosses were exploiting differences in criminal laws in Australia,” it said in its submission.

————

thanks to rev17 for the link..

“Australia is making it that anyone convicted of any crime whatsoever that they can call a “criminal”will have the burden to explain how they got all the money in their life. In reality, Australia has restored the very greed of the state that led to the abuse of the rule of law that even led to the both the English Civil War and the American Revolution. The English system was stark. If you were charged with a felony, of which there were over 200 such crimes that did not need to be violent, then you were sentenced to death and the king confiscated all your property. Your family was thrown out of the street.”

get it?

“Banks will be forced to hand over any information they have on the unexplained wealth of a convicted client.”

401

~ by seeker401 on August 16, 2018.

5 Responses to “Australia adopts presumption of guilt denying any presumption of innocence rejecting all principles of a free society”

  1. Looks like their pension system is coming under ‘scrutiny’ too….. sounds to me like the international banksters are planning another heist of the people, and the leaders in Australia have joined the ranks of the international ‘traitors’.

    Australia’s lauded private-pension system is under scrutiny
    An inquiry has exposed a number of egregious rip-offs

    https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2018/08/18/australias-lauded-private-pension-system-is-under-scrutiny

  2. Some more, ‘interesting’ news from Australia

    Australia Targeted Thousands of Times in Cyber Attacks by Overseas Agencies

    https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/08/16/10/40/malcolm-turnbull-cyber-security-australia-targeted-in-thousands-of-attacks

    costing businesses “$ 7 ” Billion a year

    there’s that magick, lucky seven again!!

  3. The History of Judaism in Australia

    The War on White Australia: A Case Study in the Culture of Critique, Part 2 of 5

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/08/16/the-war-on-white-australia-a-case-study-in-the-culture-of-critique-part-2-of-5/

    • Unlike in Britain where Jews were gradually emancipated through Parliamentary Acts in 1854, 1858 and 1866, in the Australian colonies they enjoyed full civil and political rights from the beginning: they acquired British nationality, voted at elections, held commissions in the local militia, were elected to municipal offices and were appointed justices of the peace.[ii] Jews were well integrated into the political and administrative structure of the colonies. Sir John Monash (1865-1931) became a general in the Australian army and was, according to Goldberg, “the only Jew in the modern era outside Israel (with the exception of Trotsky) to lead an army.”[iii] Sir Isaac Isaacs (1855-1948) became Australia’s first native-born Governor-General. In Australia under the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901 these highly assimilated Anglo-Jews were regarded as “White,” whereas Jews of middle-eastern origin were regarded as Asian and therefore barred from entry.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: